Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023 Oct 2;25(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00962-9.
Coronary magnetic resonance angiography (coronary MRA) is increasingly being considered as a clinically viable method to investigate coronary artery disease (CAD). Accurate determination of the trigger delay to place the acquisition window within the quiescent part of the cardiac cycle is critical for coronary MRA in order to reduce cardiac motion. This is currently reliant on operator-led decision making, which can negatively affect consistency of scan acquisition. Recently developed deep learning (DL) derived software may overcome these issues by automation of cardiac rest period detection.
Thirty individuals (female, n = 10) were investigated using a 0.9 mm isotropic image-navigator (iNAV)-based motion-corrected coronary MRA sequence. Each individual was scanned three times utilising different strategies for determination of the optimal trigger delay: (1) the DL software, (2) an experienced operator decision, and (3) a previously utilised formula for determining the trigger delay. Methodologies were compared using custom-made analysis software to assess visible coronary vessel length and coronary vessel sharpness for the entire vessel length and the first 4 cm of each vessel.
There was no difference in image quality between any of the methodologies for determination of the optimal trigger delay, as assessed by visible coronary vessel length, coronary vessel sharpness for each entire vessel and vessel sharpness for the first 4 cm of the left mainstem, left anterior descending or right coronary arteries. However, vessel length of the left circumflex was slightly greater using the formula method. The time taken to calculate the trigger delay was significantly lower for the DL-method as compared to the operator-led approach (106 ± 38.0 s vs 168 ± 39.2 s, p < 0.01, 95% CI of difference 25.5-98.1 s).
Deep learning-derived automated software can effectively and efficiently determine the optimal trigger delay for acquisition of coronary MRA and thus may simplify workflow and improve reproducibility.
冠状动脉磁共振血管造影(coronary MRA)越来越被认为是一种可行的临床方法,用于研究冠状动脉疾病(CAD)。为了减少心脏运动,准确确定触发延迟以将采集窗口放置在心脏周期的静止部分内对于冠状动脉 MRA 至关重要。目前,这依赖于操作人员主导的决策,这可能会对扫描采集的一致性产生负面影响。最近开发的深度学习(DL)衍生软件可以通过自动化心脏休息期检测来克服这些问题。
使用基于 0.9 毫米各向同性图像导航仪(iNAV)的运动校正冠状动脉 MRA 序列对 30 名个体(女性,n=10)进行了研究。每个个体都使用三种不同的策略扫描了三次,以确定最佳触发延迟:(1)DL 软件,(2)经验丰富的操作人员决策,和(3)用于确定触发延迟的先前使用的公式。使用定制的分析软件比较了方法,以评估整个血管长度和整个血管的前 4 厘米的可见冠状动脉血管长度和冠状动脉血管锐利度。
在所评估的最佳触发延迟确定方法中,任何方法的图像质量都没有差异,可见冠状动脉血管长度、整个血管的冠状动脉血管锐利度和左主干、左前降支或右冠状动脉的前 4 厘米的血管锐利度。然而,使用公式方法时,左回旋支的血管长度略长。与操作人员主导的方法相比,DL 方法计算触发延迟的时间明显更短(106±38.0 秒与 168±39.2 秒,p<0.01,差异的 95%置信区间为 25.5-98.1 秒)。
深度学习衍生的自动软件可以有效地确定冠状动脉 MRA 采集的最佳触发延迟,从而可以简化工作流程并提高可重复性。