Suppr超能文献

预防幼儿过敏的辅食添加时机:系统评价综述

Timing of complementary feeding for early childhood allergy prevention: An overview of systematic reviews.

作者信息

Kuper Paula, Hasenpusch Claudia, Proebstl Simone, Matterne Uwe, Hornung Catherine J, Grätsch Esther, Li Mengtong, Sprenger Antonia A, Pieper Dawid, Koplin Jennifer J, Perkin Michael R, Genuneit Jon, Apfelbacher Christian

机构信息

Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.

Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Exp Allergy. 2023 Dec;53(12):1243-1255. doi: 10.1111/cea.14399. Epub 2023 Oct 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To summarise and critically appraise systematic review (SR) evidence on the effects of timing of complementary feeding (CF) on the occurrence of allergic sensitisation and disease.

DESIGN

Overview of SRs. AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS were used to assess methodological quality and risk of bias (RoB) of SRs. RoB 2 Tool was used to assess RoB of primary randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (or extracted). The certainty of evidence (CoE) was assessed using GRADE. Findings were synthesised narratively.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (via PubMed and Ovid), the Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection (2010 to 27 February 2023).

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

SRs investigating the effects of timing of CF in infants or young children (0-3 years) on risk of developing food allergy (FA), allergic sensitisation, asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic eczema and adverse events based on RCT evidence.

RESULTS

Eleven SRs were included. Only two SRs had low RoB; common issues were failure to report on funding of primary studies and failure to provide a list of excluded trials. Common limitations of included trials were lack of blinding of outcome assessment or detailed trial preregistration, and inadequate handling of high loss to follow up. Primary study overlap was very high for specific FA and slight to moderate for FA in general and other primary outcomes. Introducing specific foods (peanut, cooked egg) early probably reduces the risk of specific FA. Evidence for other allergic outcomes was mostly very uncertain and based on few primary studies. Trials varied regarding timing of CF, nature of complementary foods and population risk, which limited comparability between SRs.

CONCLUSIONS

For developing guidelines to support decision-making on the timing of CF as a preventive strategy, early introduction of specific foods (i.e. egg and peanut) seems promising and safe, whereas more extensive research is required regarding other allergic outcomes and potential adverse events.

摘要

目的

总结并批判性评价关于辅食添加(CF)时间对过敏致敏和疾病发生影响的系统评价(SR)证据。

设计

SR的概述。使用AMSTAR-2和ROBIS评估SR的方法学质量和偏倚风险(RoB)。使用RoB 2工具评估原始随机对照试验(RCT)(或提取的数据)的RoB。使用GRADE评估证据的确定性(CoE)。采用叙述性方式综合研究结果。

数据来源

MEDLINE(通过PubMed和Ovid)、Cochrane图书馆和科学网核心合集(2010年至2023年2月27日)。

纳入标准

基于RCT证据,研究婴幼儿(0至3岁)CF时间对食物过敏(FA)、过敏致敏、哮喘、过敏性鼻炎、特应性皮炎和不良事件发生风险影响的SR。

结果

纳入11项SR。只有两项SR的RoB较低;常见问题是未报告原始研究的资金来源以及未提供排除试验的清单。纳入试验的常见局限性包括结局评估缺乏盲法或详细的试验预注册,以及对高失访率处理不当。特定FA的原始研究重叠率非常高,总体FA及其他主要结局的重叠率为轻度至中度。早期引入特定食物(花生、熟鸡蛋)可能会降低特定FA的风险。其他过敏结局的证据大多非常不确定,且基于少数原始研究。试验在CF时间、辅食性质和人群风险方面存在差异,这限制了SR之间的可比性。

结论

为制定支持CF时间作为预防策略决策的指南,早期引入特定食物(即鸡蛋和花生)似乎有前景且安全,而对于其他过敏结局和潜在不良事件则需要更广泛的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验