Izadi Neema, Saff Rebecca R
Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Children's Hospital Los Angeles/Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2022 Sep 6;1(4):305-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2022.08.002. eCollection 2022 Nov.
Despite the immense burden of allergic disease, the allergy and immunology (AI) workforce in the United States continues to shrink. Fellowship applications for AI have declined sharply in contrast to those in more popular specialties.
Here we have sought to evaluate the current level of AI interest and exposure among early trainees in the United States, as well as their perspective on how to improve interest in the field.
An 18-item questionnaire was sent via e-mail list-serve to 2 groups: (1) mostly residents in the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI) with interest in AI and (2) medical students in the American Medical Student Association (AMSA) whose specialty interests were not known.
In the AAAAI group, 412 members were surveyed and 70 responses were received. In the AMSA group, 4778 members were surveyed and 47 responses were received. More individuals in the AAAAI group interacted with their AI division than in the AMSA group (73% vs 19% [ < .001]). On average, the AAAAI group would "probably" pursue AI whereas the AMSA group who would "definitely not" do so ( < .001). Almost all of the AMSA group (94%) had heard of AI before, but only 19% of them interacted with AI at their program. Regarding ways to increase interest in AI, the top responses for both groups were clinical exposure via electives and shadowing (a score of 4.69 on a 5-point scale) and didactic exposure via lectures and presentations (a score of 4.29).
Our study suggests that increasing AI opportunities for didactics and clinical exposure may lead medical students to develop more interest in pursuing the field. Some strategies are also discussed.
尽管过敏性疾病负担沉重,但美国过敏与免疫学(AI)领域的专业人员数量仍在持续减少。与更热门的专业相比,AI专业 fellowship 的申请人数急剧下降。
我们旨在评估美国早期受训人员对AI的兴趣和接触程度,以及他们对如何提高该领域兴趣的看法。
通过电子邮件列表向两组人群发送了一份包含18个条目的问卷:(1)主要是美国过敏、哮喘与免疫学会(AAAAI)中对AI感兴趣的住院医师;(2)美国医学生协会(AMSA)中专业兴趣未知的医学生。
在AAAAI组中,共调查了412名成员,收到70份回复。在AMSA组中,共调查了4778名成员,收到47份回复。AAAAI组中与AI科室互动的人数多于AMSA组(73% 对 19% [P <.001])。平均而言,AAAAI组“可能”会从事AI专业,而AMSA组“肯定不会”(P <.001)。几乎所有AMSA组的成员(94%)之前都听说过AI,但其中只有19%的人在其项目中与AI有过互动。关于提高对AI兴趣的方法,两组的首要回复都是通过选修课程和见习进行临床接触(在5分制中得分为4.69)以及通过讲座和报告进行理论接触(得分为4.29)。
我们的研究表明,增加AI领域的理论学习和临床接触机会可能会使医学生对该领域产生更大的兴趣。我们还讨论了一些策略。