Xiong Min, Feng Mei, Chen Yanli, Li Shanshan, Fang Zhengfeng, Wang Lina, Lin Derong, Zhang Qing, Liu Yuntao, Luo Yuheng, Chen Hong
College of Food Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, Sichuan 625014, China.
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Food Chem X. 2023 Aug 16;19:100827. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100827. eCollection 2023 Oct 30.
In this research, the different methods (acid extraction, alkaline extraction and enzymatic extraction) were used to extract soluble dietary fiber (SDF) from pomegranate peel and compared with water extraction. Results revealed that all three extraction methods influenced the structure, physicochemical and functional properties of SDF. Especially, SDF extracted by enzymes (E-SDF) and SDF extracted by alkali (A-SDF) had higher yield (27.30% and 27.17%), molecular weight and thermal stability than SDF extracted by water (W-SDF). Higher oil holding capacity (OHC) was found in SDF extracted by acid (C-SDF) (3.18 g/g), A-SDF (3.18 g/g) and E-SDF (5.36 g/g) compared with W-SDF. In addition, A-SDF showed the smallest particle size, lowest ζ-potential and highest viscosity among the tested samples. E-SDF presented a more porous structure, better glucose adsorption capacity (GAC) and antioxidant activity than C-SDF and A-SDF. To sum up, A-SDF and E-SDF may have great potential to be functional food ingredients in the food industry.
在本研究中,采用不同方法(酸提取、碱提取和酶提取)从石榴皮中提取可溶性膳食纤维(SDF),并与水提取法进行比较。结果表明,所有三种提取方法均影响SDF的结构、理化性质和功能特性。特别是,酶提取的SDF(E-SDF)和碱提取的SDF(A-SDF)比水提取的SDF(W-SDF)具有更高的得率(分别为27.30%和27.17%)、分子量和热稳定性。与W-SDF相比,酸提取的SDF(C-SDF)(3.18 g/g)、A-SDF(3.18 g/g)和E-SDF(5.36 g/g)具有更高的持油能力(OHC)。此外,在测试样品中,A-SDF的粒径最小,ζ电位最低,粘度最高。与C-SDF和A-SDF相比,E-SDF呈现出更多孔的结构、更好的葡萄糖吸附能力(GAC)和抗氧化活性。综上所述,A-SDF和E-SDF在食品工业中作为功能性食品成分可能具有巨大潜力。