Mazzeo Rinaldi Francesco, Leone Liliana
Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
CEVAS, Rome, Italy.
Front Sociol. 2023 Sep 14;8:1202430. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1202430. eCollection 2023.
Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) schemes have been adopted mostly in low-income countries as a tool to break the vicious cycle of poverty transmission. Although their use is controversial, behavioral conditionalities have also been widely used in welfare-to-work strategies, minimum income scheme, and labor market "activation" policies in OECD countries. The paper presents the results of a Realist Review to synthesize the evidence of CCTs related to work conditionality, delivered in OECD countries. The evaluation literature of 23 selected CCT programs was analyzed by reconstructing Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations. The main findings show that CCTs can be an effective counterbalance to work disincentives introduced by welfare measures. The unintended negative impacts, the role of sanctioning, and the causal pathways that may affect the most disadvantaged people and their children are discussed.
有条件现金转移支付(CCTs)计划大多在低收入国家被采用,作为打破贫困传递恶性循环的一种工具。尽管其使用存在争议,但行为条件规定也在经合组织国家的福利转工作计划、最低收入计划和劳动力市场“激活”政策中被广泛使用。本文呈现了一项现实主义综述的结果,以综合经合组织国家实施的与工作条件规定相关的有条件现金转移支付的证据。通过重构背景 - 机制 - 结果配置,对23个选定的有条件现金转移支付项目的评估文献进行了分析。主要研究结果表明,有条件现金转移支付可以有效抵消福利措施带来的工作激励不足问题。文中还讨论了意外的负面影响、制裁的作用以及可能影响最弱势群体及其子女的因果路径。