Wallenborn Jordyn T, Sonephet Souliviengkham, Sayasone Somphou, Siengsounthone Latsamy, Kounnavong Sengchanh, Fink Günther
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Feb 1;179(2):129-136. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.5079.
Rates of exclusive breastfeeding are declining despite the numerous benefits to mothers and their children.
To assess the effectiveness of conditional and unconditional social transfers on exclusive breastfeeding rates and child growth.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a prospective, parallel, 3-armed randomized clinical trial conducted between August 2022 and October 2023. The trial was conducted in 4 districts of Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic. Mothers identified from a large birth cohort were randomized into 2 intervention groups (conditional social transfer or unconditional social transfer) or a control group at a ratio of 1:1:1. Data analysis was conducted from December 2023 to January 2024.
Two interventions were tested: (1) conditional social transfer, in which the mother received the social transfer only if still exclusively breastfeeding at 6 months, and (2) unconditional social transfer, in which the mother received the social transfer at 6 months regardless of breastfeeding status. Mothers in the control group received educational material only.
The primary outcome was the proportion of women exclusively breastfeeding at 6 months post partum. Secondary outcomes included exclusive breastfeeding duration (in months) and child growth (height, weight, and head circumference).
A total of 298 mothers (mean [SD] age, 27.2 [6.5] years) were identified from a large birth cohort and randomized into a conditional social transfer group (n = 100), an unconditional social transfer group (n = 97), or a control group (n = 101). The adjusted odds ratio of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months post partum was 4.60 (95% CI, 2.10-10.07; P < .001) for the conditional social transfer group and 2.51 (95% CI, 1.11-5.66; P = .03) for the unconditional social transfer group compared with the control group. The risk of early exclusive breastfeeding cessation was lower for participants who received the unconditional social transfer (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49-0.92; P = .02) or conditional social transfer (aHR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44-0.83; P = .002) compared with participants in the control group. There were no significant differences between groups for child growth at 6 months post partum.
The findings suggest that social transfers can substantially improve exclusive breastfeeding rates at 6 months post partum, with particularly large benefits for conditional transfers. Continued evaluation at 1, 2, and 3 years post partum will be conducted to assess the long-term outcomes of social transfers on complementary breastfeeding and child health and development over time.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05665049.
尽管纯母乳喂养对母亲及其子女有诸多益处,但纯母乳喂养率仍在下降。
评估有条件和无条件社会转移支付对纯母乳喂养率和儿童生长的有效性。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项前瞻性、平行、三臂随机临床试验,于2022年8月至2023年10月进行。该试验在老挝人民民主共和国万象的4个区开展。从一个大型出生队列中确定的母亲被随机分为2个干预组(有条件社会转移支付组或无条件社会转移支付组)或一个对照组,比例为1:1:1。数据分析于2023年12月至2024年1月进行。
测试了两种干预措施:(1)有条件社会转移支付,即母亲只有在6个月时仍纯母乳喂养才能获得社会转移支付;(2)无条件社会转移支付,即母亲在6个月时无论母乳喂养状况如何均可获得社会转移支付。对照组的母亲仅收到教育材料。
主要结局是产后6个月纯母乳喂养的妇女比例。次要结局包括纯母乳喂养持续时间(以月为单位)和儿童生长情况(身高、体重和头围)。
从一个大型出生队列中确定了298名母亲(平均[标准差]年龄为27.2[6.5]岁),并将其随机分为有条件社会转移支付组(n = 100)、无条件社会转移支付组(n = 97)或对照组(n = 101)。与对照组相比,有条件社会转移支付组产后6个月纯母乳喂养的调整优势比为4.60(95%置信区间,2.10 - 10.07;P <.001),无条件社会转移支付组为2.51(95%置信区间,1.11 - 5.66;P = 0.03)。与对照组参与者相比,接受无条件社会转移支付(调整风险比[aHR],0.68;95%置信区间,0.49 - 0.92;P = 0.02)或有条件社会转移支付(aHR,0.60;95%置信区间,0.44 - 0.83;P = 0.002)的参与者早期停止纯母乳喂养的风险较低。产后6个月时,各组儿童生长情况无显著差异。
研究结果表明,社会转移支付可大幅提高产后6个月的纯母乳喂养率,有条件转移支付的益处尤为显著。将在产后1年、2年和3年继续进行评估,以评估社会转移支付对辅食喂养以及儿童健康和发育的长期影响。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05665049。