• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

决策辅助工具加标准护理在早期乳腺癌手术管理中的效果:一项随机临床试验。

Effectiveness of a Decision Aid Plus Standard Care in Surgical Management Among Patients With Early Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.

Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2335941. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35941.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35941
PMID:37782500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10546236/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Patients with early breast cancer must choose between undergoing breast conservation surgery or mastectomy. This decision is often difficult as there are trade-offs between breast conservation and adverse effects, and women with higher decisional conflict have a harder time choosing the therapy that suits their preferences.

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of a decision aid with a patient preference assessment tool for surgical decision-making on patients' decisional conflict scale (DCS) score.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 3-group randomized clinical trial was conducted between June 2017 and December 2019 at a single high-volume tertiary care cancer center in Mumbai, India. A research questionnaire comprising 16 questions answered on a Likert scale (from 1, strongly agree, to 5, strongly disagree) was used to measure DCS scores and other secondary psychological variables, with higher scores indicating more decisional conflict. The Navya Patient Preference Tool (Navya-PPT) was developed as a survey-based presentation of evidence in an adaptive, conjoint analysis-based module for and trade-offs between cosmesis, adverse effects of radiotherapy, and cost of mandatory radiation following breast-conserving surgery. Adult patients with histologically proven early breast cancer (cT1-2, N0-1) who were eligible for breast-conserving surgery as per clinicoradiological assessment were included. Those who were pregnant or unable to read the research questionnaire or who had bilateral breast cancer were excluded. Data were analyzed from January to June 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to study groups: standard care including clinical explanation about surgery (control), standard care plus the Navya-PPT provided to the patient alone (solo group), and standard care plus the Navya-PPT provided to the patient and a caregiver (joint group).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point of the study was DCS score. The study was 80% powered with 2-sided α = .01 to detect an effect size of 0.25 measured by Cohen d, F test analysis of variance, and fixed effects.

RESULTS

A total of 245 female patients (median [range] age, 48 [23-76] years) were randomized (82 to control, 83 to the solo group, and 80 to the joint group). The median (range) pathological tumor size was 2.5 (0-6) cm. A total of 153 participants (62.4%) had pN0 disease, 185 (75.5%) were hormone receptor positive, 197 (80.4%) were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, 144 (58.6%) were of middle or lower socioeconomic status, and 114 (46.5%) had an education level lower than a college degree. DCS score was significantly reduced in the solo group compared with control (1.34 vs 1.66, respectively; Cohen d, 0.50; SD, 0.31; P < .001) and the joint group compared with control (1.31 vs 1.66, respectively; Cohen d, 0.54; SD, 0.31; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The results of this study demonstrated lower decisional conflict as measured by DCS score following use of the online, self-administered Navya-PPT among patients with early breast cancer choosing between breast-conserving surgery vs mastectomy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials Registry of India Identifier: CTRI/2017/11/010480.

摘要

重要性

早期乳腺癌患者必须在保乳手术和乳房切除术之间做出选择。由于保乳和不良反应之间存在权衡,且决策冲突较高的患者更难以选择符合其偏好的治疗方法,因此这一决策通常较为困难。

目的

研究一种带有患者偏好评估工具的决策辅助工具对手术决策中患者决策冲突量表(DCS)评分的影响。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项 3 组随机临床试验,于 2017 年 6 月至 2019 年 12 月在印度孟买的一家单中心高容量癌症治疗中心进行。使用包含 16 个问题的研究问卷(采用 1-5 分制回答,1 分表示强烈同意,5 分表示强烈不同意)来衡量 DCS 评分和其他次要心理变量,得分越高表示决策冲突越严重。Navya 患者偏好工具(Navya-PPT)是作为一种基于调查的证据呈现方式开发的,采用适应性、联合分析模块来权衡美容效果、放射治疗的不良反应以及保乳手术后强制性放射治疗的成本。纳入符合临床和影像学评估标准、适合行保乳手术的组织学证实的早期乳腺癌(cT1-2、N0-1)成年患者。排除妊娠或无法阅读研究问卷或双侧乳腺癌的患者。数据分析于 2020 年 1 月至 6 月进行。

干预措施

患者以 1:1:1 的比例随机分为 3 组:接受标准护理(包括手术相关的临床解释)的对照组、单独接受 Navya-PPT 的单独组和同时接受 Navya-PPT 和护理人员的联合组。

主要结局和测量指标

本研究的主要终点为 DCS 评分。该研究的效力为 80%,双侧α值为.01,以检测 Cohen d、方差分析 F 检验和固定效应测量的 0.25 效应量。

结果

共纳入 245 名女性患者(中位数[范围]年龄,48[23-76]岁),随机分为对照组(82 人)、单独组(83 人)和联合组(80 人)。中位(范围)病理肿瘤大小为 2.5(0-6)cm。共有 153 名患者(62.4%)患有 pN0 疾病,185 名(75.5%)患者为激素受体阳性,197 名(80.4%)患者为人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性,144 名(58.6%)患者为中低社会经济地位,114 名(46.5%)患者教育水平低于大学程度。与对照组相比,单独组的 DCS 评分明显降低(分别为 1.34 和 1.66,Cohen d 为 0.50,标准差为 0.31,P<0.001),联合组的 DCS 评分也明显降低(分别为 1.31 和 1.66,Cohen d 为 0.54,标准差为 0.31,P<0.001)。

结论和相关性

本研究结果表明,在早期乳腺癌患者中,与保乳手术和乳房切除术相比,使用在线自我管理的 Navya-PPT 可降低 DCS 评分,从而降低决策冲突。

试验注册

印度临床试验注册处标识符:CTRI/2017/11/010480。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e68c/10546236/8fd6f4459784/jamanetwopen-e2335941-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e68c/10546236/8fd6f4459784/jamanetwopen-e2335941-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e68c/10546236/8fd6f4459784/jamanetwopen-e2335941-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a Decision Aid Plus Standard Care in Surgical Management Among Patients With Early Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.决策辅助工具加标准护理在早期乳腺癌手术管理中的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2335941. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35941.
2
Randomized controlled trial on the effect of an online decision aid for young female cancer patients regarding fertility preservation.随机对照试验研究在线决策辅助工具对年轻女性癌症患者生育力保存的效果。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Sep 29;34(9):1726-1734. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez136.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial.决策辅助工具对乳腺癌手术知识及治疗决策的影响:一项随机试验
JAMA. 2004 Jul 28;292(4):435-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.4.435.
5
6
The impact of an online patient decision aid for women with breast cancer considering immediate breast reconstruction: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.一项针对考虑即刻乳房重建的乳腺癌女性的在线患者决策辅助工具的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Aug 19;19(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0873-1.
7
Effect of a decision aid with patient narratives in reducing decisional conflict in choice for surgery among early-stage breast cancer patients: A three-arm randomized controlled trial.一项采用患者叙述的决策辅助工具对早期乳腺癌患者手术选择中决策冲突的影响:一项三臂随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Mar;100(3):550-562. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
8
Effect of patient decision aids on decisional conflict and regret associated with breast cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial.患者决策辅助工具对乳腺癌手术相关决策冲突和后悔的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Breast Cancer. 2022 Sep;29(5):880-888. doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01370-0. Epub 2022 May 19.
9
Reducing Decisional Conflict and Enhancing Satisfaction with Information among Women Considering Breast Reconstruction following Mastectomy: Results from the BRECONDA Randomized Controlled Trial.减少乳房切除术后考虑乳房重建的女性的决策冲突并提高其对信息的满意度:BRECONDA随机对照试验的结果
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Oct;138(4):592e-602e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002538.
10
Patient-Reported Outcomes of Omission of Breast Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.新辅助全身治疗后省略乳房手术的患者报告结局:一项非随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2333933. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.33933.

引用本文的文献

1
The Dyadic Experience of a New Breast Cancer Diagnosis Into the Shared Decision-Making Process: A Qualitative Analysis.新确诊乳腺癌患者融入共同决策过程的二元体验:一项定性分析。
Psychooncology. 2025 Sep;34(9):e70277. doi: 10.1002/pon.70277.
2
Improving lung cancer decision-making using a conversation tool (iDECIDE): a stepped wedge pragmatic clinical trial.使用对话工具(iDECIDE)改善肺癌决策:一项阶梯楔形实用临床试验。
Future Oncol. 2025 Apr;21(9):1045-1056. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2475733. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
3
Social Media as a Platform for Cancer Care Decision-Making Among Women: Internet Survey-Based Study on Trust, Engagement, and Preferences.

本文引用的文献

1
Perception of Breast Reconstruction among 10,299 Indian Women.10299名印度女性对乳房重建的认知
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Apr 15;9(4):e3517. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003517. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
Shared Decision-Making and Medicolegal Aspects: Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care in India.共同决策与法医学方面:在印度提供高质量癌症护理
Indian J Palliat Care. 2020 Oct-Dec;26(4):405-410. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_237_19. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
3
Decision aids on breast conserving surgery for early stage breast cancer patients: a systematic review.
社交媒体作为女性癌症护理决策平台:基于互联网调查的信任、参与度和偏好研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Mar 5;11:e64724. doi: 10.2196/64724.
早期乳腺癌患者保乳手术决策辅助工具:系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 22;20(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01295-8.
4
Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.2017 年至 2100 年 195 个国家和地区的生育率、死亡率、迁移和人口预测情景:全球疾病负担研究的预测分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1285-1306. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30677-2. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
5
Overview of Breast Cancer and Implications of Overtreatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer: An Indian Perspective.乳腺癌概述及早期乳腺癌过度治疗的影响:印度视角
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Jun;6:789-798. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00033.
6
Non-doctoral factors influencing the surgical choice of Chinese patients with breast cancer who were eligible for breast-conserving surgery.影响有保乳手术适应证的中国乳腺癌患者选择手术方式的非医学因素。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov 11;17(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1723-4.
7
Socioeconomic status scales-modified Kuppuswamy and Udai Pareekh's scale updated for 2019.社会经济地位量表——2019年更新的改良库普苏瓦米和乌代·帕雷克量表。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Jun;8(6):1846-1849. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_288_19.
8
Rate of Breast-Conserving Surgery vs Mastectomy in Breast Cancer: a Tertiary Care Centre Experience from South India.乳腺癌保乳手术与乳房切除术的比例:来自印度南部一家三级护理中心的经验
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(1):72-76. doi: 10.1007/s13193-018-0818-7. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
9
What Is the Effectiveness of Patient Decision Aids for Cancer-Related Decisions? A Systematic Review Subanalysis.患者决策辅助工具对癌症相关决策的有效性如何?一项系统评价子分析。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-13. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00148.
10
Breast cancer in a tertiary cancer center in India - An audit, with outcome analysis.印度一家三级癌症中心的乳腺癌——一项带有结果分析的审计。
Indian J Cancer. 2018 Jan-Mar;55(1):16-22. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_484_17.