Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Nov 1;177(11):1158-1167. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.3849.
Modulation of intestinal microbiome by administering probiotics, prebiotics, or both may prevent morbidity and mortality in premature infants.
To assess the comparative effectiveness of alternative prophylactic strategies through a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar from inception until May 10, 2023.
Eligible trials tested probiotics, prebiotics, lactoferrin, and combination products for prevention of morbidity or mortality in preterm infants.
A frequentist random-effects model was used for the NMA, and the certainty of evidence and inferences regarding relative effectiveness were assessed using the GRADE approach.
All-cause mortality, severe necrotizing enterocolitis, culture-proven sepsis, feeding intolerance, time to reach full enteral feeding, and duration of hospitalization.
A total of 106 trials involving 25 840 preterm infants were included. Only multiple-strain probiotics were associated with reduced all-cause mortality compared with placebo (risk ratio [RR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.86; risk difference [RD], -1.7%; 95% CI, -2.4% to -0.8%). Multiple-strain probiotics alone (vs placebo: RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.50; RD, -3.7%; 95% CI, -4.1% to -2.9%) or in combination with oligosaccharides (vs placebo: RR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.37; RD, -5.1%; 95% CI, -5.6% to -3.7%) were among the most effective interventions reducing severe necrotizing enterocolitis. Single-strain probiotics in combination with lactoferrin (vs placebo RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.78; RD, -10.7%; 95% CI, -13.7% to -3.5%) were the most effective intervention for reducing sepsis. Multiple-strain probiotics alone (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.80; RD, -10.0%; 95% CI, -13.9% to -5.1%) or in combination with oligosaccharides (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.67; RD, -14.1%; 95% CI, -18.3% to -8.5%) and single-strain probiotics (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.72; RD, -10.0%; 95% CI, -12.6% to -7.2%) proved of best effectiveness in reduction of feeding intolerance vs placebo. Single-strain probiotics (MD, -1.94 days; 95% CI, -2.96 to -0.92) and multistrain probiotics (MD, -2.03 days; 95% CI, -3.04 to -1.02) proved the most effective in reducing the time to reach full enteral feeding compared with placebo. Only single-strain and multistrain probiotics were associated with greater effectiveness compared with placebo in reducing duration of hospitalization (MD, -3.31 days; 95% CI, -5.05 to -1.58; and MD, -2.20 days; 95% CI, -4.08 to -0.31, respectively).
In this systematic review and NMA, moderate- to high-certainty evidence demonstrated an association between multistrain probiotics and reduction in all-cause mortality; these interventions were also associated with the best effectiveness for other key outcomes. Combination products, including single- and multiple-strain probiotics combined with prebiotics or lactoferrin, were associated with the largest reduction in morbidity and mortality.
通过给予益生菌、益生元或两者兼用来调节肠道微生物群可能预防早产儿的发病率和死亡率。
通过对随机临床试验的网络荟萃分析 (NMA) 来评估替代预防策略的比较效果。
从创建到 2023 年 5 月 10 日,在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、科学引文索引扩展版、CINAHL、Scopus、Cochrane 中心、Google Scholar 上进行了检索。
合格的试验测试了益生菌、益生元、乳铁蛋白和联合产品预防早产儿发病率或死亡率的效果。
使用频率论随机效应模型进行 NMA,并使用 GRADE 方法评估证据的确定性和相对有效性的推论。
全因死亡率、严重坏死性小肠结肠炎、培养证实的败血症、喂养不耐受、达到完全肠内喂养的时间和住院时间。
共纳入 106 项涉及 25840 名早产儿的试验。与安慰剂相比,只有多种菌株益生菌与全因死亡率降低相关(风险比 [RR],0.69;95%CI,0.56 至 0.86;风险差异 [RD],-1.7%;95%CI,-2.4%至-0.8%)。单独使用多种菌株益生菌(与安慰剂相比:RR,0.38;95%CI,0.30 至 0.50;RD,-3.7%;95%CI,-4.1%至-2.9%)或与低聚糖联合使用(与安慰剂相比:RR,0.13;95%CI,0.05 至 0.37;RD,-5.1%;95%CI,-5.6%至-3.7%)是降低严重坏死性小肠结肠炎最有效的干预措施之一。单独使用单一菌株益生菌与乳铁蛋白联合使用(与安慰剂相比:RR,0.33;95%CI,0.14 至 0.78;RD,-10.7%;95%CI,-13.7%至-3.5%)是降低败血症最有效的干预措施之一。单独使用多种菌株益生菌(RR,0.61;95%CI,0.46 至 0.80;RD,-10.0%;95%CI,-13.9%至-5.1%)或与低聚糖联合使用(RR,0.45;95%CI,0.29 至 0.67;RD,-14.1%;95%CI,-18.3%至-8.5%)和单独使用单一菌株益生菌(RR,0.61;95%CI,0.51 至 0.72;RD,-10.0%;95%CI,-12.6%至-7.2%)在降低喂养不耐受方面证明是最有效的,与安慰剂相比。与安慰剂相比,单一菌株益生菌(MD,-1.94 天;95%CI,-2.96 至-0.92)和多种菌株益生菌(MD,-2.03 天;95%CI,-3.04 至-1.02)在减少达到完全肠内喂养的时间方面最有效。只有单一菌株和多种菌株益生菌在减少住院时间方面与安慰剂相比具有更大的效果(MD,-3.31 天;95%CI,-5.05 至-1.58;和 MD,-2.20 天;95%CI,-4.08 至-0.31)。
在这项系统评价和 NMA 中,具有中至高确定性的证据表明,多种菌株益生菌与降低全因死亡率之间存在关联;这些干预措施对于其他关键结局也具有最佳效果。包括单一和多种菌株益生菌与益生元或乳铁蛋白联合使用的组合产品与降低发病率和死亡率的效果最大。