Suppr超能文献

益生菌、益生元、乳铁蛋白及联合制剂预防早产儿病死率和发病的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Probiotics, Prebiotics, Lactoferrin, and Combination Products for Prevention of Mortality and Morbidity in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.

出版信息

JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Nov 1;177(11):1158-1167. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.3849.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Modulation of intestinal microbiome by administering probiotics, prebiotics, or both may prevent morbidity and mortality in premature infants.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the comparative effectiveness of alternative prophylactic strategies through a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar from inception until May 10, 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Eligible trials tested probiotics, prebiotics, lactoferrin, and combination products for prevention of morbidity or mortality in preterm infants.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

A frequentist random-effects model was used for the NMA, and the certainty of evidence and inferences regarding relative effectiveness were assessed using the GRADE approach.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

All-cause mortality, severe necrotizing enterocolitis, culture-proven sepsis, feeding intolerance, time to reach full enteral feeding, and duration of hospitalization.

RESULTS

A total of 106 trials involving 25 840 preterm infants were included. Only multiple-strain probiotics were associated with reduced all-cause mortality compared with placebo (risk ratio [RR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.86; risk difference [RD], -1.7%; 95% CI, -2.4% to -0.8%). Multiple-strain probiotics alone (vs placebo: RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.50; RD, -3.7%; 95% CI, -4.1% to -2.9%) or in combination with oligosaccharides (vs placebo: RR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.37; RD, -5.1%; 95% CI, -5.6% to -3.7%) were among the most effective interventions reducing severe necrotizing enterocolitis. Single-strain probiotics in combination with lactoferrin (vs placebo RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.78; RD, -10.7%; 95% CI, -13.7% to -3.5%) were the most effective intervention for reducing sepsis. Multiple-strain probiotics alone (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.80; RD, -10.0%; 95% CI, -13.9% to -5.1%) or in combination with oligosaccharides (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.67; RD, -14.1%; 95% CI, -18.3% to -8.5%) and single-strain probiotics (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.72; RD, -10.0%; 95% CI, -12.6% to -7.2%) proved of best effectiveness in reduction of feeding intolerance vs placebo. Single-strain probiotics (MD, -1.94 days; 95% CI, -2.96 to -0.92) and multistrain probiotics (MD, -2.03 days; 95% CI, -3.04 to -1.02) proved the most effective in reducing the time to reach full enteral feeding compared with placebo. Only single-strain and multistrain probiotics were associated with greater effectiveness compared with placebo in reducing duration of hospitalization (MD, -3.31 days; 95% CI, -5.05 to -1.58; and MD, -2.20 days; 95% CI, -4.08 to -0.31, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this systematic review and NMA, moderate- to high-certainty evidence demonstrated an association between multistrain probiotics and reduction in all-cause mortality; these interventions were also associated with the best effectiveness for other key outcomes. Combination products, including single- and multiple-strain probiotics combined with prebiotics or lactoferrin, were associated with the largest reduction in morbidity and mortality.

摘要

重要性

通过给予益生菌、益生元或两者兼用来调节肠道微生物群可能预防早产儿的发病率和死亡率。

目的

通过对随机临床试验的网络荟萃分析 (NMA) 来评估替代预防策略的比较效果。

数据来源

从创建到 2023 年 5 月 10 日,在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、科学引文索引扩展版、CINAHL、Scopus、Cochrane 中心、Google Scholar 上进行了检索。

研究选择

合格的试验测试了益生菌、益生元、乳铁蛋白和联合产品预防早产儿发病率或死亡率的效果。

数据提取和综合

使用频率论随机效应模型进行 NMA,并使用 GRADE 方法评估证据的确定性和相对有效性的推论。

主要结局和措施

全因死亡率、严重坏死性小肠结肠炎、培养证实的败血症、喂养不耐受、达到完全肠内喂养的时间和住院时间。

结果

共纳入 106 项涉及 25840 名早产儿的试验。与安慰剂相比,只有多种菌株益生菌与全因死亡率降低相关(风险比 [RR],0.69;95%CI,0.56 至 0.86;风险差异 [RD],-1.7%;95%CI,-2.4%至-0.8%)。单独使用多种菌株益生菌(与安慰剂相比:RR,0.38;95%CI,0.30 至 0.50;RD,-3.7%;95%CI,-4.1%至-2.9%)或与低聚糖联合使用(与安慰剂相比:RR,0.13;95%CI,0.05 至 0.37;RD,-5.1%;95%CI,-5.6%至-3.7%)是降低严重坏死性小肠结肠炎最有效的干预措施之一。单独使用单一菌株益生菌与乳铁蛋白联合使用(与安慰剂相比:RR,0.33;95%CI,0.14 至 0.78;RD,-10.7%;95%CI,-13.7%至-3.5%)是降低败血症最有效的干预措施之一。单独使用多种菌株益生菌(RR,0.61;95%CI,0.46 至 0.80;RD,-10.0%;95%CI,-13.9%至-5.1%)或与低聚糖联合使用(RR,0.45;95%CI,0.29 至 0.67;RD,-14.1%;95%CI,-18.3%至-8.5%)和单独使用单一菌株益生菌(RR,0.61;95%CI,0.51 至 0.72;RD,-10.0%;95%CI,-12.6%至-7.2%)在降低喂养不耐受方面证明是最有效的,与安慰剂相比。与安慰剂相比,单一菌株益生菌(MD,-1.94 天;95%CI,-2.96 至-0.92)和多种菌株益生菌(MD,-2.03 天;95%CI,-3.04 至-1.02)在减少达到完全肠内喂养的时间方面最有效。只有单一菌株和多种菌株益生菌在减少住院时间方面与安慰剂相比具有更大的效果(MD,-3.31 天;95%CI,-5.05 至-1.58;和 MD,-2.20 天;95%CI,-4.08 至-0.31)。

结论和相关性

在这项系统评价和 NMA 中,具有中至高确定性的证据表明,多种菌株益生菌与降低全因死亡率之间存在关联;这些干预措施对于其他关键结局也具有最佳效果。包括单一和多种菌株益生菌与益生元或乳铁蛋白联合使用的组合产品与降低发病率和死亡率的效果最大。

相似文献

2
Enteral lactoferrin supplementation for prevention of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 28;6(6):CD007137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007137.pub5.
3
Synbiotics to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very preterm or very low birth weight infants.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 1;3(3):CD014067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014067.pub2.
4
Early treatment versus expectant management of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus for preterm infants.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 23;6(6):CD013278. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013278.pub3.
5
Oral lactoferrin for the prevention of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD007137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007137.pub2.
6
Ibuprofen for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm and/or low birth weight infants.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD003481. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003481.pub3.
7
Probiotics for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD005496. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005496.pub2.
8
Synbiotics, prebiotics and probiotics for people with chronic kidney disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 23;10(10):CD013631. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013631.pub2.
9
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
10
Early erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in preterm or low birth weight infants.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 16;11(11):CD004863. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004863.pub5.

引用本文的文献

1
Microbiome-mediated colonization resistance to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in ICU patients.
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2025 Aug 9;11(1):157. doi: 10.1038/s41522-025-00791-x.
3
Risks and benefits of probiotics for preterm neonates: threshold of comfort or fear?
Pediatr Res. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-04267-8.
4
Current state of microbiota clinical applications in neonatal and pediatric bacterial infections.
Gut Microbes. 2025 Dec;17(1):2529400. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2529400. Epub 2025 Jul 6.
5
Unveiling the Growth Impact of Probiotics in Neonates: To BEgin or Not to BEgin?
Nutrients. 2025 May 29;17(11):1867. doi: 10.3390/nu17111867.
6
Neonatal Invasive Candidiasis: Current Concepts.
Indian J Pediatr. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s12098-025-05593-9.
7
Present and future of microbiome-targeting therapeutics.
J Clin Invest. 2025 Jun 2;135(11). doi: 10.1172/JCI184323.
8
Opportunities for microbiome-based therapeutics in preterm infants.
Nat Microbiol. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1038/s41564-025-02010-x.
9
Incidence of probiotic sepsis and morbidity risk in premature infants: a meta-analysis.
Pediatr Res. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-04072-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验