Suppr超能文献

#MeToo运动之后男性与女性之间的科学合作趋势

Trends in Scientific Collaboration Between Men and Women Following the #MeToo Movement.

作者信息

Zimerman André, Rotenstein Lisa S, Jena Anupam B

机构信息

TIMI Study Group, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Feb;39(2):201-206. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08441-8. Epub 2023 Oct 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The #MeToo movement raised global awareness about harassment in the workplace. Concerns were raised, however, that the movement may have unintendedly harmed women in academia by decreasing collaboration invitations from men in senior positions, who might be more reluctant to collaborate.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze whether collaborations between first author women and last author men decreased after the #MeToo movement.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

PARTICIPANTS

Names of first and last authors of 122,450 US review articles from the PubMed database published between 2014 and 2020.

MAIN MEASURES

Change in the proportion of review articles with a first author woman and a last author man following the peak of the #MeToo movement in October 2017. Additionally, among review articles with a last author man, trends of women first authorship in the USA and Europe (control group) were compared.

KEY RESULTS

We analyzed 122,450 review articles with first and last authors from US institutions. Of 85,015 articles by a man last author, 37.5% (31,902) had a woman first author. In contrast, when the last author was a woman, the first author was also a woman in 53.6% of articles (20,078) (p<0.001 for difference). Among review articles with a last author man, there was no change in the proportion of articles with a woman first author before versus after the peak of the #MeToo movement (e.g., p=0.13 for difference between the 12 months following October 2017 compared to the pre-#Me-too period). Among European institutions, of 72,036 articles by a man last author, 43.4% (31,294) had a woman first author, higher than the proportion observed in the USA. Trends in collaboration between first author women and last author men were similar in the USA and Europe after the peak of the #MeToo movement (p=0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

The #MeToo movement was not associated with a reduction in the rate of scientific review article authorship collaborations between first author women and last author men in the life sciences. These findings, if generalizable, suggest it is possible to promote accountability for harassment in the workplace without limiting decreases in collaboration.

摘要

背景

#MeToo运动提高了全球对职场骚扰的认识。然而,有人担心该运动可能无意中伤害了学术界的女性,因为高级职位的男性发出的合作邀请减少了,而这些男性可能更不愿意合作。

目的

分析#MeToo运动后第一作者为女性且最后作者为男性的合作情况是否减少。

设计

回顾性观察研究。

参与者

来自PubMed数据库2014年至2020年发表的122450篇美国综述文章的第一作者和最后作者姓名。

主要指标

2017年10月#MeToo运动达到顶峰后,第一作者为女性且最后作者为男性的综述文章比例的变化。此外,在最后作者为男性的综述文章中,比较了美国和欧洲(对照组)女性第一作者的趋势。

关键结果

我们分析了122450篇来自美国机构的第一作者和最后作者的综述文章。在85015篇最后作者为男性的文章中,37.5%(31902篇)的第一作者为女性。相比之下,当最后作者为女性时,53.6%的文章(20078篇)第一作者也是女性(差异p<0.001)。在最后作者为男性的综述文章中,#MeToo运动达到顶峰前后,第一作者为女性的文章比例没有变化(例如,2017年10月后的12个月与#MeToo运动前相比,差异p=0.13)。在欧洲机构中,在72036篇最后作者为男性的文章中,43.4%(31294篇)的第一作者为女性,高于美国的比例。#MeToo运动达到顶峰后,美国和欧洲第一作者为女性且最后作者为男性的合作趋势相似(p=0.65)。

结论

#MeToo运动与生命科学领域第一作者为女性且最后作者为男性的科学综述文章作者合作率的降低无关。如果这些发现具有普遍性,表明在不限制合作减少的情况下,有可能促进对职场骚扰的问责。

相似文献

1
Trends in Scientific Collaboration Between Men and Women Following the #MeToo Movement.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Feb;39(2):201-206. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08441-8. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
2
Analysis of authorship trends in vascular surgery demonstrates a sticky surgical floor for women.
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.228. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
4
Trends in Authorship of Articles in Major Ophthalmology Journals by Gender, 2002-2014.
Ophthalmology. 2016 Aug;123(8):1824-1828. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.04.034. Epub 2016 May 22.
7
Female Authors in Nuclear Medicine Journals: A Survey from 2014 to 2020.
J Nucl Med. 2022 Jul;63(7):995-1000. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262773. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
8
Analysis of Gender-Based Authorship Trends in Leading Pain-Medicine Journals Over 10 Years.
Health Psychol Res. 2022 Nov 3;10(4):38356. doi: 10.52965/001c.38356. eCollection 2022.
9

本文引用的文献

1
Publishing particulars: Part 1. The big picture.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2023 Mar 1;324(3):R381-R392. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00265.2022. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
2
Authorship Trends and Disparities in Cardiothoracic Surgery.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Dec;116(6):1329-1334. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.09.046. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
3
Association between women's authorship and women's editorship in infectious diseases journals: a cross-sectional study.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Oct;22(10):1455-1464. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00367-X. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
4
Longitudinal analyses of gender differences in first authorship publications related to COVID-19.
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 5;11(4):e045176. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045176.
6
Female Authorship in Preclinical Cardiovascular Research: Temporal Trends and Influence on Experimental Design.
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2019 Aug 26;4(4):471-477. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.04.004. eCollection 2019 Aug.
7
Can #MeToo abolish sexual harassment and discrimination in medicine?
Lancet. 2019 Aug 3;394(10196):383-384. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31731-3.
8
Assessment of Women Physicians Among Authors of Perspective-Type Articles Published in High-Impact Pediatric Journals.
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jul 6;1(3):e180802. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0802.
9
Men's Fear of Mentoring in the #MeToo Era - What's at Stake for Academic Medicine?
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 6;379(23):2270-2274. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1805743. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
10
The #MeToo movement: an opportunity in public health?
Lancet. 2018 Jun 30;391(10140):2587-2589. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30991-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验