HISP Centre, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
HISP Africa, Tanga, Tanzania.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 2;23(1):1049. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09914-6.
Routine Health Information Systems data should be used in a systematic and institutionalised manner to support the making of plans, the monitoring of plans and in supportive supervision. To explore to what extent there is discussion about the linkage between planning, monitoring and supervision of sub-national programs using routine data we conducted a scoping review. The review question was: How are routine health information systems used in developing and monitoring health plans at district and facility level?
From a search of Ovid Medline (all), EMBASE and Web of Science along with a review of grey literature and involving a number of key stakeholders in identifying any missing resources a total of over 2200 documents were reviewed and data from 13 documents were extracted.
Overall, there are many descriptions of how to implement and strengthen systems, ways to assess and improve data availability and quality, tools to improve the data use context, training in data use and mechanisms to involve stakeholders and strengthen infrastructure. However, there are gaps in examples of routine health data being used in the development, monitoring and supervision of plans at district and facility level.
There appears to be no institutionalised obligation of planners to monitor plans, very little guidance on how to practically monitor programs and minimal discussion about how to use the routinely available data to supportively supervise the implementation of the plans. To overcome these shortcomings, we recommend that practical procedures to ensure linkage of existing district plans to regular monitoring of priority programs are institutionalised, that mechanisms for making managers institutionally accountable for monitoring and supervising these plans are put in place, and that practical guidelines for linking plans with routine health information system data and regular monitoring and supportive supervision are developed.
常规卫生信息系统数据应当以系统和制度化的方式加以利用,为规划、规划监测以及支持性监督提供支持。本研究旨在探讨在多大程度上利用常规数据讨论国家以下各级规划、监测和监督之间的联系,为此我们开展了范围综述。综述问题为:常规卫生信息系统如何用于制定和监测地区及机构层面的卫生规划?
通过对 Ovid Medline(所有)、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 的检索,以及对灰色文献的审查,并通过与一些利益攸关方合作,以确定任何遗漏的资源,共审查了 2200 多篇文献,并从 13 篇文献中提取了数据。
总体而言,有许多关于如何实施和加强系统的描述,有评估和提高数据可用性和质量的方法,有改善数据使用背景的工具,有数据使用培训,还有让利益攸关方参与和加强基础设施的机制。但是,在利用常规卫生数据制定、监测和监督地区及机构层面规划方面,存在着实例不足的情况。
规划者似乎没有监测规划的制度化义务,关于如何实际监测规划的指导很少,关于如何利用可获得的常规数据支持性监督规划实施的讨论也很少。为了克服这些不足,我们建议将确保现有地区规划与定期监测优先方案相衔接的实用程序制度化,建立让管理人员对监测和监督这些规划承担机构责任的机制,并制定将规划与常规卫生信息系统数据以及定期监测和支持性监督相联系的实用指南。