The McPin Foundation, London, UK.
Traumascapes, London, UK.
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13868. doi: 10.1111/hex.13868. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
Associations between structural inequalities and health are well established. However, there is limited work examining this link in relation to mental health, or that centres public perspectives. This study explores people's experience and sense-making of inequality in their daily lives, with particular consideration of impacts on mental health.
We conducted a peer research study. Participants had to live in one of two London Boroughs and have an interest in inequalities and mental health. Using social media, newsletters, local organisations and our peer researchers' contacts, we recruited 30 participants who took photos representing their experience of inequality and discussed them during semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Three themes were identified in this study: (1) inequalities are unjust, multilayered and intertwined with mental health. Accounts demonstrated a deep understanding of inequalities and their link to mental health outcomes, describing inequalities as 'suffering' and 'not good for anyone'. Financial, housing, immigration and healthcare problems exacerbated poor mental health, with racism, gender-based violence and job loss also contributing factors for both poor mental health and experiences of inequality; (2) inequalities exclude and have far-reaching mental health consequences, impacting personal sense of belonging and perceived societal value and (3) moving forwards-addressing long-standing inequality and poor public mental health necessitated coping and resilience strategies that are often unacknowledged and undervalued by support systems.
Lived experience expertise was central in this study, creating an innovative methodological approach. To improve public mental health, we must address the everyday, painful structural inequalities experienced by many as commonplace and unfair. New policies and strategies must be found that involve communities, redistributing resources and power, building on a collective knowledge base, to coproduce actions combatting inequalities and improving population mental health.
This study was peer-led, designed and carried out by researchers who had experiences of poor mental health. Six authors of the paper worked as peer researchers on this study.
结构性不平等与健康之间的关联已得到充分证实。然而,针对心理健康或关注公众观点的相关研究还很有限。本研究探讨了人们在日常生活中对不平等的体验和理解方式,特别考虑了其对心理健康的影响。
我们进行了一项同伴研究。参与者必须居住在伦敦的两个行政区之一,并对不平等和心理健康有兴趣。我们利用社交媒体、时事通讯、当地组织以及我们的同伴研究人员的联系,招募了 30 名参与者,他们拍摄了代表自己不平等体验的照片,并在半结构化访谈中对这些照片进行了讨论。我们使用反思性主题分析方法对数据进行了分析。
本研究确定了三个主题:(1)不平等是不公正的、多层次的,且与心理健康交织在一起。研究结果表明,参与者对不平等及其与心理健康结果之间的联系有着深刻的理解,他们将不平等描述为“痛苦”和“对任何人都不好”。财务、住房、移民和医疗保健问题加剧了心理健康不良,种族主义、性别暴力和失业也是心理健康不良和不平等体验的因素;(2)不平等会排斥他人,并对心理健康产生深远影响,影响个人归属感和社会价值感;(3)向前推进——解决长期存在的不平等和公众心理健康不良问题,需要应对和恢复力策略,而这些策略通常未得到支持系统的承认和重视。
本研究的核心是参与者的生活经验专业知识,这种方法具有创新性。为了改善公众心理健康,我们必须解决许多人认为普遍存在且不公平的日常痛苦的结构性不平等问题。必须找到新的政策和策略,让社区参与进来,重新分配资源和权力,利用集体知识库,共同制定对抗不平等和改善人口心理健康的行动。
这项研究由经历过心理健康不良的研究人员领导、设计和实施,是一项同行主导的研究。本文的六位作者在这项研究中担任了同行研究人员。