Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
Private Practice, Antalya, Turkey.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024 Apr;27(2):251-258. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12714. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
To evaluate stability outcomes and failure rates associated with four types of lingual retainers: (1) dead-soft wire, (2) multistrand stainless steel (SS) wire, (3) CAD/CAM nitinol, and (4) connected bonding pads (CBPs) after 3 years of retention.
This study enrolled 96 patients (66 females, 30 males) with a median age of 19 years with four types of lingual retainers: (1) 0.016 × 0.022-inch dead-soft wire, (2) 0.0215-inch five-strand SS wire, (3) 0.014 × 0.014-inch CAD/CAM nitinol wire, and (4) CBPs. The irregularity index, intercanine distances, and arch lengths were obtained and used to evaluate mandibular stability. Failure rates were also assessed during this study. Data were statistically analysed.
Irregularity increased, whereas intercanine width and arch length decreased after 3 years of retention. The greatest irregularity was associated with the CBPs and the least with the CAD/CAM retainers. Changes in stability measurements were significantly higher in the dead-soft wire and CBPs than those in the CAD/CAM nitinol and multistrand SS wires. Parallel to these changes, the frequency of failure yielded similar results with the same significance between the groups. The failure rate of CBPs, in contrast to the CAD/CAM nitinol and multistrand SS wires, was significantly higher in the right quadrant (P < .05).
After taking the 3-year results into consideration, CAD/CAM nitinol and multistrand SS wires were found to be more successful than the others in maintaining mandibular stability. The most failures were observed with CBPs after 3 years of retention.
评估四种类型的舌侧保持器(1)超软丝、(2)多股不锈钢丝、(3)CAD/CAM 镍钛合金和(4)连接粘接垫(CBP)在保持 3 年后的稳定性结果和失败率。
本研究纳入了 96 名患者(66 名女性,30 名男性),年龄中位数为 19 岁,使用四种类型的舌侧保持器:(1)0.016×0.022 英寸超软丝、(2)0.0215 英寸五股不锈钢丝、(3)0.014×0.014 英寸 CAD/CAM 镍钛合金丝和(4)CBP。测量了不规则指数、尖牙间宽度和弓长,用于评估下颌稳定性。本研究还评估了失败率。对数据进行了统计学分析。
保持 3 年后,不规则性增加,而尖牙间宽度和弓长减小。CBP 的不规则性最大,CAD/CAM 保持器的不规则性最小。在超软丝和 CBP 中,稳定性测量的变化明显高于 CAD/CAM 镍钛合金和多股不锈钢丝。与这些变化平行的是,各组之间的失败频率也具有相同的显著意义。与 CAD/CAM 镍钛合金和多股不锈钢丝相比,CBP 的失败率在右象限显著更高(P<.05)。
考虑到 3 年的结果,CAD/CAM 镍钛合金和多股不锈钢丝在保持下颌稳定性方面比其他保持器更成功。CBP 在保持 3 年后的失败率最高。