• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3 年固定保持期的稳定性和失败率:一项针对青少年四种不同舌侧保持器的随机临床试验的随访。

Stability and failure rate during 3 years of fixed retention: A follow-up of an randomized clinical trial on adolescents with four different lingual retainers.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.

Private Practice, Antalya, Turkey.

出版信息

Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024 Apr;27(2):251-258. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12714. Epub 2023 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1111/ocr.12714
PMID:37786933
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate stability outcomes and failure rates associated with four types of lingual retainers: (1) dead-soft wire, (2) multistrand stainless steel (SS) wire, (3) CAD/CAM nitinol, and (4) connected bonding pads (CBPs) after 3 years of retention.

METHODS

This study enrolled 96 patients (66 females, 30 males) with a median age of 19 years with four types of lingual retainers: (1) 0.016 × 0.022-inch dead-soft wire, (2) 0.0215-inch five-strand SS wire, (3) 0.014 × 0.014-inch CAD/CAM nitinol wire, and (4) CBPs. The irregularity index, intercanine distances, and arch lengths were obtained and used to evaluate mandibular stability. Failure rates were also assessed during this study. Data were statistically analysed.

RESULTS

Irregularity increased, whereas intercanine width and arch length decreased after 3 years of retention. The greatest irregularity was associated with the CBPs and the least with the CAD/CAM retainers. Changes in stability measurements were significantly higher in the dead-soft wire and CBPs than those in the CAD/CAM nitinol and multistrand SS wires. Parallel to these changes, the frequency of failure yielded similar results with the same significance between the groups. The failure rate of CBPs, in contrast to the CAD/CAM nitinol and multistrand SS wires, was significantly higher in the right quadrant (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

After taking the 3-year results into consideration, CAD/CAM nitinol and multistrand SS wires were found to be more successful than the others in maintaining mandibular stability. The most failures were observed with CBPs after 3 years of retention.

摘要

目的

评估四种类型的舌侧保持器(1)超软丝、(2)多股不锈钢丝、(3)CAD/CAM 镍钛合金和(4)连接粘接垫(CBP)在保持 3 年后的稳定性结果和失败率。

方法

本研究纳入了 96 名患者(66 名女性,30 名男性),年龄中位数为 19 岁,使用四种类型的舌侧保持器:(1)0.016×0.022 英寸超软丝、(2)0.0215 英寸五股不锈钢丝、(3)0.014×0.014 英寸 CAD/CAM 镍钛合金丝和(4)CBP。测量了不规则指数、尖牙间宽度和弓长,用于评估下颌稳定性。本研究还评估了失败率。对数据进行了统计学分析。

结果

保持 3 年后,不规则性增加,而尖牙间宽度和弓长减小。CBP 的不规则性最大,CAD/CAM 保持器的不规则性最小。在超软丝和 CBP 中,稳定性测量的变化明显高于 CAD/CAM 镍钛合金和多股不锈钢丝。与这些变化平行的是,各组之间的失败频率也具有相同的显著意义。与 CAD/CAM 镍钛合金和多股不锈钢丝相比,CBP 的失败率在右象限显著更高(P<.05)。

结论

考虑到 3 年的结果,CAD/CAM 镍钛合金和多股不锈钢丝在保持下颌稳定性方面比其他保持器更成功。CBP 在保持 3 年后的失败率最高。

相似文献

1
Stability and failure rate during 3 years of fixed retention: A follow-up of an randomized clinical trial on adolescents with four different lingual retainers.3 年固定保持期的稳定性和失败率:一项针对青少年四种不同舌侧保持器的随机临床试验的随访。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024 Apr;27(2):251-258. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12714. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
2
Gingival health and relapse tendency: a prospective study of two types of lower fixed retainers.牙龈健康与复发倾向:两种类型下颌固定保持器的前瞻性研究
Aust Orthod J. 2009 Nov;25(2):142-6.
3
Clinical effectiveness of 2 orthodontic retainer wires on mandibular arch retention.两种正畸保持丝在下颌牙弓保持中的临床效果。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Feb;153(2):232-238. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.06.019.
4
Comparative assessment of relapse and failure between CAD/CAM stainless steel and standard stainless steel fixed retainers in orthodontic retention patients.CAD/CAM 不锈钢和标准不锈钢固定保持器在正畸保持患者中复发和失败的比较评估。
Angle Orthod. 2022 Jan 1;92(1):87-94. doi: 10.2319/121720-1015.1.
5
Effects of different lingual retainers on periodontal health and stability.不同舌侧保持器对牙周健康和稳定性的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2021 Jul 1;91(4):468-476. doi: 10.2319/110220-904.1.
6
Relapse and failure rates between CAD/CAM and conventional fixed retainers: a 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial.计算机辅助设计与制造(CAD/CAM)固定保持器和传统固定保持器的复发率及失败率:一项随机对照临床试验的2年随访
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Jan 1;46(1). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjad079.
7
"Clinical comparison of bond failure rate between two types of mandibular canine-canine bonded orthodontic retainers- a randomized clinical trial".“两种下颌尖牙-尖牙粘接式保持器的粘接失败率临床比较——一项随机临床试验”。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01167-7.
8
Comparing the effects of CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainers on teeth stability and periodontal health with conventional fixed and removable retainers: A randomized clinical trial.比较 CAD/CAM 镍钛舌侧保持器、传统固定保持器和可摘保持器对牙齿稳定性和牙周健康的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 May;24(2):241-250. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12425. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
9
Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) versus dead-soft coaxial bonded retainers: a randomized clinical trial. Part 1. Stability, retainer failure, and participant satisfaction.聚醚醚酮(PEEK)与超弹性同轴粘结保持器的对比:一项随机临床试验。第 1 部分。稳定性、保持器失败和患者满意度。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Oct 1;46(5). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae044.
10
Clinical comparison between Multi-Stranded Wires and Single strand Ribbon wires used for lingual fixed retainers.多股金属丝与单股扁丝在舌侧固定保持器中的临床比较。
Prog Orthod. 2020 Jun 29;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40510-020-00315-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of fixed orthodontic lingual retainers on PDL stress, root resorption risk, and tooth displacement.固定正畸舌侧保持器对牙周膜应力、牙根吸收风险和牙齿移位的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20559. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06004-x.
2
Debonding forces and failure modes of customized three-dimensional printed nano-ceramic hybrid resin fixed lingual retainers.定制三维打印纳米陶瓷复合树脂固定舌侧保持器的脱粘力及失效模式
J Orthod Sci. 2025 Mar 25;14:2. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_75_24. eCollection 2025.
3
Accuracy of lingual fixed retainers fabricated using a CAD/CAM bending machine.
使用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)弯曲机制作的舌侧固定保持器的准确性。
Korean J Orthod. 2024 Jul 25;54(4):257-263. doi: 10.4041/kjod24.078. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
4
Stability, survival, patient satisfaction, and cost-minimization of CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 2-year follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled trial.CAD/CAM 与传统多股弓丝固定保持器在正畸患者中的稳定性、存活率、患者满意度和成本最小化:一项为期 2 年的双中心随机对照试验的随访。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Apr 1;46(2). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae006.