• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定制三维打印纳米陶瓷复合树脂固定舌侧保持器的脱粘力及失效模式

Debonding forces and failure modes of customized three-dimensional printed nano-ceramic hybrid resin fixed lingual retainers.

作者信息

Alnuaimy Noor S, Alhuwaizi Akram F

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

出版信息

J Orthod Sci. 2025 Mar 25;14:2. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_75_24. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.4103/jos.jos_75_24
PMID:40302879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12036752/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Retention preserves the optimal esthetic and functional positions of teeth following the termination of active orthodontic treatment. Conventional stainless-steel multistrand fixed retainers have limitations and drawbacks, mainly related to retainer failure.

OBJECTIVES

Nano-ceramic hybrid resin (SprintRay OnX) was employed to fabricate new, customized three-dimensional (3D)-printed lingual retainers, and their debonding forces and failure modes were evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pairs of premolars were embedded in acrylic blocks. Fifty acrylic blocks were divided into five groups, including three different cross-sections of customized 3D-printed wires- round (1 mm), oval (1 × 1.5 mm), and semi-elliptical (1 × 1.5 mm)- and comparative stainless steel multistrand retainers (G and H and Respond). Retainers were bonded to the teeth using Transbond™ LR Light Cure Adhesive. The models were stored in distilled water for 24 hours, simulating the wet intraoral conditions. Debonding forces and failure modes were then evaluated. A vertical debonding force was applied to the interdental area of the bonded retainer. Post-retainer debonding failure mode was examined under a stereomicroscope (×10 magnification).

RESULTS

Semi-elliptical 3D-printed retainers yielded the highest debonding forces, followed by oval 3D-printed retainers, twisted G and H retainers, round 3D-printed retainers, and Respond retainers. The debonding forces of oval and semi-elliptical 3D-printed retainers did not differ significantly. The 3D-printed retainer groups presented predominantly cohesive failure due to the strong adhesion between the 3D-printed resin and adhesive.

CONCLUSION

Oval and semi-elliptical 3D-printed retainers exhibited favorable debonding forces.

摘要

背景

保持是在主动正畸治疗结束后维持牙齿最佳美观和功能位置的方法。传统的不锈钢多股固定保持器存在局限性和缺点,主要与保持器失败有关。

目的

采用纳米陶瓷混合树脂(SprintRay OnX)制作新型定制三维(3D)打印舌侧保持器,并评估其脱粘力和失败模式。

材料与方法

将成对的前磨牙嵌入丙烯酸块中。50个丙烯酸块分为五组,包括三种不同横截面的定制3D打印丝材——圆形(1毫米)、椭圆形(1×1.5毫米)和半椭圆形(1×1.5毫米)——以及对比的不锈钢多股保持器(G和H以及Respond)。使用Transbond™ LR光固化粘合剂将保持器粘结到牙齿上。模型在蒸馏水中储存24小时,模拟口腔内湿润条件。然后评估脱粘力和失败模式。对粘结保持器的牙间隙区域施加垂直脱粘力。在立体显微镜(×10放大倍数)下检查保持器脱粘后的失败模式。

结果

半椭圆形3D打印保持器产生的脱粘力最高,其次是椭圆形3D打印保持器、麻花状G和H保持器、圆形3D打印保持器以及Respond保持器。椭圆形和半椭圆形3D打印保持器的脱粘力无显著差异。由于3D打印树脂与粘合剂之间的强粘附力,3D打印保持器组主要呈现内聚性失败。

结论

椭圆形和半椭圆形3D打印保持器表现出良好的脱粘力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a1/12036752/2f392f9dadfe/JOS-14-2-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a1/12036752/7311a934f2cb/JOS-14-2-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a1/12036752/320ce4a918cd/JOS-14-2-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a1/12036752/f112328ad032/JOS-14-2-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a1/12036752/96d823604196/JOS-14-2-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a1/12036752/2f392f9dadfe/JOS-14-2-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a1/12036752/7311a934f2cb/JOS-14-2-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a1/12036752/320ce4a918cd/JOS-14-2-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a1/12036752/f112328ad032/JOS-14-2-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a1/12036752/96d823604196/JOS-14-2-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a1/12036752/2f392f9dadfe/JOS-14-2-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Debonding forces and failure modes of customized three-dimensional printed nano-ceramic hybrid resin fixed lingual retainers.定制三维打印纳米陶瓷复合树脂固定舌侧保持器的脱粘力及失效模式
J Orthod Sci. 2025 Mar 25;14:2. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_75_24. eCollection 2025.
2
A Novel 3-Dimensional Printed Nanoceramic Hybrid Resin Fixed Lingual Retainer: Characterization and Mechanical Tests.一种新型三维打印纳米陶瓷复合树脂固定舌侧保持器:表征与力学测试。
Int J Dent. 2024 Oct 15;2024:3540846. doi: 10.1155/2024/3540846. eCollection 2024.
3
Fatigue resistance, debonding force, and failure type of fiber-reinforced composite, polyethylene ribbon-reinforced, and braided stainless steel wire lingual retainers in vitro.纤维增强复合材料、聚乙烯带增强和编织不锈钢丝舌侧固位体在体外的抗疲劳性、脱粘力及失效类型
Korean J Orthod. 2013 Aug;43(4):186-92. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2013.43.4.186. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
4
A comparative study of CAD/CAM fabricated polyether ether ketone and fiber-glass reinforcement composites versus metal lingual retainers under vertical load (an in vitro study).CAD/CAM 制作的聚醚醚酮和玻璃纤维增强复合材料与金属舌侧保持器在垂直载荷下的对比研究(一项体外研究)。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Aug 21;23(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03268-5.
5
Antibacterial activity and debonding force of different lingual retainers bonded with conventional composite and nanoparticle containing composite: An in vitro study.不同舌侧保持器与传统复合树脂和含纳米颗粒复合树脂黏接的抗菌活性和抗剪切强度:一项体外研究。
J World Fed Orthod. 2020 Jun;9(2):80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
6
Tensile test and interface retention forces between wires and composites in lingual fixed retainers.舌侧固定保持器中金属丝与复合材料之间的拉伸试验及界面保持力
Int Orthod. 2015 Jun;13(2):210-220. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 May 21.
7
Gingival health and relapse tendency: a prospective study of two types of lower fixed retainers.牙龈健康与复发倾向:两种类型下颌固定保持器的前瞻性研究
Aust Orthod J. 2009 Nov;25(2):142-6.
8
Comparative evaluation of the performance of orthodontic retainers using different surface protocols: an in vitro study.使用不同表面处理方案的正畸保持器性能的比较评估:一项体外研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Feb 13;40(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04348-4.
9
Bond failure rates for V-loop vs straight wire lingual retainers.V形圈与直丝舌侧保持器的粘结失败率。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Apr;135(4):502-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.04.037.
10
The efficacy of polyether-ether-ketone wire as a retainer following orthodontic treatment.聚醚醚酮丝作为正畸治疗后保持器的疗效。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Jun;7(3):302-312. doi: 10.1002/cre2.377. Epub 2020 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Stability, survival, patient satisfaction, and cost-minimization of CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 2-year follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled trial.CAD/CAM 与传统多股弓丝固定保持器在正畸患者中的稳定性、存活率、患者满意度和成本最小化:一项为期 2 年的双中心随机对照试验的随访。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Apr 1;46(2). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae006.
2
Relapse and failure rates between CAD/CAM and conventional fixed retainers: a 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial.计算机辅助设计与制造(CAD/CAM)固定保持器和传统固定保持器的复发率及失败率:一项随机对照临床试验的2年随访
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Jan 1;46(1). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjad079.
3
Stability and failure rate during 3 years of fixed retention: A follow-up of an randomized clinical trial on adolescents with four different lingual retainers.
3 年固定保持期的稳定性和失败率:一项针对青少年四种不同舌侧保持器的随机临床试验的随访。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024 Apr;27(2):251-258. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12714. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
4
A comparison of CAD/CAM-based fixed retainers versus conventional fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.CAD/CAM 基托保持器与传统固定保持器在正畸患者中的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2023 Sep 18;45(5):545-557. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjad033.
5
Comparison of six different CAD/CAM retainers vs. the stainless steel twistflex retainer: an in vitro investigation of survival rate and stability.六种不同的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)固位体与不锈钢丝圈式固位体的比较:一项关于生存率和稳定性的体外研究
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Mar;86(2):119-128. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00486-y. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
6
Performance of novel enamel-conditioning calcium-phosphate pastes for orthodontic bonding: An study.新型正畸粘结用牙釉质处理磷酸钙糊剂的性能:一项研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2023 Feb 1;15(2):e102-e109. doi: 10.4317/jced.60028. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
Development of a remineralizing calcium phosphate nanoparticle-containing self-etching system for orthodontic bonding.开发一种含再矿化磷酸钙纳米颗粒的自酸蚀系统,用于正畸粘接。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Apr;27(4):1483-1497. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04767-5. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
8
CAD/CAM nitinol bonded retainer versus a chairside rectangular-chain bonded retainer: A multicentre randomised controlled trial.CAD/CAM 镍钛诺结合保持器与椅旁矩形链结合保持器的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验。
J Orthod. 2023 Mar;50(1):55-68. doi: 10.1177/14653125221118935. Epub 2022 Sep 4.
9
Stability, survival, and patient satisfaction with CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 6-month follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled clinical trial.CAD/CAM 与传统多股结扎丝固定保持器在正畸患者中的稳定性、存活率和患者满意度:一项为期 6 个月的双中心随机对照临床试验的随访。
Eur J Orthod. 2023 Feb 10;45(1):58-67. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac042.
10
Bond Strength and Deflection of Four Types of Bonded Lingual Retainers.四种粘结式舌侧保持器的粘结强度和挠曲度
Int J Dent. 2022 Feb 24;2022:1707520. doi: 10.1155/2022/1707520. eCollection 2022.