• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚醚醚酮(PEEK)与超弹性同轴粘结保持器的对比:一项随机临床试验。第 1 部分。稳定性、保持器失败和患者满意度。

Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) versus dead-soft coaxial bonded retainers: a randomized clinical trial. Part 1. Stability, retainer failure, and participant satisfaction.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Bab Al Muadham, Baghdad, Iraq.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2024 Oct 1;46(5). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae044.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjae044
PMID:39206494
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) was introduced in dentistry as an alternative to metal alloys.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of PEEK-fixed retainers in preserving the stability of mandibular anterior and participant satisfaction as compared to the Dead-soft coaxial fixed retainer (DSC).

TRIAL DESIGN

A single-centre, two-arm parallel groups randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

The patients treated with pre-adjusted orthodontic appliances who have a Little's Irregularity Index (LII) ≤ 0.5 mm have been enrolled in the trial. PEEK retainers were prepared to round 0.8 mm wire by computer-aided design and manufacturing, and the DSC wire was carefully adapted to the lingual surface of the lower anterior teeth. The primary outcome was the stability of lower anterior teeth as assessed by LII, while the secondary outcomes were changes in occlusal parameters, retainer failure, and patient satisfaction. The data were collected at the debonding stage (T0), 1 month (T1), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T6) after starting the trial, except for patient's satisfaction, which was recorded using an electronic form at T1 and T6.

BLINDING

Single blinding of participants.

RESULTS

A total of 46 participants with an age range of 12-28 years old were randomly allocated to the two groups (n = 23 in each). Only one participant dropped out; therefore, 45 participants were analysed. The DSC group showed a significant increase in LII at T3. Both retainer groups had comparable occlusal measurements, failure frequency, and survival time, with no significant difference. The patients in the DSC group reported a statistically significant perception of change in the position of their teeth compared to those in the PEEK group.

HARMS

No harmful effects have been reported.

LIMITATIONS

Limited follow-up duration and the inability to blind the operator due to the nature of the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

After 6-month retention, the PEEK retainer was equally effective to DSC retainers in maintaining the teeth alignment, with no significant differences regarding the failure frequency, survival rate, and general patient satisfaction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://register.clinicaltrials.gov. (NCT05557136).

摘要

背景

聚醚醚酮(PEEK)作为金属合金的替代品被引入牙科。

目的

评估 PEEK 固位体在保持下颌前牙稳定性和患者满意度方面的效果,与死软同轴固位体(DSC)相比。

试验设计

单中心、双臂平行组随机临床试验。

方法

本试验纳入了接受预调整正畸矫治器治疗且 Little 不调指数(LII)≤0.5mm 的患者。通过计算机辅助设计和制造,制备 PEEK 保持器以适应 0.8mm 圆丝,而 DSC 丝则仔细适应下颌前牙的舌面。主要结局是通过 LII 评估下颌前牙的稳定性,次要结局是咬合参数的变化、保持器失败和患者满意度。数据在脱粘阶段(T0)、1 个月(T1)、3 个月(T3)和 6 个月(T6)收集,除了患者满意度,这是在 T1 和 T6 使用电子表格记录的。

盲法

对参与者进行单盲。

结果

共纳入 46 名年龄在 12-28 岁之间的患者,随机分为两组(每组 23 名)。仅有 1 名患者退出,因此,45 名患者纳入分析。DSC 组在 T3 时 LII 显著增加。两组保持器的咬合测量、失败频率和生存时间相似,无显著差异。DSC 组的患者报告其牙齿位置感知发生变化,与 PEEK 组相比有统计学意义。

危害

无有害影响报告。

局限性

随访时间有限,由于干预措施的性质,无法对操作者进行盲法。

结论

6 个月保持后,PEEK 保持器与 DSC 保持器在保持牙齿排列方面同样有效,失败频率、生存率和一般患者满意度无显著差异。

试验注册

https://register.clinicaltrials.gov.(NCT05557136)。

相似文献

1
Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) versus dead-soft coaxial bonded retainers: a randomized clinical trial. Part 1. Stability, retainer failure, and participant satisfaction.聚醚醚酮(PEEK)与超弹性同轴粘结保持器的对比:一项随机临床试验。第 1 部分。稳定性、保持器失败和患者满意度。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Oct 1;46(5). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae044.
2
Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone versus dead-soft coaxial bonded retainers: a randomized clinical trial. Part 2: periodontal health and microbial biofilm assessment.聚醚醚酮与超软同轴粘结保持器的对比:一项随机临床试验。第 2 部分:牙周健康和微生物生物膜评估。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Oct 1;46(5). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae048.
3
Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces.正畸治疗后稳定牙齿位置的保持程序。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 22;5(5):CD002283. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub5.
4
The efficacy of polyether-ether-ketone wire as a retainer following orthodontic treatment.聚醚醚酮丝作为正畸治疗后保持器的疗效。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Jun;7(3):302-312. doi: 10.1002/cre2.377. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
5
Stability, survival, and patient satisfaction with CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 6-month follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled clinical trial.CAD/CAM 与传统多股结扎丝固定保持器在正畸患者中的稳定性、存活率和患者满意度:一项为期 6 个月的双中心随机对照临床试验的随访。
Eur J Orthod. 2023 Feb 10;45(1):58-67. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac042.
6
Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces.使用正畸矫治器治疗后稳定牙齿位置的保持程序。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 29;2016(1):CD002283. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub4.
7
Which orthodontic retention protocol should I implement? A critical assessment of a randomised controlled trial.我应该采用哪种正畸保持方案?一项随机对照试验的批判性评估。
Evid Based Dent. 2022 Dec;23(4):162-165. doi: 10.1038/s41432-022-0845-7. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
8
Stability, survival, patient satisfaction, and cost-minimization of CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 2-year follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled trial.CAD/CAM 与传统多股弓丝固定保持器在正畸患者中的稳定性、存活率、患者满意度和成本最小化:一项为期 2 年的双中心随机对照试验的随访。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Apr 1;46(2). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae006.
9
Effectiveness of bonded and vacuum-formed retainers: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.粘结式和真空成型保持器的有效性:一项前瞻性随机对照临床试验。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Sep;150(3):406-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.03.020.
10
Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months.粘结式与真空成型保持器:一项随机对照试验。第1部分:12个月后的稳定性、保持器留存率及患者满意度结果
Eur J Orthod. 2018 Jul 27;40(4):387-398. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx058.