Meyer Andrea M, Hu Antoinette, Liu Alexander T, Jang Diane H, Perez Holguin Rolfy A, Delong Colin G, Pauli Eric M, Horne Charlotte M
The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, M.C. H149, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jan;38(1):356-362. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10428-9. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
Retromuscular drains are commonly placed during retromuscular hernia repair (RHR) to decrease postoperative wound complications and help mesh in-growth. Drains are traditionally removed when output is low but the relationship between drain output at the time of removal and postoperative complications has yet to be delineated. This study aimed to investigate outcomes of RHR patients with drain removal at either high or low output volume.
An institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review evaluated adult patients undergoing open RHR with retromuscular drain placement between 2013 and 2022 at a single academic medical center. Patients were stratified into low output drainage (LOD, < 50 mL/day) or high output drainage (HOD, ≥ 50 mL/day) groups based on volume on the day of drain removal.
We identified 336 patients meeting inclusion criteria: 58% LOD (n = 195) and 42% HOD (n = 141). Demographics and risk factors pertaining to hernia complexity were similar between cohorts. Low-drain output at the time of removal was associated with a significantly longer drain duration (6.3 ± 4.5 vs. 4.4 ± 1.6 days, p < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (5.9 ± 3.6 vs. 4.8 ± 2.8 days, p < 0.001). With a 97% 30-day follow-up, incidence of surgical site occurrence (SSO) was not statistically different between groups (29.2% LOD, 26.2% HOD, p = 0.63). Surgical site infection and SSO requiring procedural intervention was also not statistically significant between cohort. At 1-year follow-up, hernia recurrence rates were the same between groups (4.2% LOD, 1.4% HOD, p = 0.25).
Following open ventral hernia repair with retromuscular mesh placement, the rate of postoperative wound complications was not statistically different based on volume of drain output day of removal. These results suggest that removing drains earlier despite higher output is safe and has no effect on short- or long-term hernia outcomes.
肌后引流管通常在肌后疝修补术(RHR)期间放置,以减少术后伤口并发症并促进补片生长。传统上,当引流量低时拔除引流管,但拔除时的引流量与术后并发症之间的关系尚未明确。本研究旨在调查高引流量或低引流量时拔除引流管的RHR患者的结局。
一项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性病历审查评估了2013年至2022年在单一学术医疗中心接受开放性RHR并放置肌后引流管的成年患者。根据拔除引流管当天的引流量,将患者分为低引流量组(LOD,<50 mL/天)或高引流量组(HOD,≥50 mL/天)。
我们确定了336例符合纳入标准的患者:58%为低引流量组(n = 195),42%为高引流量组(n = 141)。两组之间与疝复杂性相关的人口统计学和危险因素相似。拔除时低引流量与引流持续时间显著延长(6.3±4.5天对4.4±1.6天,p < 0.001)和术后住院时间显著延长(5.9±3.6天对4.8±2.8天,p < 0.001)相关。在97%的30天随访中,两组之间手术部位事件(SSO)的发生率无统计学差异(低引流量组为29.2%,高引流量组为26.2%,p = 0.63)。两组之间手术部位感染和需要进行手术干预的SSO也无统计学差异。在1年随访时,两组之间的疝复发率相同(低引流量组为4.2%,高引流量组为1.4%,p = 0.25)。
在开放性腹疝修补术并放置肌后补片后,根据拔除引流管当天的引流量,术后伤口并发症的发生率无统计学差异。这些结果表明,尽管引流量较高,但提前拔除引流管是安全的,并且对疝的短期或长期结局没有影响。