Suppr超能文献

2%外用利多卡因凝胶对神经传导研究中电刺激所致不适的影响——一项前瞻性双盲安慰剂对照研究。

Effect of 2% Topical Lidocaine Gel on Discomfort from Electrical Stimulation During Nerve Conduction Studies- A Prospective Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study.

作者信息

Al-Hayk Kefah, Smadi Mahmoud M, Elsalem Lina M, Yassin Ahmed, Aqaileh Suha, Obiedat Deema H, Al-Hayk Ahmad Kefah, Al Qawasmeh Majdi, Kofahi Raid, El-Salem Khalid

机构信息

Neurology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science and Arts, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.

出版信息

Local Reg Anesth. 2023 Sep 26;16:153-163. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S426076. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Procedure discomfort can limit electrodiagnostic studies. Reducing discomfort can maximize the benefits of these diagnostic tools. This study targeted the discomfort associated with nerve conduction studies (NCS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study comparing the effect of topical lidocaine gel (2%) versus analgesic-free lubricant gel (K-Y gel) on pain perception during NCS. Sequential patients (n=130) referred for routine NCS participated in the study. We applied 1 mL of lidocaine gel to one palm, and 1 mL of K-Y gel to the other as a control. After 20-45 min of application, graded increments of electrical stimulation intensity were delivered to record the median and ulnar mixed palmar nerve responses. Patients were then asked to score the degree of pain felt from electrical stimulation over each palm using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale (WBFPS) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), independent of baseline pain.

RESULTS

Mean WBFPS and NRS scores for lidocaine-treated palms were significantly lower than those for controls using parametric paired -test (3.79 vs 4.37 and 3.35 vs 3.78 respectively, all p-values<0.05). Subgroup analysis showed a significant decrease in mean scores in females, patients aged ≤50 years, patients without a history of previous NCS, and patients without comorbidities (all p-values<0.05). Median scores using nonparametric Wilcoxon ranked test also showed statistically significant differences (all p-values<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that topical lidocaine 2% gel reduces discomfort associated with NCS. However, despite the statistical significance, clear clinical significance may be lacking. Clinical implementation may be considered for the subgroups that showed the greatest benefit. Further studies that incorporate more efficient drug delivery methods may yield better results.

摘要

目的

检查过程中的不适可能会限制电诊断研究。减轻不适可以使这些诊断工具的益处最大化。本研究针对与神经传导研究(NCS)相关相关相关的不适。

患者与方法

这是一项前瞻性随机双盲安慰剂对照研究,比较局部用利多卡因凝胶(2%)与无镇痛作用的润滑凝胶(K-Y凝胶)对NCS期间疼痛感知的影响。连续入选的130例因常规NCS前来就诊的患者参与了本研究。我们将1 mL利多卡因凝胶涂于一只手掌,另一只手掌涂1 mL K-Y凝胶作为对照。涂抹20 - 45分钟后,逐渐增加电刺激强度以记录正中神经和尺神经混合掌神经反应。然后要求患者使用面部表情疼痛量表(WBFPS)和数字评定量表(NRS)对每只手掌电刺激引起的疼痛程度进行评分,评分与基线疼痛无关。

结果

使用参数配对检验,利多卡因治疗组手掌的平均WBFPS和NRS评分显著低于对照组(分别为3.79对4.37和3.35对3.78,所有p值<0.05)。亚组分析显示,女性、年龄≤50岁的患者、既往无NCS病史的患者以及无合并症的患者,其平均评分显著降低(所有p值<0.05)。使用非参数Wilcoxon秩和检验的中位数评分也显示出统计学显著差异(所有p值<0.05)。

结论

结果表明,2%的局部用利多卡因凝胶可减轻与NCS相关的不适。然而,尽管具有统计学意义,但可能缺乏明确的临床意义。对于显示出最大益处的亚组,可考虑临床应用。纳入更有效给药方法的进一步研究可能会产生更好的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验