Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Krefting Research Centre, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Allergy. 2024 Feb;79(2):302-323. doi: 10.1111/all.15905. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
In 2014, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) published the first systematic review that summarized the prevalence of food allergy (FA) and food sensitization in Europe for studies published 2000-2012. However, only summary estimates for tree nut allergy (TNA) were feasible in that work. In the current update of that systematic review, we summarized the prevalence of tree nut allergy/sensitization to individual tree nuts. Six databases were searched for relevant papers published 2012-2021 and 17 eligible studies were added to the 15 studies already identified between 2000 and 2012, giving a total of 32 studies. Of the investigated tree nuts, meta-analysis was possible for hazelnut, walnut, almond, and in few cases, for cashew, and Brazil nut. The lifetime self-reported prevalence was 0.8% (95% CI 0.5-1.1) for hazelnut and 0.4% (0.2-0.9) for walnut. The point self-reported prevalence was 4.0% (2.9-5.2) for hazelnut, 3.4% (2.0-4.9) for Brazil nut, 2.0% (1.1-2.9) for almond, and 1.8% (1.1-2.5) for walnut. Point prevalence of food challenge-confirmed TNA was 0.04% (0.0-0.1) for hazelnut and 0.02% (0.01-0.1) for walnut. Due to paucity of data, we could not identify any meaningful and consistent differences across age groups and European regions.
2014 年,欧洲过敏与临床免疫学会(EAACI)发表了第一项系统综述,总结了 2000 年至 2012 年发表的欧洲食物过敏(FA)和食物致敏的流行情况。然而,该研究仅对树坚果过敏(TNA)进行了汇总估计。在本次系统综述的更新中,我们总结了对个体树坚果的树坚果过敏/致敏的流行情况。检索了六个数据库,以查找 2012 年至 2021 年发表的相关论文,并将 2000 年至 2012 年期间已经确定的 15 项研究中增加了 17 项符合条件的研究,共 32 项研究。在所研究的树坚果中,榛子、核桃、杏仁进行了荟萃分析,在少数情况下,腰果和巴西坚果也进行了荟萃分析。榛子终生自我报告的流行率为 0.8%(95%CI 0.5-1.1),核桃为 0.4%(0.2-0.9)。榛子的点自我报告流行率为 4.0%(2.9-5.2),巴西坚果为 3.4%(2.0-4.9),杏仁为 2.0%(1.1-2.9),核桃为 1.8%(1.1-2.5)。榛子和核桃食物过敏确认性 TNA 的点流行率分别为 0.04%(0.0-0.1)和 0.02%(0.01-0.1)。由于数据匮乏,我们无法确定各年龄段和欧洲地区之间有任何有意义且一致的差异。