• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《父母糖尿病困扰量表-希腊语版(PDDS-Gr)的维度和心理测量特性》。

Dimensionality and psychometric properties of the Parent Diabetes Distress Scale-Greek (PDDS-Gr).

机构信息

Psychiatric Clinic, General Hospital of Chania, Chania, Crete.

Diabetes Center, 1st Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, 'AHEPA' University General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Macedonia.

出版信息

Psychiatriki. 2024 Oct 8;35(3):221-230. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2023.020. Epub 2023 Sep 29.

DOI:10.22365/jpsych.2023.020
PMID:37793034
Abstract

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic disease characterised by insulin deficiency due to autoimmune destruction of beta-pancreatic cells. T1D, formerly known as juvenile diabetes, is the most common form of diabetes in children and adolescents. On diagnosis, parents of children with TID experience considerable stress, because they need to care for a child in a challenging and life-threatening situation that requires adherence to an intensive medical regimen, constant monitoring of, and coping with their child's condition. T1D is a complex condition that affects both children and their parents in many aspects of their daily lives. This study presents the psychometric properties of the Greek translation of the Parent Diabetes Distress Scale (PDDS), which assesses diabetes distress in parents of children with T1D. A sample of 95 parents, mainly mothers (88.4%), with a mean age of their children 12.2 years (± 3.6) and a diabetes duration of 4.7 years (± 3.4), completed the Greek translation of the PDDS. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a five-factor model: 'Parent/child relationship distress', 'Personal distress', 'Child diabetes management distress', 'Future distress', and 'Healthcare team distress'. Confirmation Factor Analysis (CFA) confirmed the construct validity of the scale. The internal consistency indices (Cronbach alpha) for the subscales ranged from 0.69 to 0.89, while the unidimensional structure had an alpha of 0.90. Furthermore, convergent validity was shown with moderate positive correlations between the PDDS-Gr and the subscales of the DASS-21 (depression, anxiety, and stress), the child's age (in years), and the HbA1c value. Finally, parents of children with inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7%) presented higher scores on both the unidimensional structure and the subscales 'Parent/child relationship distress' and 'Healthcare team distress' of the PDDS-Gr. The PDDS-Gr is a valid and reliable tool for assessing diabetes distress in parents of children with T1D and can be used in both clinical and research settings.

摘要

1 型糖尿病(T1D)是一种慢性疾病,其特征是由于自身免疫破坏胰岛β细胞而导致胰岛素缺乏。T1D 以前被称为青少年糖尿病,是儿童和青少年中最常见的糖尿病类型。在确诊时,T1D 患儿的父母会经历相当大的压力,因为他们需要照顾一个处于具有挑战性和威胁生命的情况下的孩子,这需要他们坚持严格的医疗方案,不断监测并应对孩子的病情。T1D 是一种复杂的疾病,会影响到儿童及其父母日常生活的许多方面。本研究介绍了评估 T1D 患儿父母糖尿病困扰的父母糖尿病困扰量表(PDDS)希腊语翻译版的心理测量学特性。一个由 95 名父母组成的样本,主要是母亲(88.4%),其子女的平均年龄为 12.2 岁(±3.6),糖尿病病程为 4.7 年(±3.4),完成了 PDDS 的希腊语翻译版。探索性因素分析(EFA)显示了一个五因素模型:“父母/孩子关系困扰”、“个人困扰”、“孩子糖尿病管理困扰”、“未来困扰”和“医疗团队困扰”。验证性因素分析(CFA)证实了该量表的结构效度。分量表的内部一致性指数(Cronbach alpha)范围为 0.69 至 0.89,而单一维度结构的 alpha 值为 0.90。此外,PDDS-Gr 与 DASS-21 的子量表(抑郁、焦虑和压力)、孩子的年龄(岁)和 HbA1c 值之间呈中度正相关,表明具有收敛效度。最后,血糖控制不理想(HbA1c≥7%)的患儿父母在 PDDS-Gr 的单一维度结构和“父母/孩子关系困扰”和“医疗团队困扰”分量表上的得分都更高。PDDS-Gr 是一种评估 T1D 患儿父母糖尿病困扰的有效且可靠的工具,可用于临床和研究环境。

相似文献

1
Dimensionality and psychometric properties of the Parent Diabetes Distress Scale-Greek (PDDS-Gr).《父母糖尿病困扰量表-希腊语版(PDDS-Gr)的维度和心理测量特性》。
Psychiatriki. 2024 Oct 8;35(3):221-230. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2023.020. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
2
Dimensionality and psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Τype 1 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS-1-Gr).《1 型糖尿病耻辱感评估量表(DSAS-1-Gr)希腊语版的维度和心理测量特性》。
Psychiatriki. 2023 Dec 29;34(4):279-288. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.097. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
3
Internal structure and psychometric properties of Diabetes Distress Scale for Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病患者糖尿病痛苦量表的内部结构及心理测量学特性
Psychiatriki. 2020 Oct-Dec;31(4):302-309. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2020.314.302.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Parent and Child Problem Areas in Diabetes Measures.父母和儿童糖尿病问题评估量表的心理测量学特性。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2019 Jul 1;44(6):703-713. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsz018.
5
Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Parent Diabetes Distress Scale.土耳其语父母糖尿病困扰量表的效度和信度的心理测量特性。
J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2023 Aug 23;15(3):293-301. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2023.2023-3-20. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
6
Psychometric properties of the German versions of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale for Children (PAID-C) with Type 1 Diabetes and Their Parents (P-PAID-C).《1 型糖尿病儿童及其父母的糖尿病问题领域量表(PAID-C)德语文本的心理测量学特性》。
Psychol Assess. 2024 Sep;36(9):e38-e50. doi: 10.1037/pas0001338.
7
Understanding the Areas and Correlates of Diabetes-Related Distress in Parents of Teens With Type 1 Diabetes.了解1型糖尿病青少年父母中与糖尿病相关困扰的领域及相关因素。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2016 Aug;41(7):750-8. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsw002. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
8
Dimensionality and psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Diabetes Impact and Device Satisfaction (DIDS) scale.希腊版糖尿病影响与设备满意度(DIDS)量表的维度及心理测量特性
Psychiatriki. 2024 Dec 27;35(4):314-323. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2024.017. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
9
Psychometric properties of the German teen and parent versions of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID).青少年和父母版糖尿病问题评估量表(PAID)的德国版本的心理计量特性。
Psychol Assess. 2023 Jul;35(7):e31-e42. doi: 10.1037/pas0001243. Epub 2023 May 25.
10
Assessing fear of hypoglycemia in a population-based study among parents of children with type 1 diabetes - psychometric properties of the hypoglycemia fear survey - parent version.在一项针对1型糖尿病患儿家长的基于人群的研究中评估低血糖恐惧——低血糖恐惧调查问卷家长版的心理测量学特性。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2015 Jan 19;15:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-15-2.