• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检测临床机器学习工具性能随时间的变化。

Detecting changes in the performance of a clinical machine learning tool over time.

机构信息

Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Division of Acute Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Division of Acute Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

EBioMedicine. 2023 Nov;97:104823. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104823. Epub 2023 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104823
PMID:37793210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10550508/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Excessive use of blood cultures (BCs) in Emergency Departments (EDs) results in low yields and high contamination rates, associated with increased antibiotic use and unnecessary diagnostics. Our team previously developed and validated a machine learning model to predict BC outcomes and enhance diagnostic stewardship. While the model showed promising initial results, concerns over performance drift due to evolving patient demographics, clinical practices, and outcome rates warrant continual monitoring and evaluation of such models.

METHODS

A real-time evaluation of the model's performance was conducted between October 2021 and September 2022. The model was integrated into Amsterdam UMC's Electronic Health Record system, predicting BC outcomes for all adult patients with BC draws in real time. The model's performance was assessed monthly using metrics including the Area Under the Curve (AUC), Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC), and Brier scores. Statistical Process Control (SPC) charts were used to monitor variation over time.

FINDINGS

Across 3.035 unique adult patient visits, the model achieved an average AUC of 0.78, AUPRC of 0.41, and a Brier score of 0.10 for predicting the outcome of BCs drawn in the ED. While specific population characteristics changed over time, no statistical points outside the statistical control range were detected in the AUC, AUPRC, and Brier scores, indicating stable model performance. The average BC positivity rate during the study period was 13.4%.

INTERPRETATION

Despite significant changes in clinical practice, our BC stewardship tool exhibited stable performance, suggesting its robustness to changing environments. Using SPC charts for various metrics enables simple and effective monitoring of potential performance drift. The assessment of the variation of outcome rates and population changes may guide the specific interventions, such as intercept correction or recalibration, that may be needed to maintain a stable model performance over time. This study suggested no need to recalibrate or correct our BC stewardship tool.

FUNDING

No funding to disclose.

摘要

背景

急诊科(ED)过度使用血培养(BC)会导致低阳性率和高污染率,这与抗生素的过度使用和不必要的诊断有关。我们的团队之前开发并验证了一种机器学习模型,以预测 BC 的结果并加强诊断管理。虽然该模型显示出了有希望的初步结果,但由于患者人口统计学、临床实践和结果率的不断变化,对模型性能漂移的担忧需要对这些模型进行持续监测和评估。

方法

我们在 2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 9 月期间对该模型的性能进行了实时评估。该模型被集成到阿姆斯特丹 UMC 的电子健康记录系统中,实时预测所有接受 BC 采血的成年患者的 BC 结果。该模型的性能每月使用包括曲线下面积(AUC)、精度-召回率曲线下面积(AUPRC)和 Brier 评分在内的指标进行评估。统计过程控制(SPC)图表用于监测随时间的变化。

结果

在 3035 名独特的成年患者就诊中,该模型在预测 ED 中采集的 BC 结果方面的 AUC 平均为 0.78,AUPRC 为 0.41,Brier 评分 0.10。尽管特定的人口特征随时间发生了变化,但 AUC、AUPRC 和 Brier 评分中未检测到统计控制范围之外的统计点,表明模型性能稳定。研究期间的平均 BC 阳性率为 13.4%。

解释

尽管临床实践发生了重大变化,但我们的 BC 管理工具表现出稳定的性能,表明其对不断变化的环境具有稳健性。使用 SPC 图表对各种指标进行评估,可以实现对潜在性能漂移的简单有效的监测。对结果率和人口变化的变化进行评估可能会指导需要进行的具体干预措施,例如截距校正或重新校准,以保持模型性能随时间的稳定。本研究表明无需重新校准或修正我们的 BC 管理工具。

资助

无资金披露。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c32c/10550508/4a96b73df66b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c32c/10550508/d3717b958818/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c32c/10550508/0f591c073d4f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c32c/10550508/4a96b73df66b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c32c/10550508/d3717b958818/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c32c/10550508/0f591c073d4f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c32c/10550508/4a96b73df66b/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Detecting changes in the performance of a clinical machine learning tool over time.检测临床机器学习工具性能随时间的变化。
EBioMedicine. 2023 Nov;97:104823. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104823. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
2
Diagnostic stewardship for blood cultures in the emergency department: A multicenter validation and prospective evaluation of a machine learning prediction tool.急诊科血培养的诊断管理:机器学习预测工具的多中心验证和前瞻性评估。
EBioMedicine. 2022 Aug;82:104176. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104176. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
3
How Does the Skeletal Oncology Research Group Algorithm's Prediction of 5-year Survival in Patients with Chondrosarcoma Perform on International Validation?骨肿瘤研究组算法对软骨肉瘤患者 5 年生存率的预测在国际验证中的表现如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2300-2308. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001305.
4
Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study.使用机器学习预测急诊科血培养结果:一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 4;12(1):e053332. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053332.
5
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
6
Establishment of noninvasive diabetes risk prediction model based on tongue features and machine learning techniques.基于舌象特征和机器学习技术的无创糖尿病风险预测模型的建立。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 May;149:104429. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104429. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
7
Heart rate variability based machine learning models for risk prediction of suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department.基于心率变异性的机器学习模型用于急诊科疑似脓毒症患者的风险预测
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(6):e14197. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014197.
8
Reducing blood culture contamination rates in the emergency department.降低急诊科血培养污染率。
J Emerg Nurs. 2013 Jan;39(1):e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2012.10.009.
9
Predicting exclusive breastfeeding in maternity wards using machine learning techniques.运用机器学习技术预测产科病房中的纯母乳喂养情况。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Jun;221:106837. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106837. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
10
Predicting in-hospital mortality in adult non-traumatic emergency department patients: a retrospective comparison of the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and machine learning approach.预测成年非创伤性急诊科患者的院内死亡率:改良早期预警评分(MEWS)与机器学习方法的回顾性比较
PeerJ. 2021 Aug 24;9:e11988. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11988. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance Drift in a Nationally Deployed Population Health Risk Algorithm in the US Veterans Health Administration.美国退伍军人健康管理局全国部署的人口健康风险算法中的性能漂移
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Aug 1;6(8):e252717. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2717.
2
Leveraging Natural Language Processing for Psychiatric Phenotyping from Spanish Electronic Health Records: Enabling the Investigation of Transdiagnostic Symptom Profiles at Scale.利用自然语言处理技术从西班牙电子健康记录中进行精神疾病表型分析:实现大规模跨诊断症状特征的研究。
Complex Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 7;11(1):99-112. doi: 10.1159/000546480. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Letter to the Editor regarding "blood culture bottle shortage mitigation efforts: analysis of impact on ordering and patient impact" by Doern et al.
致编辑的信:关于Doern等人所著的“缓解血培养瓶短缺的努力:对订购的影响及对患者的影响分析”
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 11;5(1):e153. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.10053. eCollection 2025.
4
Artificial intelligence in antimicrobial stewardship: a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive performance and diagnostic accuracy.抗菌药物管理中的人工智能:预测性能和诊断准确性的系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 Mar;44(3):463-513. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-05027-y. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
5
Monitoring performance of clinical artificial intelligence in health care: a scoping review.医疗保健中临床人工智能性能监测:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Dec 1;22(12):2423-2446. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00042.
6
Appropriate use of blood cultures in the emergency department through machine learning (ABC): study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.通过机器学习在急诊科中合理使用血培养(ABC):一项随机对照非劣效试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 31;14(5):e084053. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084053.