• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国处方安全评估(PSA):国家在线处方评估的开发、实施和结果。

UK Prescribing Safety Assessment (PSA): The development, implementation and outcomes of a national online prescribing assessment.

机构信息

William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

St George's, University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Feb;90(2):493-503. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15919. Epub 2023 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1111/bcp.15919
PMID:37793701
Abstract

AIMS

The United Kingdom (UK) Prescribing Safety Assessment (PSA) is a 2-h online assessment of basic competence to prescribe and supervise the use of medicines. It has been undertaken by students and doctors in UK medical and foundation schools for the past decade. This study describes the academic characteristics and performance of the assessment; longitudinal performance of candidates and schools; stakeholder feedback; and surrogate markers of prescribing safety in UK healthcare practice.

METHODS

We reviewed the performance data generated by over 70 000 medical students and 3700 foundation doctors who have participated in the PSA since its inception in 2013. These data were supplemented by Likert scale and free text feedback from candidates and a variety of stakeholder groups. Further data on medication incidents, collected by national reporting systems and the regulatory body, are reported, with permission.

RESULTS

We demonstrate the feasibility, high quality and reliability of an online prescribing assessment, uniquely providing a measure of prescribing competence against a national standard. Over 90% of candidates pass the PSA on their first attempt, while a minority are identified for further training and assessment. The pass rate shows some variation between different institutions and between undergraduate and foundation cohorts. Most responders to a national survey agreed that the PSA is a useful instrument for assessing prescribing competence, and an independent review has recommended adding the PSA to the Medical Licensing Assessment. Surrogate markers suggest there has been improvement in prescribing safety in practice, temporally associated with the introduction of the PSA but other factors could be influential too.

CONCLUSIONS

The PSA is a practical and cost-effective way of delivering a reliable national assessment of prescribing competence that has educational impact and is supported by the majority of stakeholders. There is a need to develop national systems to identify and report prescribing errors and the harm they cause, enabling the impact of educational interventions to be measured.

摘要

目的

英国处方安全评估(PSA)是一项时长 2 小时的在线基本处方能力评估,旨在评估和监督药物的使用。过去十年,英国医学和基础医学院的学生和医生一直在进行这项评估。本研究描述了评估的学术特征和表现;候选人及学校的纵向表现;利益相关者的反馈;以及英国医疗实践中处方安全的替代指标。

方法

我们回顾了自 2013 年 PSA 启动以来,超过 70000 名医学生和 3700 名基础医生参与该评估所产生的表现数据。这些数据补充了候选人以及各种利益相关者群体的李克特量表和自由文本反馈。经许可,我们还报告了从国家报告系统和监管机构收集的关于药物事件的进一步数据。

结果

我们证明了在线处方评估的可行性、高质量和可靠性,这在独特的方面提供了一种衡量处方能力的方法,该方法符合国家标准。超过 90%的候选人首次尝试就通过了 PSA,而少数人则需要进一步培训和评估。通过率在不同机构和本科和基础课程之间存在一些差异。对全国性调查的大多数回应者都认为 PSA 是评估处方能力的有用工具,独立审查建议将 PSA 添加到医学许可评估中。替代指标表明,实践中的处方安全性有所提高,这与 PSA 的引入时间相关,但其他因素也可能有影响。

结论

PSA 是一种实用且具有成本效益的方法,可以可靠地评估全国范围内的处方能力,具有教育影响力,并得到大多数利益相关者的支持。需要开发国家系统来识别和报告处方错误及其造成的危害,以便衡量教育干预的效果。

相似文献

1
UK Prescribing Safety Assessment (PSA): The development, implementation and outcomes of a national online prescribing assessment.英国处方安全评估(PSA):国家在线处方评估的开发、实施和结果。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Feb;90(2):493-503. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15919. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
2
Prescribing Safety Assessment 2016: Delivery of a national prescribing assessment to 7343 UK final-year medical students.2016 年处方安全评估:向 7343 名英国医学应届毕业生提供全国性处方评估。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;83(10):2249-2258. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13319. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
3
Piloting the United Kingdom 'Prescribing Safety Assessment' with pharmacist prescribers in Scotland.在苏格兰,与药剂师处方者一起试行英国“处方安全评估”。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Jan;14(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
4
The role of undergraduate teaching, learning and a national prescribing safety assessment in preparation for practical prescribing: UK medical students' perspective.本科教学、学习和国家处方安全评估在实践处方准备中的作用:英国医学生的观点。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;85(10):2390-2398. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14058. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
5
Exploring the utility of the Prescribing Safety Assessment in pharmacy education in England: experiences of pre-registration trainees and undergraduate (MPharm) pharmacy students.探索英国药学教育中处方安全评估的效用:预注册实习生和本科(药学硕士)药学专业学生的经历。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2019 Apr;27(2):207-213. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12479. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
6
Candidates registered for reasonable adjustments underperform compared to other candidates in the national undergraduate Prescribing Safety Assessment: Retrospective cohort analysis (2014-2018).在全国本科生处方安全评估中,注册合理调整的考生与其他考生相比表现不佳:回顾性队列分析(2014-2018 年)。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Mar;87(3):946-954. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14446. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
7
Assessing prescribing competence.评估处方能力。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Oct;74(4):632-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04151.x.
8
Evaluation of the Prescribing Skills Assessment implementation, performance and medical student experience in Australia and New Zealand.评估处方技能评估在澳大利亚和新西兰的实施、表现和医学生体验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Oct;89(10):3105-3115. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15814. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
9
Improving prescribing learning in problem-based learning.基于问题学习中处方学习的改进。
Clin Teach. 2024 Dec;21(6):e13827. doi: 10.1111/tct.13827. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
10
Experiences from the initial 3 years of introducing the British Pharmacological Society and UK Medical Schools Council Prescribing Safety Assessment for Danish junior doctors.丹麦初级医生引入英国药理学会和英国医学院校委员会处方安全评估最初三年的经验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Mar;91(3):781-788. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16280. Epub 2024 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and solutions for the European prescribing exam: a qualitative world café study.欧洲处方考试的障碍与解决方案:一项定性的世界咖啡屋研究
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 26. doi: 10.1007/s00228-025-03886-8.
2
Bridging the gap between clinical pharmacology and rational drug prescribing 2.0: An up-date after 30 years.弥合临床药理学与合理用药之间的差距2.0:30年后的最新进展。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Mar 14;91(8):2138-41. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16051.
3
Pandora's Box.潘多拉的盒子。
BJPsych Int. 2024 Feb;21(1):21-23. doi: 10.1192/bji.2023.38.