• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2016 年处方安全评估:向 7343 名英国医学应届毕业生提供全国性处方评估。

Prescribing Safety Assessment 2016: Delivery of a national prescribing assessment to 7343 UK final-year medical students.

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Medical Education Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH3 2XU, UK.

School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences (CMDS), Medical School Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;83(10):2249-2258. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13319. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1111/bcp.13319
PMID:28449302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5595977/
Abstract

AIMS

Newly graduated doctors write a large proportion of prescriptions in UK hospitals but recent studies have shown that they frequently make prescribing errors. The prescribing safety assessment (PSA) has been developed as an assessment of competence in relation to prescribing and supervising the use of medicines. This report describes the delivery of the PSA to all UK final-year medical students in 2016 (PSA2016).

METHODS

The PSA is a 2-hour online assessment comprising eight sections which cover various aspects of prescribing defined within the outcomes of undergraduate education identified by the UK General Medical Council. Students sat one of four PSA 'papers', which had been standard-set using a modified Angoff process.

RESULTS

A total of 7343 final-year medical students in all 31 UK medical schools sat the PSA. The overall pass rate was 95% with the pass rates for the individual papers ranging from 93 to 97%. The PSA was re-sat by 261 students who had failed and 80% of those candidates passed. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of the four papers ranged from 0.74 to 0.77 (standard error of measurement 4.13-4.24%). There was a statistically significant variation in performance between medical school cohorts (F = 32.6, P < 0.001) and a strongly positive correlation in performance for individual schools between PSA2015 and PSA2016 (r = 0.79, 95% CI 0.61-0.90; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PSA2016 demonstrated the feasibility of delivering a standardized national prescribing assessment online. The vast majority of UK final-year medical students were able to meet a prespecified standard of prescribing competence.

摘要

目的

在英国医院,刚毕业的医生书写了很大一部分处方,但最近的研究表明,他们经常开出处方错误。处方安全评估(PSA)是作为评估与处方相关的能力和监督药物使用的一种评估方法。本报告描述了 2016 年向所有英国医学应届毕业生提供 PSA(PSA2016)的情况。

方法

PSA 是一项 2 小时的在线评估,由八个部分组成,涵盖了英国医学总会确定的本科教育成果中规定的处方的各个方面。学生参加了四个 PSA“试卷”中的一个,这些试卷是使用经过修改的 Angoff 过程进行标准设置的。

结果

共有 31 所英国医学院的 7343 名应届医学毕业生参加了 PSA。总体通过率为 95%,各个试卷的通过率从 93%到 97%不等。261 名未通过的学生重新参加了 PSA,其中 80%的考生通过了。四套试卷的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha)在 0.74 到 0.77 之间(测量标准误差为 4.13-4.24%)。医学院校群体之间的表现存在统计学上的显著差异(F=32.6,P<0.001),个别学校之间 PSA2015 和 PSA2016 的表现呈强正相关(r=0.79,95%置信区间 0.61-0.90;P<0.01)。

结论

PSA2016 证明了在线提供标准化国家处方评估的可行性。绝大多数英国医学应届毕业生能够达到预定的处方能力标准。

相似文献

1
Prescribing Safety Assessment 2016: Delivery of a national prescribing assessment to 7343 UK final-year medical students.2016 年处方安全评估:向 7343 名英国医学应届毕业生提供全国性处方评估。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;83(10):2249-2258. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13319. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
2
Piloting the United Kingdom 'Prescribing Safety Assessment' with pharmacist prescribers in Scotland.在苏格兰,与药剂师处方者一起试行英国“处方安全评估”。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Jan;14(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
3
The role of undergraduate teaching, learning and a national prescribing safety assessment in preparation for practical prescribing: UK medical students' perspective.本科教学、学习和国家处方安全评估在实践处方准备中的作用:英国医学生的观点。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;85(10):2390-2398. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14058. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
4
UK Prescribing Safety Assessment (PSA): The development, implementation and outcomes of a national online prescribing assessment.英国处方安全评估(PSA):国家在线处方评估的开发、实施和结果。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Feb;90(2):493-503. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15919. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
5
Evaluation of the Prescribing Skills Assessment implementation, performance and medical student experience in Australia and New Zealand.评估处方技能评估在澳大利亚和新西兰的实施、表现和医学生体验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Oct;89(10):3105-3115. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15814. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
6
Exploring the utility of the Prescribing Safety Assessment in pharmacy education in England: experiences of pre-registration trainees and undergraduate (MPharm) pharmacy students.探索英国药学教育中处方安全评估的效用:预注册实习生和本科(药学硕士)药学专业学生的经历。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2019 Apr;27(2):207-213. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12479. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
7
Impact of a focussed teaching programme on practical prescribing skills among final year medical students.集中教学方案对医学专业最后一年学生实践处方技能的影响。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jan;71(1):29-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03808.x.
8
Comparing single-best-answer and very-short-answer questions for the assessment of applied medical knowledge in 20 UK medical schools: Cross-sectional study.比较 20 所英国医学院应用医学知识评估中的单项最佳答案题和极简短答案题:横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 26;9(9):e032550. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032550.
9
A prescribing e-tutorial for medical students.面向医学生的处方电子教程。
Clin Teach. 2014 Feb;11(1):33-7. doi: 10.1111/tct.12100.
10
Do final-year medical students have sufficient prescribing competencies? A systematic literature review.应届医学专业毕业生是否具备足够的处方能力?一项系统文献回顾。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Apr;84(4):615-635. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13491. Epub 2018 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Appraising the visibility, relevance and impacts of clinical pharmacology.评估临床药理学的可见性、相关性及影响。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jul;91(7):1884-1898. doi: 10.1002/bcp.70074. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
2
Confidence in Prescribing Practices: Perspectives of Senior Medical Students and Recent Graduates at Qatar University.对处方实践的信心:卡塔尔大学高年级医学生和应届毕业生的观点
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024 Dec 28;15:1325-1337. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S476352. eCollection 2024.
3
Enhancing therapeutic reasoning: key insights and recommendations for education in prescribing.强化治疗推理:处方教育的关键见解和建议。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 26;24(1):1360. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06310-4.
4
Experiences from the initial 3 years of introducing the British Pharmacological Society and UK Medical Schools Council Prescribing Safety Assessment for Danish junior doctors.丹麦初级医生引入英国药理学会和英国医学院校委员会处方安全评估最初三年的经验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Mar;91(3):781-788. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16280. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
5
Bridging the gap between clinical pharmacology and rational drug prescribing 2.0: An up-date after 30 years.弥合临床药理学与合理用药之间的差距2.0:30年后的最新进展。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Mar 14;91(8):2138-41. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16051.
6
Medical student perceptions of their knowledge and skills in pharmacology in their first and final clinical years.医学生在临床第一年和最后一年对其药理学知识与技能的认知。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2019 Mar 8;8:42. doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000042.1. eCollection 2019.
7
The impact of a summative national prescribing assessment and curriculum type on the development of the prescribing competence of junior doctors.国家总结性处方评估和课程类型对初级医生处方能力发展的影响。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Dec;79(12):1613-1621. doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03567-4. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
8
Do educational interventions improve prescribing skills of medical students compared to no additional learning? A systematic review.教育干预是否能提高医学生的处方技能,与无额外学习相比?系统评价。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2259166. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2259166. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
9
The European Prescribing Exam: assessing whether European medical students can prescribe rationally and safely.欧洲处方考试:评估欧洲医学生是否能够合理且安全地开处方。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jun;78(6):1049-1051. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03301-6. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
10
Insights into Delivering Cross-Cultural Medical Education in the UK and Malaysia.关于在英国和马来西亚开展跨文化医学教育的见解。
Med Sci Educ. 2021 Sep 16;31(6):2177-2188. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01382-z. eCollection 2021 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Piloting the United Kingdom 'Prescribing Safety Assessment' with pharmacist prescribers in Scotland.在苏格兰,与药剂师处方者一起试行英国“处方安全评估”。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Jan;14(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
2
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
3
Prescribing safety: ensuring that new graduates are prepared.处方安全:确保新毕业生做好准备。
Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):579-581. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62339-4.
4
PLAB and UK graduates' performance on MRCP(UK) and MRCGP examinations: data linkage study.PLAB 和英国毕业生在 MRCP(UK) 和 MRCGP 考试中的表现:数据链接研究。
BMJ. 2014 Apr 17;348:g2621. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2621.
5
Prevalence and causes of prescribing errors: the PRescribing Outcomes for Trainee Doctors Engaged in Clinical Training (PROTECT) study.处方错误的流行率和原因:参与临床培训的实习医生的处方结果(PROTECT)研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 3;9(1):e79802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079802. eCollection 2014.
6
Foundation doctors' views on whether their medical school prepared them well for work: UK graduates of 2008 and 2009.2008 年和 2009 年英国医学毕业生对医学院校培养其工作能力的看法:基础医生的观点。
Postgrad Med J. 2014 Feb;90(1060):63-8. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131321. Epub 2012 Dec 8.
7
Prescribing and the core curriculum for tomorrow's doctors: BPS curriculum in clinical pharmacology and prescribing for medical students.为明天的医生制定处方和核心课程:医学生临床药理学和处方的 BPS 课程。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Oct;74(4):644-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04186.x.
8
Are medical graduates ready to face the challenges of Foundation training?医学毕业生是否准备好迎接基础培训的挑战?
Postgrad Med J. 2011 Sep;87(1031):590-5. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2010.115659. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
9
Teaching of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics in UK medical schools: current status in 2009.英国医学院临床药理学与治疗学教学:2009 年现状。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Jul;70(1):143-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03665.x.
10
The standard error of measurement is a more appropriate measure of quality for postgraduate medical assessments than is reliability: an analysis of MRCP(UK) examinations.测量标准误差是研究生医学评估中比可靠性更合适的质量衡量标准:对 MRCP(UK)考试的分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2010 Jun 2;10:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-40.