• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项探索国际上对藏毛窦疾病管理的调查。

An international survey exploring the management of pilonidal disease.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

General Surgery Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, St Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2023 Nov;25(11):2177-2186. doi: 10.1111/codi.16760. Epub 2023 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1111/codi.16760
PMID:37794562
Abstract

AIM

Pilonidal disease (PD) is a common debilitating condition frequently seen in surgical practice. Several available treatments carry different benefit/risk balances. The aim of this study was to snapshot the current management of PD across European countries.

METHOD

Members affiliated to the European Society of Coloproctology were invited to join the survey. An invitation was extended to others via social media. The predictive power of respondents' and hospitals' demographics on the change of therapeutic approach was explored.

RESULTS

Respondents (n = 452) were mostly men (77%), aged 26-60 years, practising in both academic and public hospitals and with fair distribution between colorectal (51%) and general (48%) surgeons. A total of 331 (73%) respondents recommended surgery at first presentation of the disease. Up to 80% of them recommended antibiotic therapy and 95% did not use any classification of PD. A primary closure technique was the preferred procedure (29%), followed by open technique (22%), flap creation (7%), sinusectomy (7%) and marsupialization (7%). Approximately 27% of subjects would choose the same surgical technique even after a failure. Almost half (46%) perform surgery as office based. A conservative approach was negatively associated with acutely presenting PD (p < 0.001). Respondents who were not considering tailored surgery based on patient presentation tended to change their approach in the case of a failed procedure.

CONCLUSION

With the caveat of a heterogeneous number of respondents across countries, the results of our snapshot survey may inform the development of future guidelines.

摘要

目的

藏毛窦病(PD)是一种常见的、经常在外科实践中出现的使人虚弱的疾病。现有的几种治疗方法具有不同的获益/风险平衡。本研究的目的是捕捉欧洲各国 PD 的当前治疗方法。

方法

邀请欧洲结直肠外科学会成员参加调查。通过社交媒体向其他人员发出邀请。探索了受访者和医院的人口统计学特征对治疗方法变化的预测能力。

结果

受访者(n=452)主要是 26-60 岁的男性(77%),在学术和公立医院工作,其中直肠结肠外科医生(51%)和普通外科医生(48%)的分布较为均衡。331 名(73%)受访者建议在疾病首次发作时进行手术。多达 80%的人建议使用抗生素治疗,95%的人不使用任何 PD 分类。首选的方法是一期缝合技术(29%),其次是开放式技术(22%)、皮瓣形成术(7%)、窦切除术(7%)和袋形切除术(7%)。约 27%的患者即使手术失败,也会选择相同的手术技术。近一半(46%)的人在办公室进行手术。保守治疗与急性 PD 呈负相关(p<0.001)。不考虑根据患者表现进行个体化手术的受访者,在手术失败的情况下,他们倾向于改变治疗方法。

结论

尽管各国受访者的数量存在差异,但本快照调查的结果可能为未来指南的制定提供信息。

相似文献

1
An international survey exploring the management of pilonidal disease.一项探索国际上对藏毛窦疾病管理的调查。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Nov;25(11):2177-2186. doi: 10.1111/codi.16760. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
2
How to repair the surgical defect after excision of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a dilemma.如何修复骶尾部藏毛窦切除术后的手术缺损:一个两难问题。
J Wound Care. 2014 Dec;23(12):630-3. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2014.23.12.630.
3
Randomized prospective comparison of midline and off-midline closure techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery.藏毛窦手术中中线与非中线闭合技术的随机前瞻性比较。
Surgery. 2016 Mar;159(3):749-54. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.09.024. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
4
Management of Pilonidal Disease: A Review.《藏毛窦疾病的管理:综述》
JAMA Surg. 2023 Aug 1;158(8):875-883. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0373.
5
A comparison of flap reconstruction vs the laying open technique or excision and direct suture for pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis of randomised studies.对比皮瓣重建与敞开引流术或切除直接缝合治疗藏毛窦疾病的效果:一项随机研究的荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2019 Oct;16(5):1119-1135. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13163. Epub 2019 Jun 23.
6
Outcomes of the house advancement flap for pilonidal sinus.藏毛窦的推进皮瓣手术效果
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Sep;87(9):692-694. doi: 10.1111/ans.13077. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
7
Sinusectomy and primary closure versus excision and primary closure in pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective cohort study.鼻窦切除术和一期缝合与切除和一期缝合在藏毛窦疾病中的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jun;35(6):1117-1124. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03575-1. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
8
The effects of skin closure by using mattress sutures or intracutaneous absorbable sutures after the Karydakis flap surgery because of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. A comparative analysis.骶尾部藏毛窦行卡里达基斯皮瓣手术后使用褥式缝合或皮内可吸收缝合进行皮肤闭合的效果。一项对比分析。
Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:474-479.
9
Experience with pilonidal disease in children.儿童肛门部藏毛窦疾病的诊治经验。
J Surg Res. 2011 Sep;170(1):165-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.02.016. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
10
Comparison of different surgical options in the treatment of pilonidal disease: retrospective analysis of 175 patients.藏毛窦疾病不同手术方式的比较:175例患者的回顾性分析
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2007 Feb;23(2):67-70. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70377-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Practice patterns of paediatric surgeons on treating pilonidal sinus disease - a national survey study.小儿外科医生治疗藏毛窦疾病的实践模式——一项全国性调查研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jul 28;40(1):165. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04959-x.
2
Pediatric pilonidal sinus disease: Recurrence rates of different age groups compared to adults.小儿藏毛窦疾病:不同年龄组与成人相比的复发率
Surg Open Sci. 2025 Jan 7;23:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2025.01.001. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Time trends in incidence of pilonidal sinus disease from 1996 to 2021: A Danish population-based cohort study.
1996年至2021年藏毛窦疾病发病率的时间趋势:一项基于丹麦人群的队列研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Nov 3;27(1). doi: 10.1111/codi.17227.