• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗抑郁药治疗慢性背痛患者的疗效和安全性比较:网络荟萃分析。

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Antidepressants for Patients with Chronic Back Pain: A Network Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Algology, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining, China.

出版信息

J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Feb;64(2):205-214. doi: 10.1002/jcph.2365. Epub 2023 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1002/jcph.2365
PMID:37794650
Abstract

Various antidepressants have introduced in clinical practice for pain management, but it is important to understand how to properly use them. We therefore performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare and rank the efficacy and safety of antidepressants for patients with chronic back pain. We identified eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the efficacy and safety of antidepressants for chronic back pain from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov, searching from inception to May 2023. Six categories of antidepressants for the treatment of chronic back pain were included, and the surface under the cumulative ranking probabilities was applied to rank the treatment strategies. Overall, we selected 19 RCTs recruiting 2903 patients for the meta-analysis. Tricyclic antidepressants presented the best relative effects for relief in pain score (surface under the cumulative ranking, 84.4%). The results of pairwise comparison analyses found the use of serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) significantly reduced pain score and low disability score compared with placebo, irrespective of treatment duration. Noradrenaline-dopamine reuptake inhibitors (relative risk [RR], 2.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-6.03; P = .008) and SNRIs (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07-1.27; P < .001) significantly increased the risk of adverse events. SNRIs were associated with an increased risk of withdrawal due to adverse events (RR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.64-3.43; P < .001). This study found that antidepressants are more efficacious than placebos for treating chronic back pain, and tricyclic antidepressants are the most likely medications that lead to pain relief.

摘要

各种抗抑郁药已在临床实践中用于疼痛管理,但了解如何正确使用它们非常重要。因此,我们进行了系统评价和网络荟萃分析,以比较和评估抗抑郁药治疗慢性背痛患者的疗效和安全性。我们从 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 ClinicalTrials.gov 中确定了符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验调查了抗抑郁药治疗慢性背痛的疗效和安全性,检索时间从成立到 2023 年 5 月。纳入了治疗慢性背痛的 6 类抗抑郁药,并应用累积排序概率曲线下面积(surface under the cumulative ranking,SUCRA)来对治疗策略进行排序。总体而言,我们对纳入的 19 项 RCT 进行了荟萃分析,共招募了 2903 名患者。三环类抗抑郁药在缓解疼痛评分方面表现出最佳的相对效果(累积排序概率曲线下面积,84.4%)。成对比较分析的结果发现,与安慰剂相比,使用 5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors,SNRIs)可显著降低疼痛评分和较低的残疾评分,且与治疗持续时间无关。去甲肾上腺素-多巴胺再摄取抑制剂(相对风险[RR],2.80;95%置信区间[CI],1.30-6.03;P=0.008)和 SNRIs(RR,1.17;95% CI,1.07-1.27;P<0.001)显著增加了不良反应的风险。SNRIs 与因不良反应而停药的风险增加相关(RR,2.37;95% CI,1.64-3.43;P<0.001)。本研究发现,与安慰剂相比,抗抑郁药治疗慢性背痛更有效,三环类抗抑郁药是最有可能缓解疼痛的药物。

相似文献

1
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Antidepressants for Patients with Chronic Back Pain: A Network Meta-Analysis.抗抑郁药治疗慢性背痛患者的疗效和安全性比较:网络荟萃分析。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Feb;64(2):205-214. doi: 10.1002/jcph.2365. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
2
Pharmacological treatments in panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人惊恐障碍的药物治疗:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):CD012729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012729.pub3.
3
Antidepressants for low back pain and spine-related leg pain.用于治疗腰痛和脊柱相关性腿痛的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 10;3(3):CD001703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001703.pub4.
4
Vortioxetine for depression in adults.伏硫西汀用于成人抑郁症治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 5;7(7):CD011520. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011520.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
7
New generation antidepressants for depression in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.新一代抗抑郁药治疗儿童和青少年抑郁症:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;5(5):CD013674. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013674.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
10
Antidepressants versus placebo for panic disorder in adults.成人惊恐障碍患者使用抗抑郁药与安慰剂的对照研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 5;4(4):CD010676. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010676.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
State-of-the-Art Personalized Therapy Approaches for Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: Understanding the Mechanisms and Drivers.慢性非特异性下腰痛的前沿个性化治疗方法:理解其机制与驱动因素
Pain Ther. 2025 Apr;14(2):479-496. doi: 10.1007/s40122-025-00706-w. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
2
Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for pain in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗老年人疼痛的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Dec;90(12):3097-3118. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16234. Epub 2024 Sep 12.