Reply to: Rethinking Vasopressor Education: The Need to Avoid Teaching the Bare Minimum.
作者信息
Manson Daniel K, Dzierba Amy L, Seitz Kaitlin M, Brodie Daniel
机构信息
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine and.
Department of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
出版信息
ATS Sch. 2023 Sep 29;4(3):391-392. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0049LE. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reply to: Rethinking Vasopressor Education: The Need to Avoid Teaching the Bare Minimum.回复：重新思考血管加压药的教学：避免只教授最低限度内容的必要性。
ATS Sch. 2023 Sep 29;4(3):391-392. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0049LE. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Rethinking Vasopressor Education: The Need to Avoid Teaching the Bare Minimum.重新思考血管加压药的教学：避免只教授最低限度内容的必要性。
ATS Sch. 2023 Sep 29;4(3):389-390. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0030LE. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Narrative pedagogy: rethinking nursing education.叙事教学法：反思护理教育
J Nurs Educ. 1995 May;34(5):204-10. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19950501-05.
4
[Rethinking the teaching of nursing techniques].
Krankenpfl Soins Infirm. 1997 Dec;90(12):53-7.
5
Evaluation of the IDSA/ATS minor criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia.
Hosp Pract (1995). 2012 Apr;40(2):158-64. doi: 10.3810/hp.2012.04.981.
6
Rethinking the teacher's role?
Spec Educ Forward Trends. 1978 Jun;5(2):8-9.
7
Considerations on a Phronetic Proposal: a Bakhtinian Reply.关于一种实践智慧提议的思考：巴赫金式的回应。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2017 Dec;51(4):570-581. doi: 10.1007/s12124-017-9387-5.
8
In Reply: Encouraging a Bare Minimum While Striving for the Gold Standard: A Response to the Updated WHO-WFSA Guidelines.
Anesth Analg. 2019 Jan;128(1):e13-e14. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003882.
9
In reply: Encouraging a bare minimum while striving for the gold standard: a response to the updated WHO-WFSA guidelines.
Can J Anaesth. 2019 Jan;66(1):129-130. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1210-3. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
10
Does the harm component of the harmful dysfunction analysis need rethinking?: Reply to Powell and Scarffe.有害功能障碍分析中的危害成分需要重新思考吗？：对鲍威尔和斯卡夫的回应
J Med Ethics. 2019 Sep;45(9):594-596. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105578. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
本文引用的文献
1
Running from a Bear: How We Teach Vasopressors, Adrenoreceptors, and Shock.逃离熊：我们如何讲授血管加压药、肾上腺素能受体与休克
ATS Sch. 2023 Feb 13;4(2):216-229. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0132HT. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Angiotensin II Infusion for Shock: A Multicenter Study of Postmarketing Use.血管紧张素 II 输注治疗休克：上市后使用的多中心研究。
Chest. 2021 Feb;159(2):596-605. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.2074. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
3
The effect of angiotensin II on blood pressure in patients with circulatory shock: a structured review of the literature.血管紧张素 II 对循环休克患者血压的影响：文献的系统评价。
Crit Care. 2017 Dec 28;21(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1896-6.
4
Angiotensin II for the Treatment of Vasodilatory Shock.血管紧张素 II 用于治疗血管舒张性休克。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2604. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1714511.
5
Intravenous angiotensin II for the treatment of high-output shock (ATHOS trial): a pilot study.静脉输注血管紧张素II治疗高输出量休克（ATHOS试验）：一项试点研究。
Crit Care. 2014 Oct 6;18(5):534. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0534-9.
6
Hyperreninemic hypoaldosteronism: a possible etiological factor of septic shock-induced acute renal failure.高肾素性低醛固酮血症：脓毒症休克诱导的急性肾衰竭的一个可能病因。
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Oct;29(10):1703-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1986-6. Epub 2003 Aug 28.
7
Nitric oxide-dependent down-regulation of angiotensin II type 2 receptors during experimental sepsis.
Crit Care Med. 2001 Sep;29(9):1750-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200109000-00016.
Zotero 插件