• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
High-Cost Drug Policies in Canadian Children's Hospitals: An Exploratory Study.加拿大儿童医院的高成本药品政策:一项探索性研究。
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2023;28(4):343-347. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-28.4.343. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Priority-setting for hospital funding of high-cost innovative drugs and therapeutics: A qualitative institutional case study.优先考虑医院为高成本创新药物和疗法提供资金:一项定性的机构案例研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 18;19(3):e0300519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300519. eCollection 2024.
5
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
6
Engaging the Canadian public on reimbursement decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: a national online survey.让加拿大公众参与罕见病药物报销决策:一项全国性在线调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 26;17(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2310-4.
7
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
8
Policy and procedures for domestic violence patients in Canadian emergency departments: a national survey.加拿大急诊科家庭暴力患者的政策与程序:一项全国性调查。
J Emerg Nurs. 1996 Aug;22(4):278-82. doi: 10.1016/s0099-1767(96)80014-6.
9
Access to novel drugs and therapeutics for children and youth: Eliciting citizens' values to inform public funding decisions.为儿童和青少年获取新型药物和疗法:征求公民价值观以告知公共资金决策。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):715-727. doi: 10.1111/hex.13697. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
10
Ethics consultation in children's hospitals: results from a survey of pediatric clinical ethicists.儿童医院的伦理咨询:对儿科临床伦理学家的调查结果。
Pediatrics. 2010 Apr;125(4):742-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1813. Epub 2010 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Institutional Priority-Setting for Novel Drugs and Therapeutics: A Qualitative Systematic Review.新型药物和疗法的机构优先排序:定性系统评价。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:7494. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.7494. Epub 2024 Feb 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Cellular Therapy in Pediatric Hematologic Malignancies.儿科血液恶性肿瘤的细胞治疗。
Clin Lab Med. 2021 Mar;41(1):121-132. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2020.10.008.
2
The Moral Foundations of Child Health and Social Policies: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis.儿童健康与社会政策的道德基础:批判性解释性综述
Children (Basel). 2021 Jan 13;8(1):43. doi: 10.3390/children8010043.
3
Pediatric drug data in Canadian drug monographs: a descriptive analysis.加拿大药品说明书中的儿科用药数据:描述性分析
CMAJ Open. 2020 Aug 31;8(3):E522-E529. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200010. Print 2020 Jul-Sep.
4
Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy.儿科卫生技术评估和药物政策的伦理和社会价值观。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Mar 1;11(3):374-382. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.144.
5
Modern approaches in gene therapy of motor neuron diseases.运动神经元病的基因治疗新方法。
Med Res Rev. 2021 Sep;41(5):2634-2655. doi: 10.1002/med.21705. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
6
'The problem is small enough, the problem is big enough': a qualitative study of health technology assessment and public policy on drug funding decisions for children.“问题虽小,却也重大”:儿童药物资金决策的卫生技术评估和公共政策的定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Mar 30;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01164-w.
7
Current and emerging biologics for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis.治疗幼年特发性关节炎的现有和新兴生物制剂。
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020 Jul;20(7):725-740. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2020.1733524. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
8
Risk-sharing agreements, present and future.风险分担协议,现状与未来。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2018 Apr 10;12:823. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.823. eCollection 2018.
9
Public drug policy for children in Canada.加拿大针对儿童的公共药品政策。
CMAJ. 2017 Jul 31;189(30):E990-E994. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170380.
10
Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.报告定性研究的标准:建议的综合。
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.

加拿大儿童医院的高成本药品政策:一项探索性研究。

High-Cost Drug Policies in Canadian Children's Hospitals: An Exploratory Study.

作者信息

Pucchio Aidan, Rieder Michael

机构信息

School of Medicine (AP), Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Departments of Paediatrics, Physiology & Pharmacology and Medicine (MR), University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2023;28(4):343-347. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-28.4.343. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

DOI:10.5863/1551-6776-28.4.343
PMID:37795289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10547051/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Over the past decade a number of effective but costly drugs have entered the therapeutic arena. Ethical and logistical challenges associated with including children in research and policy have produced variability in public policy on funding pediatric drugs, with inconsistent coverage across Canada. The purpose of this study was to explore the processes for funding high-cost pediatric drugs in Canadian children's hospitals.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional, text-based survey of all 19 chairs of Canadian departments of pediatrics about the funding and accessibility of high-cost drugs. Thematic qualitative analysis was performed to organize, sort, and code verbatim written responses and follow-up correspondence.

RESULTS

Responses were received from all 19 Canadian departments of pediatrics surveyed (100% response rate). Three major themes emerged about pediatric high-cost drug policies: inconsistency between funding processes, variability in funding sources, and frustration with the current system. In aggregate, a clear concern emerged that current funding options were heterogenous and inadequate to meet patient needs.

CONCLUSIONS

There was widespread consensus from respondents that current options for funding pediatric high-cost drugs were inadequate and that there was need for urgent action to address this problem. Policy changes are needed to sustain and improve access to high-cost drugs for Canadian children. We propose 3 solutions, including the creation of a national framework for funding high-cost pediatric drugs, increased incorporation of pediatric considerations in drug research and development, and a multidisciplinary drug summit on pediatric therapeutics.

摘要

目的

在过去十年中,一些有效但昂贵的药物进入了治疗领域。在研究和政策中纳入儿童所涉及的伦理和后勤挑战导致了儿科药物资助公共政策的差异,加拿大各地的覆盖范围不一致。本研究的目的是探讨加拿大儿童医院为高成本儿科药物提供资金的流程。

方法

我们对加拿大所有19个儿科系主任进行了一项基于文本的横断面调查,内容涉及高成本药物的资助和可及性。进行了主题定性分析,以组织、分类和编码逐字书面回复及后续通信。

结果

收到了所调查的加拿大所有19个儿科系的回复(回复率为100%)。出现了关于儿科高成本药物政策的三个主要主题:资助流程之间的不一致、资金来源的差异以及对当前系统的不满。总体而言,一个明显的担忧是当前的资助选择多种多样,不足以满足患者需求。

结论

受访者普遍达成共识,即目前为儿科高成本药物提供资金的选择不足,需要采取紧急行动来解决这一问题。需要进行政策变革,以维持和改善加拿大儿童获得高成本药物的机会。我们提出了三种解决方案,包括建立一个为高成本儿科药物提供资金的国家框架、在药物研发中更多地纳入儿科考量因素以及召开一次关于儿科治疗的多学科药物峰会。