• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Unsafe care in residential settings for older adults: a content analysis of accreditation reports.老年人居住环境中的不安全护理:认证报告的内容分析。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Oct 26;35(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad085.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Risk Management of Information Systems in Australian Residential Aged Care Homes.电子健康记录对澳大利亚老年护理院信息系统风险管理的影响。
J Med Syst. 2016 Sep;40(9):204. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0553-y. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
6
Analysis of the nature and contributory factors of medication safety incidents following hospital discharge using National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) data from England and Wales: a multi-method study.利用来自英格兰和威尔士的国家报告与学习系统(NRLS)数据对出院后用药安全事件的性质和促成因素进行分析:一项多方法研究。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2023 Mar 16;14:20420986231154365. doi: 10.1177/20420986231154365. eCollection 2023.
7
Analysing 'big picture' policy reform mechanisms: the Australian health service safety and quality accreditation scheme.分析“宏观”政策改革机制:澳大利亚医疗服务安全与质量认证计划
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):3110-22. doi: 10.1111/hex.12300. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
Sources of unsafe primary care for older adults: a mixed-methods analysis of patient safety incident reports.老年人不安全初级保健的来源:对患者安全事件报告的混合方法分析。
Age Ageing. 2017 Sep 1;46(5):833-839. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx044.
10

引用本文的文献

1
The quality of care delivered to residents in long-term care in Australia: an indicator-based review of resident records (CareTrack Aged study).澳大利亚长期护理中向居民提供的护理质量:基于指标的居民记录审查(CareTrack 老年研究)。
BMC Med. 2024 Jan 23;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03224-8.

本文引用的文献

1
A Scoping Review of Adverse Incidents Research in Aged Care Homes: Learnings, Gaps, and Challenges.老年护理院不良事件研究的范围综述:经验教训、差距与挑战
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2022 Dec 20;8:23337214221144192. doi: 10.1177/23337214221144192. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
2
Predictors of response rates of safety culture questionnaires in healthcare: a systematic review and analysis.预测医疗保健安全文化调查问卷应答率的因素:系统评价与分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 16;12(9):e065320. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065320.
3
The effect of information technology intervention on using appropriate VTE prophylaxis in non-surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.信息技术干预对非手术患者使用适当静脉血栓栓塞预防措施的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Digit Health. 2022 Aug 17;8:20552076221118828. doi: 10.1177/20552076221118828. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
4
The Science of Learning Health Systems: Scoping Review of Empirical Research.学习型健康系统科学:实证研究的范围综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Feb 23;10(2):e34907. doi: 10.2196/34907.
5
Incident Reporting Systems: What Will It Take to Make Them Less Frustrating and Achieve Anything Useful?事件报告系统:如何才能让它们不再令人沮丧并发挥实际作用?
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021 Dec;47(12):755-758. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.10.001. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
6
Incidence of adverse incidents in residential aged care.养老机构中不良事件的发生率。
Aust Health Rev. 2022 Aug;46(4):405-413. doi: 10.1071/AH21090.
7
The impact of hospital accreditation on the quality of healthcare: a systematic literature review.医院认证对医疗质量的影响:系统文献回顾。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 6;21(1):1057. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07097-6.
8
How to sustainably build capacity in quality improvement within a healthcare organisation: a deep-dive, focused qualitative analysis.如何在医疗机构内可持续地建立质量改进能力:深入、聚焦的定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 18;21(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06598-8.
9
A Systematic Review to Examine the Evidence in Developing Social Prescribing Interventions That Apply a Co-Productive, Co-Designed Approach to Improve Well-Being Outcomes in a Community Setting.系统评价:考察在社区环境中应用共同生产、共同设计方法来改善福祉结果的社会处方干预措施的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 8;18(8):3896. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083896.
10
Learning from safety incidents in high-reliability organizations: a systematic review of learning tools that could be adapted and used in healthcare.从高可靠性组织的安全事件中学习:对可在医疗保健领域改编和应用的学习工具的系统评价
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Mar 17;33(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab046.

老年人居住环境中的不安全护理:认证报告的内容分析。

Unsafe care in residential settings for older adults: a content analysis of accreditation reports.

机构信息

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia.

IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Oct 26;35(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad085.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzad085
PMID:37795694
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10654691/
Abstract

Residents of aged care services can experience safety incidents resulting in preventable serious harm. Accreditation is a commonly used strategy to improve the quality of care; however, narrative information within accreditation reports is not generally analysed as a source of safety information to inform learning. In Australia, the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (ACQSC), the sector regulator, undertakes over 500 accreditation assessments of residential aged care services against eight national standards every year. From these assessments, the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission generates detailed Site Audit Reports. In over one-third (37%) of Site Audit Reports, standards relating to Personal and Clinical Care (Standard 3) are not being met. The aim of this study was to identify the types of resident Safety Risks that relate to Personal and Clinical Care Standards not being met during accreditation or re-accreditation. These data could inform priority setting at policy, regulatory, and service levels. An analytical framework was developed based on the World Health Organization's International Classification for Patient Safety and other fields including Clinical Issue (the issue related to the incident impacting the resident, e.g. wound/skin or pain). Information relating to safety incidents in the Site Audit Reports was extracted, and a content analysis undertaken using the analytical framework. Clinical Issue and the International Classification for Patient Safety-based classification were combined to describe a clinically intuitive category ('Safety Risks') to describe ways in which residents could experience unsafe care, e.g. diagnosis/assessment of pain. The resulting data were descriptively analysed. The analysis included 65 Site Audit Reports that were undertaken between September 2020 and March 2021. There were 2267 incidents identified and classified into 274 types of resident Safety Risks. The 12 most frequently occurring Safety Risks account for only 32.3% of all incidents. Relatively frequently occurring Safety Risks were organisation management of infection control; diagnosis/assessment of pain, restraint, resident behaviours, and falls; and multiple stages of wounds/skin management, e.g. diagnosis/assessment, documentation, treatment, and deterioration. The analysis has shown that accreditation reports contain valuable data that may inform prioritization of resident Safety Risks in the Australian residential aged care sector. A large number of low-frequency resident Safety Risks were detected in the accreditation reports. To address these, organizations may use implementation science approaches to facilitate evidence-based strategies to improve the quality of care delivered to residents. Improving the aged care workforces' clinical skills base may address some of the Safety Risks associated with diagnosis/assessment and wound management.

摘要

养老服务机构的居民可能会经历安全事件,导致可预防的严重伤害。认证是提高护理质量的常用策略;然而,认证报告中的叙述信息通常不作为安全信息的来源进行分析,以提供学习信息。在澳大利亚,行业监管机构老年护理质量和安全委员会(ACQSC)每年对 8 项国家标准下的 500 多家养老院进行评估。从这些评估中,老年护理质量和安全委员会生成详细的现场审计报告。在超过三分之一(37%)的现场审计报告中,与个人和临床护理相关的标准(标准 3)未得到满足。这项研究的目的是确定与认证或再认证期间个人和临床护理标准未得到满足相关的居民安全风险类型。这些数据可以为政策、监管和服务层面的优先事项设定提供信息。根据世界卫生组织的患者安全国际分类和其他领域(如与影响居民的事件相关的临床问题),制定了一个分析框架。从现场审计报告中提取与安全事件相关的信息,并使用分析框架进行内容分析。将临床问题和基于患者安全国际分类的分类结合起来,描述了一种直观的临床类别(“安全风险”),以描述居民可能经历不安全护理的方式,例如疼痛的诊断/评估。对所得数据进行描述性分析。分析包括 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 3 月期间进行的 65 份现场审计报告。确定了 2267 起事件,并将其分类为 274 种居民安全风险类型。出现频率最高的 12 种安全风险仅占所有事件的 32.3%。出现频率较高的安全风险包括感染控制的组织管理;疼痛、约束、居民行为和跌倒的诊断/评估;以及多个阶段的伤口/皮肤管理,例如诊断/评估、文件记录、治疗和恶化。分析表明,认证报告包含有价值的数据,可能为澳大利亚养老院居民安全风险的优先级排序提供信息。在认证报告中发现了大量低频率的居民安全风险。为了解决这些问题,组织可能会使用实施科学方法来促进循证策略,以提高向居民提供的护理质量。提高老年护理人员的临床技能基础可能会解决与诊断/评估和伤口管理相关的一些安全风险。