• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用积极的患者反馈改善医疗服务:系统范围界定综述。

Health service improvement using positive patient feedback: Systematic scoping review.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Care Opinion, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0275045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275045. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0275045
PMID:37796785
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10553339/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare services regularly receive patient feedback, most of which is positive. Empirical studies suggest that health services can use positive feedback to create patient benefit. Our aim was to map all available empirical evidence for how positive patient feedback creates change in healthcare settings.

METHODS

Empirical studies in English were systematically identified through database searches (ACM Digital Library, AMED, ASSIA, CINAHL, MEDLINE and PsycINFO), forwards and backwards citation, and expert consultation. We summarise the characteristics of included studies and the feedback they consider, present a thematic synthesis of qualitative findings, and provide narrative summaries of quantitative findings.

RESULTS

68 papers were included, describing research conducted across six continents, with qualitative (n = 51), quantitative (n = 10), and mixed (n = 7) methods. Only two studies were interventional. The most common settings were hospitals (n = 27) and community healthcare (n = 19). The most common recipients were nurses (n = 29). Most outcomes described were desirable. These were categorised as (a) short-term emotional change for healthcare workers (including feeling motivated and improved psychological wellbeing); (b) work-home interactional change for healthcare workers (such as improved home-life relationships); (c) work-related change for healthcare workers (such as improved performance and staff retention). Some undesirable outcomes were described, including envy when not receiving positive feedback. The impact of feedback may be moderated by characteristics of particular healthcare roles, such as night shift workers having less interaction time with patients. Some factors moderating the change created by feedback are modifiable.

CONCLUSION

Further interventional research is required to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of receiving positive feedback in creating specific forms of change such as increases in staff retention. Healthcare managers may wish to use positive feedback more regularly, and to address barriers to staff receiving feedback.

摘要

背景

医疗服务机构经常收到患者的反馈,其中大部分是积极的。实证研究表明,卫生服务机构可以利用积极的反馈来为患者带来益处。我们的目的是绘制所有现有的实证证据,说明积极的患者反馈如何在医疗保健环境中产生变化。

方法

通过数据库搜索(ACM 数字图书馆、AMED、ASSIA、CINAHL、MEDLINE 和 PsycINFO)、向前和向后引用以及专家咨询,系统地确定了英文实证研究。我们总结了纳入研究的特征以及他们所考虑的反馈,对定性结果进行主题综合,并对定量结果进行叙述性总结。

结果

共纳入 68 篇论文,描述了跨越六大洲的研究,采用定性(n=51)、定量(n=10)和混合(n=7)方法。只有两项研究是干预性的。最常见的设置是医院(n=27)和社区医疗保健(n=19)。最常见的接受者是护士(n=29)。描述的大多数结果都是理想的。这些结果可以分为:(a)医护人员的短期情绪变化,包括感到有动力和改善心理健康;(b)医护人员的工作-家庭互动变化,例如改善家庭生活关系;(c)医护人员的工作相关变化,例如提高绩效和员工保留率。还描述了一些不理想的结果,包括当没有收到积极反馈时产生的嫉妒。反馈的影响可能会受到特定医疗角色特征的调节,例如夜班工作人员与患者的互动时间较少。一些调节反馈所产生变化的因素是可调节的。

结论

需要进一步进行干预性研究,以评估接受积极反馈在创造特定形式的变化方面的有效性和成本效益,例如增加员工保留率。医疗保健管理人员可能希望更频繁地使用积极反馈,并解决员工接收反馈的障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d7/10553339/c91263c72fa5/pone.0275045.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d7/10553339/c91263c72fa5/pone.0275045.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d7/10553339/c91263c72fa5/pone.0275045.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Health service improvement using positive patient feedback: Systematic scoping review.利用积极的患者反馈改善医疗服务:系统范围界定综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0275045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275045. eCollection 2023.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review.在疾病爆发、流行或大流行期间及之后,为支持一线卫生和社会护理专业人员的适应能力和心理健康所采取的干预措施:一项混合方法的系统评价
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11(11):CD013779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013779.
4
Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.卫生工作者对使用移动健康技术提供初级卫生保健服务的看法和体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 26;3(3):CD011942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011942.pub2.
5
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
8
Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.常规产前服务的提供与接受情况:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012392.pub2.
9
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
10
Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare integration: a scoping review of qualitative evidence.医护人员对初级医疗一体化的认知和体验:定性证据的范围综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 19;7(7):CD013603. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013603.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
An Exploration of Online Positive Feedback in Relation to Mental Health Nursing Practice.关于心理健康护理实践的在线积极反馈探索
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Jul;34(4):e70116. doi: 10.1111/inm.70116.
2
What Drives Trust and Satisfaction in Health Welfare Social Cooperatives?是什么推动了健康福利社会合作社中的信任与满意度?
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 10;13(12):1383. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121383.
3
Perception of the Rural Community Regarding the Role of Nursing Professionals: A Study in the High Andean Regions of Peru.

本文引用的文献

1
Healthcare Dilemma Towards Gift Giving by Patients.患者送礼引发的医疗困境。
Malays J Med Sci. 2021 Oct;28(5):137-141. doi: 10.21315/mjms2021.28.5.14. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
2
Qualitative Investigation into the Mental Health of Healthcare Workers in Japan during the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间日本医护人员心理健康的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 5;19(1):568. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010568.
3
How and when service beneficiaries' gratitude enriches employees' daily lives.服务受益人感恩之情如何丰富员工日常生活,以及何时丰富员工日常生活。
农村社区对护理专业人员角色的认知:秘鲁安第斯高原地区的一项研究。
Nurs Rep. 2025 Apr 29;15(5):148. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15050148.
4
Recognising the Value of Everyday Interactions in Inpatient CAMHS: Patient Thank-You Letters as Insights Into Nursing Impact.认识住院儿童与青少年精神健康服务中日常互动的价值:患者感谢信作为洞察护理影响的依据
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70062. doi: 10.1111/inm.70062.
5
Increasing the Impact and Value of Laboratory Medicine Through Effective and AI-Assisted Communication.通过有效且人工智能辅助的沟通提升检验医学的影响力和价值。
EJIFCC. 2025 Feb 28;36(1):12-25. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
New experience of implementing patient e-referral in the Iranian health system: a qualitative study.伊朗卫生系统中实施患者电子转诊的新体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02706-w.
7
Characteristics of positive feedback provided by UK health service users: content analysis of examples from two databases.英国卫生服务使用者提供的积极反馈特征:来自两个数据库的示例的内容分析。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 Sep 17;31(1):e101113. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101113.
8
Healthcare providers' communication experience in the pediatric intensive care unit: a phenomenological study.医疗机构在儿科重症监护病房的沟通体验:一项现象学研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 20;24(1):956. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11394-1.
9
Evaluation of SINERGIAPS, an intervention to improve patient safety in primary healthcare centers in Spain based on patients' perceptions and experiences: a protocol for a hybrid type I randomized clinical trial.评价 SINERGIAPS,一项基于患者感知和体验的改善西班牙初级保健中心患者安全的干预措施:一项混合类型 I 随机临床试验方案。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 26;12:1324940. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1324940. eCollection 2024.
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Jun;107(6):987-1008. doi: 10.1037/apl0000975. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
4
ASK ME!-Routine measurement of patient experience with patient safety in ambulatory care: A mixed-mode survey.在门诊护理中测量患者对患者安全的体验:一种混合模式调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0259252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259252. eCollection 2021.
5
The meaning of nursing practice for nurses who are retired yet continue to work in a rural or remote community.退休后仍继续在农村或偏远社区工作的护士的护理实践意义。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Nov 6;20(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00721-0.
6
An outbreak of appreciation: A discursive analysis of tweets of gratitude expressed to the National Health Service at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic.感激之情的爆发:对 COVID-19 大流行初期向国民保健制度表示感谢的推文的话语分析。
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):149-162. doi: 10.1111/hex.13359. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
8
The impact of real-time patient feedback using a gamified system.使用游戏化系统的实时患者反馈的影响。
Nurs Manage. 2020 Dec;51(12):14-21. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000721812.13386.81.
9
The experiences of cancer nurses working in four European countries: A qualitative study.在四个欧洲国家工作的癌症护士的经验:一项定性研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Dec;49:101844. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101844. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
10
Gratitude in Health Care: A Meta-narrative Review.医疗保健中的感恩之情:一项元叙事综述
Qual Health Res. 2020 Dec;30(14):2303-2315. doi: 10.1177/1049732320951145. Epub 2020 Sep 13.