• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于在教育、医疗保健和研究中使用 ChatGPT 的探索性调查。

An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292216. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0292216
PMID:37796786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10553335/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

ChatGPT is the first large language model (LLM) to reach a large, mainstream audience. Its rapid adoption and exploration by the population at large has sparked a wide range of discussions regarding its acceptable and optimal integration in different areas. In a hybrid (virtual and in-person) panel discussion event, we examined various perspectives regarding the use of ChatGPT in education, research, and healthcare.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We surveyed in-person and online attendees using an audience interaction platform (Slido). We quantitatively analyzed received responses on questions about the use of ChatGPT in various contexts. We compared pairwise categorical groups with a Fisher's Exact. Furthermore, we used qualitative methods to analyze and code discussions.

RESULTS

We received 420 responses from an estimated 844 participants (response rate 49.7%). Only 40% of the audience had tried ChatGPT. More trainees had tried ChatGPT compared with faculty. Those who had used ChatGPT were more interested in using it in a wider range of contexts going forwards. Of the three discussed contexts, the greatest uncertainty was shown about using ChatGPT in education. Pros and cons were raised during discussion for the use of this technology in education, research, and healthcare.

DISCUSSION

There was a range of perspectives around the uses of ChatGPT in education, research, and healthcare, with still much uncertainty around its acceptability and optimal uses. There were different perspectives from respondents of different roles (trainee vs faculty vs staff). More discussion is needed to explore perceptions around the use of LLMs such as ChatGPT in vital sectors such as education, healthcare and research. Given involved risks and unforeseen challenges, taking a thoughtful and measured approach in adoption would reduce the likelihood of harm.

摘要

目的

ChatGPT 是第一个进入大众视野的大型语言模型(LLM)。它在人群中的迅速采用和探索引发了广泛的讨论,讨论其在不同领域的可接受性和最佳应用。在一次混合(虚拟和面对面)小组讨论活动中,我们探讨了关于在教育、研究和医疗保健中使用 ChatGPT 的各种观点。

材料和方法

我们使用观众互动平台(Slido)对现场和在线参与者进行了调查。我们对各种背景下使用 ChatGPT 的问题的反馈进行了定量分析。我们使用 Fisher 精确检验比较了两两分类组之间的差异。此外,我们还使用定性方法对讨论进行了分析和编码。

结果

我们从估计的 844 名参与者中收到了 420 条回复(回复率为 49.7%)。只有 40%的观众尝试过 ChatGPT。与教师相比,更多的学员尝试过 ChatGPT。那些使用过 ChatGPT 的人对在更广泛的范围内使用它更感兴趣。在讨论的三个领域中,在教育中使用 ChatGPT 的不确定性最大。在讨论教育、研究和医疗保健中使用这项技术的优缺点时,提出了正反两方面的观点。

讨论

对于在教育、研究和医疗保健中使用 ChatGPT 的问题,存在着各种观点,对于其可接受性和最佳用途仍然存在很大的不确定性。来自不同角色(学员、教师、员工)的受访者有不同的观点。需要进一步讨论,以探讨在教育、医疗保健和研究等重要领域使用像 ChatGPT 这样的大语言模型的看法。鉴于涉及的风险和不可预见的挑战,在采用时采取深思熟虑和慎重的方法将降低造成伤害的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0261/10553335/1929081b442f/pone.0292216.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0261/10553335/04bc81063fa3/pone.0292216.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0261/10553335/d896a81b4c57/pone.0292216.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0261/10553335/3cad8e27d4d6/pone.0292216.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0261/10553335/1929081b442f/pone.0292216.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0261/10553335/04bc81063fa3/pone.0292216.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0261/10553335/d896a81b4c57/pone.0292216.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0261/10553335/3cad8e27d4d6/pone.0292216.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0261/10553335/1929081b442f/pone.0292216.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research.关于在教育、医疗保健和研究中使用 ChatGPT 的探索性调查。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292216. eCollection 2023.
2
An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research.一项关于在教育、医疗保健和研究中使用ChatGPT的探索性调查。
medRxiv. 2023 Apr 3:2023.03.31.23287979. doi: 10.1101/2023.03.31.23287979.
3
ChatGPT as a Tool for Medical Education and Clinical Decision-Making on the Wards: Case Study.ChatGPT作为病房医学教育和临床决策工具:案例研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 8;8:e51346. doi: 10.2196/51346.
4
Incorporating ChatGPT in Medical Informatics Education: Mixed Methods Study on Student Perceptions and Experiential Integration Proposals.将 ChatGPT 融入医学信息学教育:学生认知和体验融入建议的混合方法研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Mar 20;10:e51151. doi: 10.2196/51151.
5
The tools of the future are the challenges of today: The use of ChatGPT in problem-based learning medical education.未来的工具就是今天的挑战:在以问题为基础的学习医学教育中使用 ChatGPT。
Med Teach. 2024 Mar;46(3):320-322. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2290997. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
6
Transforming Medical Education: Assessing the Integration of ChatGPT Into Faculty Workflows at a Caribbean Medical School.变革医学教育:评估ChatGPT在一所加勒比地区医学院融入教师工作流程的情况。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 5;15(7):e41399. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41399. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
Can ChatGPT outperform a neurosurgical trainee? A prospective comparative study.ChatGPT的表现能超过神经外科实习生吗?一项前瞻性对比研究。
Br J Neurosurg. 2024 Feb 2:1-10. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2024.2308222.
8
Interdisciplinary Inquiry via PanelGPT: Application to Explore Chatbot Application in Sports Rehabilitation.通过PanelGPT进行跨学科探究:探索聊天机器人在运动康复中的应用
medRxiv. 2023 Jul 27:2023.07.23.23292452. doi: 10.1101/2023.07.23.23292452.
9
Evaluation of ChatGPT's Real-Life Implementation in Undergraduate Dental Education: Mixed Methods Study.评价 ChatGPT 在本科牙科教育中的实际应用:混合方法研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Jan 31;10:e51344. doi: 10.2196/51344.
10
Medical Student Experiences and Perceptions of ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence: Cross-Sectional Study.医学生对 ChatGPT 和人工智能的体验和看法:一项横断面研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Dec 22;9:e51302. doi: 10.2196/51302.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a Popular Large Language Model in Orthopedic Literature Review: Comparison to Previously Published Reviews.评估一种流行的大型语言模型在骨科文献综述中的应用:与先前发表的综述进行比较。
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2025;13(8):460-469. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2025.84896.3874.
2
Advantages and Limitations of ChatGPT in Healthcare: A Scoping Review.ChatGPT在医疗保健领域的优势与局限:一项范围综述
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 11;8(9):e71219. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.71219. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
ChatGPT in Nursing: Applications, Advantages, and Challenges in Education, Research, and Clinical Practice.

本文引用的文献

1
ChatGPT makes medicine easy to swallow: an exploratory case study on simplified radiology reports.ChatGPT 让医学文献通俗易懂:简化放射学报告的探索性案例研究。
Eur Radiol. 2024 May;34(5):2817-2825. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10213-1. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
2
Chatbots, ChatGPT, and Scholarly Manuscripts: WAME Recommendations on ChatGPT and Chatbots in relation to scholarly publications.聊天机器人、ChatGPT与学术手稿:世界医学编辑协会关于ChatGPT和聊天机器人在学术出版方面的建议
Natl Med J India. 2023 Jan-Feb;36(1):1-4. doi: 10.25259/NMJI_365_23.
3
Scientists used ChatGPT to generate an entire paper from scratch - but is it any good?
护理领域中的ChatGPT:教育、研究及临床实践中的应用、优势与挑战
Ann Biomed Eng. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s10439-025-03832-w.
4
A concept-centric synthesis matrix framework (SMF) on application of Chat GPT in scientific writing: A journey from bigotry to Peril???关于Chat GPT在科学写作中的应用的以概念为中心的综合矩阵框架(SMF):从偏见走向危险的历程???
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2025 Apr-Jun;29(2):318-323. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_270_24. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
5
Embracing AI in academia: A mixed methods study of nursing students' and educators' perspectives on using ChatGPT.学术界对人工智能的接纳:一项关于护理专业学生和教育工作者对使用ChatGPT看法的混合方法研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 17;20(7):e0327981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327981. eCollection 2025.
6
Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Meta-Synthesis of Potentials and Pitfalls of ChatGPT.将人工智能融入医学教育:ChatGPT潜力与缺陷的元综合分析
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2025 Jul 1;13(3):155-172. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2024.104617.2071. eCollection 2025 Jul.
7
A Training Needs Analysis for AI and Generative AI in Medical Education: Perspectives of Faculty and Students.医学教育中人工智能与生成式人工智能的培训需求分析:教师与学生的观点
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025 May 14;12:23821205251339226. doi: 10.1177/23821205251339226. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
8
Perspectives and Experiences With Large Language Models in Health Care: Survey Study.医疗保健领域中大型语言模型的观点与经验:调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 1;27:e67383. doi: 10.2196/67383.
9
Knowledge and use, perceptions of benefits and limitations of artificial intelligence chatbots among Italian physiotherapy students: a cross-sectional national study.意大利物理治疗专业学生对人工智能聊天机器人的了解与使用、对其益处和局限性的认知:一项全国性横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07176-w.
10
Identifying healthcare needs with patient experience reviews using ChatGPT.使用ChatGPT通过患者体验评估来确定医疗保健需求。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 18;20(3):e0313442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313442. eCollection 2025.
科学家利用ChatGPT从零开始生成了一整篇论文——但它质量如何呢?
Nature. 2023 Jul;619(7970):443-444. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-02218-z.
4
ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations.医学领域的ChatGPT:其应用、优势、局限性、未来前景及伦理考量概述
Front Artif Intell. 2023 May 4;6:1169595. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1169595. eCollection 2023.
5
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review.对抗审稿人疲劳还是加剧偏见?关于在学术同行评审中使用ChatGPT和其他大语言模型的思考与建议。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023 May 18;8(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00133-5.
6
Exploring the Boundaries of Reality: Investigating the Phenomenon of Artificial Intelligence Hallucination in Scientific Writing Through ChatGPT References.探索现实的边界:通过ChatGPT参考文献研究科学写作中的人工智能幻觉现象。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 11;15(4):e37432. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37432. eCollection 2023 Apr.
7
The impact of AI and ChatGPT on research reporting.人工智能和 ChatGPT 对研究报告的影响。
N Z Med J. 2023 May 12;136(1575):60-64. doi: 10.26635/6965.6122.
8
Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers.使用检测器和不知情的人类评审员,将ChatGPT生成的科学摘要与真实摘要进行比较。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Apr 26;6(1):75. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00819-6.
9
Overview of Early ChatGPT's Presence in Medical Literature: Insights From a Hybrid Literature Review by ChatGPT and Human Experts.早期ChatGPT在医学文献中的呈现概述:来自ChatGPT与人类专家的混合文献综述的见解
Cureus. 2023 Apr 8;15(4):e37281. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37281. eCollection 2023 Apr.
10
ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns.ChatGPT在医学教育、研究与实践中的应用:对其前景与合理担忧的系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 19;11(6):887. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060887.