• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项开放性、随机临床试验比较 fidaxomicin 与口服万古霉素治疗同时接受抗生素治疗合并感染的住院患者的艰难梭菌感染。

An Open-Label, Randomized Trial Comparing Fidaxomicin With Oral Vancomycin for the Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Hospitalized Patients Receiving Concomitant Antibiotics for Concurrent Infections.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 17;78(2):277-282. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad606.

DOI:10.1093/cid/ciad606
PMID:37797310
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) occurs frequently, and concomitant antibiotic (CA) during the initial episode for treatment of non-CDI is a major risk factor. We sought to address the comparative efficacy of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in the setting of CA during the initial CDI episode.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, controlled, open-label trial at 2 hospitals in Ann Arbor, Michigan. We consecutively consented and enrolled hospitalized patients ≥18 years old with diarrhea, a positive test for C. difficile, and ≥1 qualifying CA. Complicated CDI, CDI treatment for >24 hours prior to enrollment, and planned long-term (>12 weeks) CA use were notable exclusions. Clinical cure was defined as resolution of diarrhea for 2 consecutive days maintained until 2 days after therapy, and rCDI as recurrent diarrhea with positive testing ≤30 days after initial treatment. Patients were randomized to fidaxomicin or vancomycin.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups of 144 patients. Rates of clinical cure (73% vs 62.9%, P = .195) and rCDI (3.3% vs 4.0%; P > .99) were similar for fidaxomicin and vancomycin in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol cohorts, respectively. Only 4 patients developed rCDI.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of patients with CDI receiving CA, a numerically higher proportion were cured with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin, but this result did not reach statistical significance. Overall recurrence was lower than anticipated in both arms compared with previous studies that did not extend duration of CDI treatment during CA.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02692651).

摘要

背景

复发性艰难梭菌感染(rCDI)很常见,在治疗非 CDI 的初始发作期间同时使用抗生素(CA)是一个主要的危险因素。我们旨在探讨在初始 CDI 发作期间使用 CA 时,非达霉素与万古霉素的相对疗效。

方法

我们在密歇根州安阿伯的 2 家医院进行了一项随机、对照、开放标签试验。我们连续同意并招募了≥18 岁的住院患者,这些患者有腹泻、艰难梭菌阳性检测结果和≥1 种符合条件的 CA。复杂的 CDI、在入组前 CDI 治疗>24 小时以及计划长期(>12 周)使用 CA 是显著的排除标准。临床治愈定义为连续 2 天腹泻缓解,直至治疗后 2 天,rCDI 定义为初始治疗后≤30 天复发腹泻和阳性检测结果。患者被随机分配到非达霉素或万古霉素组。

结果

144 例患者的两组基线特征相似。意向治疗和方案治疗队列中,非达霉素组的临床治愈率(73% vs. 62.9%,P=0.195)和 rCDI 发生率(3.3% vs. 4.0%;P>0.99)与万古霉素组相似。只有 4 例患者发生 rCDI。

结论

在这项接受 CA 的 CDI 患者研究中,与万古霉素相比,非达霉素治疗的患者治愈比例略高,但这一结果未达到统计学意义。与未延长 CA 期间 CDI 治疗持续时间的先前研究相比,两组的总体复发率均低于预期。

临床试验注册

www.clinicaltrials.gov(NCT02692651)。

相似文献

1
An Open-Label, Randomized Trial Comparing Fidaxomicin With Oral Vancomycin for the Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Hospitalized Patients Receiving Concomitant Antibiotics for Concurrent Infections.一项开放性、随机临床试验比较 fidaxomicin 与口服万古霉素治疗同时接受抗生素治疗合并感染的住院患者的艰难梭菌感染。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 17;78(2):277-282. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad606.
2
Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in adults.成人艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 3;3(3):CD004610. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004610.pub5.
3
Efficacy of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin as therapy for Clostridium difficile infection in individuals taking concomitant antibiotics for other concurrent infections. fidaxomicin 与万古霉素治疗同时使用抗生素治疗其他合并感染的个体中艰难梭菌感染的疗效。
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Sep;53(5):440-7. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir404.
4
Fidaxomicin versus metronidazole, vancomycin and their combination for initial episode, first recurrence and severe Clostridioides difficile infection - An observational cohort study. fidaxomicin 与甲硝唑、万古霉素及其联合治疗首发、首次复发和严重艰难梭菌感染的疗效比较:一项观察性队列研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;103:226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
5
Path of least recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridioides difficile infection.最小复发路径: fidaxomicin 与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2022 Nov;42(11):810-827. doi: 10.1002/phar.2734. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
6
Efficacy and safety of fidaxomicin for the treatment of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in a randomized, double-blind, comparative Phase III study in Japan.在日本进行的一项随机、双盲、对照III期研究中,非达霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的疗效和安全性。
J Infect Chemother. 2018 Sep;24(9):744-752. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
7
Treatment of first recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection: fidaxomicin versus vancomycin.艰难梭菌感染首次复发的治疗:非达霉素与万古霉素比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S154-61. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis462.
8
Relapse versus reinfection: recurrent Clostridium difficile infection following treatment with fidaxomicin or vancomycin.复发与再感染: fidaxomicin 或万古霉素治疗后的复发性艰难梭菌感染。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S104-9. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis357.
9
Microbiome-preserving antibiotics for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.保留肠道微生物群的抗生素治疗艰难梭菌感染:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Dec 19;28(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02878-z.
10
Fidaxomicin preserves the intestinal microbiome during and after treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and reduces both toxin reexpression and recurrence of CDI. fidaxomicin 在治疗艰难梭菌感染 (CDI) 期间和之后保留肠道微生物组,并减少毒素再表达和 CDI 的复发。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S132-42. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis338.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of infection in patients with haematological malignancies and after cellular therapy: guidelines from 10th European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL-10).血液系统恶性肿瘤患者及细胞治疗后感染的管理:第十届欧洲白血病感染会议(ECIL-10)指南
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Aug 7;87:103371. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103371. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Interaction Between Microbiota and Immunity: Molecular Mechanisms, Biological Functions, Diseases, and New Therapeutic Opportunities.微生物群与免疫的相互作用:分子机制、生物学功能、疾病及新的治疗机遇
MedComm (2020). 2025 Jun 19;6(7):e70265. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70265. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Incidence of fidaxomicin allergy in patients with macrolide allergies: a large database analysis.
大环内酯类过敏患者中 fidaxomicin 过敏的发生率:一项大型数据库分析。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025 Apr 2;69(4):e0192424. doi: 10.1128/aac.01924-24. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
4
Comparative effectiveness of different therapies for infection in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.成人感染不同治疗方法的比较效果:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Jan 5;49:101151. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101151. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Fidaxomicin versus oral vancomycin for infection among patients at high risk for recurrence based on real-world experience.基于真实世界经验,非达霉素与口服万古霉素治疗复发高风险患者感染的比较。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 4;45(11):1-7. doi: 10.1017/ice.2024.145.
6
Comparative Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Treating Refractory or Recurrent Infection among Patients with and without Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.粪便微生物群移植治疗炎症性肠病患者与非炎症性肠病患者难治性或复发性感染的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Biomedicines. 2024 Jun 23;12(7):1396. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12071396.
7
Management of Clostridioides difficile infection: an Italian Delphi consensus.艰难梭菌感染的管理:意大利德尔菲共识。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Sep 3;79(9):2103-2118. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae179.