• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Are diabetes self-management interventions delivered in the psychiatric inpatient setting effective? A protocol for a systematic review.在精神科住院环境中实施的糖尿病自我管理干预措施是否有效?一项系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 5;13(10):e069603. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069603.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
4
Are diabetes self-management programmes for the general diabetes population effective for people with severe mental illness?: a systematic review.一般糖尿病患者的糖尿病自我管理计划对严重精神疾病患者有效吗?:系统评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 25;20(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02779-7.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Long-term effectiveness of group-based diabetes self-management on glycosylated haemoglobin for people with type 2 diabetes in community: a protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.基于群组的糖尿病自我管理对 2 型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白长期效果的系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 30;11(6):e046692. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046692.
7
Effect of adjunctive glucose-lowering drugs on body weight in people with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol.1 型糖尿病患者辅助降糖药物对体重影响的系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 14;10(11):e038970. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038970.
8
Effectiveness and safety of self-management interventions among adult type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review protocol.撒哈拉以南非洲地区成年 2 型糖尿病患者自我管理干预措施的有效性和安全性:系统评价方案。
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Jan 1;20(1):204-213. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00062.
9
Effective components of exercise and physical activity-related behaviour-change interventions for chronic non-communicable diseases in Africa: protocol for a systematic mixed studies review with meta-analysis.非洲慢性非传染性疾病运动及与身体活动相关行为改变干预措施的有效组成部分:一项采用荟萃分析的系统混合研究综述方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 12;5(8):e008036. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008036.
10
Effectiveness of non-pharmacological strategies in the management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.非药物策略在初级保健中 2 型糖尿病管理中的有效性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 12;10(1):e034481. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034481.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping Barriers and Interventions to Diabetes Self-Management in Latino Youth: A Scoping Review.拉丁裔青少年糖尿病自我管理的障碍与干预措施映射:一项范围综述
Children (Basel). 2025 Jul 3;12(7):882. doi: 10.3390/children12070882.

本文引用的文献

1
Are diabetes self-management programmes for the general diabetes population effective for people with severe mental illness?: a systematic review.一般糖尿病患者的糖尿病自我管理计划对严重精神疾病患者有效吗?:系统评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 25;20(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02779-7.
2
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
3
Changing the Conversation: Diabetes Management in Adults With Severe Mental Illnesses and Type 2 Diabetes.改变对话:严重精神疾病和 2 型糖尿病成人的糖尿病管理。
Can J Diabetes. 2018 Dec;42(6):595-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
4
Detecting small-study effects and funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analysis of survival data: A comparison of new and existing tests.在生存数据分析的荟萃分析中检测小样本效应和漏斗图不对称性:新测试与现有测试的比较。
Res Synth Methods. 2018 Mar;9(1):41-50. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1266. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
5
Type 2 diabetes mellitus in people with severe mental illness: inequalities by ethnicity and age. Cross-sectional analysis of 588 408 records from the UK.患有严重精神疾病的 2 型糖尿病患者:按种族和年龄划分的不平等。对英国 588408 份记录的横断面分析。
Diabet Med. 2017 Jul;34(7):916-924. doi: 10.1111/dme.13298. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
6
Diabetes mellitus in people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: a systematic review and large scale meta-analysis.精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症患者中的糖尿病:一项系统评价和大规模荟萃分析。
World Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;15(2):166-74. doi: 10.1002/wps.20309.
7
Self management interventions for type 2 diabetes in adult people with severe mental illness.针对患有严重精神疾病的成年人2型糖尿病的自我管理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 27;4(4):CD011361. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011361.pub2.
8
Metabolic complications of schizophrenia and antipsychotic medications--an updated review.精神分裂症及抗精神病药物的代谢并发症——最新综述
East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;23(1):21-8.
9
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and metabolic abnormalities in schizophrenia and related disorders--a systematic review and meta-analysis.代谢综合征及代谢异常在精神分裂症及相关障碍中的流行情况——一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2013 Mar;39(2):306-18. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr148. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
10
Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验荟萃分析中检查和解释漏斗图不对称性的建议。
BMJ. 2011 Jul 22;343:d4002. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4002.

在精神科住院环境中实施的糖尿病自我管理干预措施是否有效?一项系统评价方案。

Are diabetes self-management interventions delivered in the psychiatric inpatient setting effective? A protocol for a systematic review.

机构信息

Leeds Institute of Health Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Higher Trainee in Old Age Psychiatry, Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 5;13(10):e069603. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069603.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069603
PMID:37798028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10565205/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, which is the most significant contributor to increased mortality due to natural causes in those with severe mental illness (SMI). Self-management interventions for diabetes have been shown to be effective in the general population, however, effects of these interventions in those with SMI is still unclear. Psychiatric admission could be used opportunistically to deliver interventions of this kind and help improve diabetes self-management. This review aims to assess whether interventions of this kind improve diabetes outcomes and have an effect on reducing cardiovascular risk.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This review will include studies assessing diabetes self-management interventions designed to be delivered to those aged 18 and over with comorbid type 2 diabetes and SMI during admission to psychiatric inpatient settings. Databases including the Cochrane Library, Medline, Psychinfo, CINAHL, Embase, WHO's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, International Health Technology Assessment Database, UK Clinical Research Network and ClinicalTrials.gov will be searched from inception to September 2022. Where possible, meta-analysis of included studies will be conducted. If heterogeneity is high and meta-analysis is not possible, we will use other means of data synthesis and will include a narrative description of included studies.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required as the systematic review will only include data from existing studies. The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and presentation at relevant national and international conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022357672.

摘要

简介

糖尿病是心血管疾病的一个主要危险因素,而心血管疾病是导致严重精神疾病(SMI)患者自然死亡的主要原因。针对糖尿病的自我管理干预措施已被证明在普通人群中是有效的,然而,这些干预措施在 SMI 患者中的效果仍不清楚。精神科住院可以作为提供这类干预的机会,帮助改善糖尿病的自我管理。本综述旨在评估这类干预措施是否能改善糖尿病的结果,并能降低心血管风险。

方法和分析

本综述将包括评估旨在为在精神科住院环境中患有 2 型糖尿病合并 SMI 的 18 岁及以上人群提供的糖尿病自我管理干预措施的研究。从成立到 2022 年 9 月,将检索包括 Cochrane 图书馆、Medline、Psychinfo、CINAHL、Embase、世界卫生组织的国际临床试验注册平台、国际卫生技术评估数据库、英国临床研究网络和 ClinicalTrials.gov 在内的数据库。如有可能,将对纳入的研究进行荟萃分析。如果异质性高且无法进行荟萃分析,我们将使用其他数据综合方法,并将包括对纳入研究的叙述性描述。

伦理和传播

由于系统评价仅包括现有研究的数据,因此不需要伦理批准。研究结果将通过同行评审的出版物和在相关的国家和国际会议上的演讲进行传播。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022357672。