• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烟气脱硫石膏与生物炭对盐碱土入渗特性及理化性质的相互作用。

Interactions between flue gas desulfurization gypsum and biochar on water infiltration characteristics and physicochemical properties of saline-alkaline soil.

机构信息

Research Center for Land Use and Ecological Security Governance in Mining Area, School of Public Policy and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.

College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Oct 6;195(11):1273. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11894-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10661-023-11894-3
PMID:37798370
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10556144/
Abstract

The application of flue gas desulfurization gypsum (FGDG) improves the soil structure, reduces soil pH, and accelerates soil salt leaching. Biochar amendment to soil can affect the soil infiltration rate, increase soil porosity, decrease soil bulk density, and enhance the water retention capacity. This study investigated the interactive effect of FGDG and biochar on water infiltration characteristics and physicochemical properties as well as determined the optimal amendment rate as a saline-alkaline soil conditioner. Seven experimental schemes were designed, and the newly reclaimed cultivated soil from Pingtan Comprehensive Experimental Zone in Fujian Province, China, was used in an indoor soil column experiment to simulate soil infiltration. Five models were employed to describe the infiltration process. The power function was used to represent the dynamic process of the wetting front. The conclusions of this study are as follows: (1) there was a reduction in the infiltration capacity of saline-alkaline soil (sandy soil) in each treatment, and the application of FGDG alone had the highest inhibition effect compared to the control (CK). The Kostiakov model provides the best fit for the experimental data of soil cumulative infiltration. (2) All treatments increased the total porosity and water content of saline-alkali soil, with the combined application of FGDG and biochar found to be more effective. (3) The application of FGDG alone or in combination with biochar decreased the pH and increased the electrical conductivity of the saline-alkali soil significantly, with the combined application having the most significant effect. In contrast, soil amended with biochar alone had minimal effect on the pH and EC of the soil. (4) The best improvement ratio was achieved with the F1B2 combination (75 g/kg FGDG + 30 g/kg biochar).

摘要

脱硫石膏(FGDG)的应用改善了土壤结构,降低了土壤 pH 值,并加速了土壤盐分淋洗。生物炭的添加可以影响土壤入渗率,增加土壤孔隙度,降低土壤容重,增强土壤持水能力。本研究探讨了 FGDG 和生物炭对水入渗特性和理化性质的交互作用,并确定了作为盐碱土改良剂的最佳添加率。设计了七个实验方案,使用来自中国福建平潭综合实验区的新开垦耕地进行室内土柱实验来模拟土壤入渗。采用了五个模型来描述入渗过程。幂函数被用来表示湿润锋的动态过程。本研究的结论如下:(1)盐碱土(沙土)的入渗能力在各处理中均有所降低,单独添加 FGDG 比对照(CK)的抑制效果最高。柯斯加科夫模型最适合土壤累积入渗的实验数据。(2)所有处理均增加了盐碱土的总孔隙度和含水量,FGDG 与生物炭的联合应用效果更为显著。(3)单独添加 FGDG 或与生物炭联合添加均显著降低了盐碱土的 pH 值和电导率,联合添加的效果最为显著。相比之下,单独添加生物炭对土壤的 pH 值和 EC 值影响最小。(4)F1B2 组合(75 g/kg FGDG + 30 g/kg 生物炭)的改良效果最好。

相似文献

1
Interactions between flue gas desulfurization gypsum and biochar on water infiltration characteristics and physicochemical properties of saline-alkaline soil.烟气脱硫石膏与生物炭对盐碱土入渗特性及理化性质的相互作用。
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Oct 6;195(11):1273. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11894-3.
2
Application of flue gas desulfurization gypsum improves multiple functions of saline-sodic soils across China.烟气脱硫石膏的应用改善了中国范围内多种盐渍-苏打土壤的功能。
Chemosphere. 2021 Aug;277:130345. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130345. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
3
Inhibiting effects of flue gas desulfurization gypsum on soil phosphorus loss in Chongming Dongtan, southeastern China.脱硫石膏对中国东南部崇明东滩土壤磷素流失的抑制作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jun;26(17):17195-17203. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05044-x. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
4
A critical review on the use of flue gas desulfurization gypsum to ameliorate saline-alkali soils and its prospect for reducing carbon emissions.关于利用烟气脱硫石膏改良盐碱地及其减排前景的批判性综述。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Oct 1;945:174053. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174053. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
5
Mitigating soil salinity stress with titanium gypsum and biochar composite materials: Improvement effects and mechanism.用钛石膏和生物炭复合材料缓解土壤盐渍化胁迫:改良效果与机理。
Chemosphere. 2023 Apr;321:138127. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138127. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
6
Vermicompost and flue gas desulfurization gypsum addition to saline-alkali soil decreases nitrogen losses and enhances nitrogen storage capacity by lowering sodium concentration and alkalinity.添加蚯蚓粪和烟气脱硫石膏可以降低钠离子浓度和碱度,从而减少盐碱地的氮素损失,提高氮素储存能力。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;368:122156. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122156. Epub 2024 Aug 11.
7
Optimizing biochar application to improve soil physical and hydraulic properties in saline-alkali soils.优化生物炭的应用以改善盐碱地的土壤物理和水力性质。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 1;771:144802. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144802. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
8
[Effects of Biochar and Soil Conditioner on Coastal Barren Saline-alkali Soil].生物炭与土壤改良剂对滨海盐碱荒地土壤的影响
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 Oct 8;44(10):5641-5648. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202210312.
9
[Effect of flue gas desulfurization gypsum application on remediation of acidified forest soil].[烟气脱硫石膏施用对酸化森林土壤修复的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2012 Jun;33(6):2006-12.
10
Alterations in the composition and metabolite profiles of the saline-alkali soil microbial community through biochar application.生物炭的施用改变了盐碱土微生物群落的组成和代谢产物谱。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb 14;352:120033. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120033. Epub 2024 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Biochar Loaded with a Bacterial Strain N33 Facilitates Pecan Seedling Growth and Shapes Rhizosphere Microbial Community.负载细菌菌株N33的生物炭促进山核桃幼苗生长并塑造根际微生物群落。
Plants (Basel). 2024 Apr 28;13(9):1226. doi: 10.3390/plants13091226.