• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于医生在众包竞赛中获胜的研究:服务内容和竞争环境的视角。

Research on the doctors' win in crowdsourcing competitions: perspectives on service content and competitive environment.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Wuhan Mental Health Center, Wuhan, China.

School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02309-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-023-02309-x
PMID:37798708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10557239/
Abstract

Medical crowdsourcing competitions can help patients get more efficient and comprehensive treatment advice than "one-to-one" service, and doctors should be encouraged to actively participate. In the crowdsourcing competitions, winning the crowdsourcing competition is the driving force for doctors to continue to participate in the service. Therefore, how to improve the winning probability needs to be revealed. From the service content and competitive environment perspectives, this study introduces doctor competence indicators to investigate the key influence factors of doctors' wins on the online platform. The results show that the emotional interaction in doctors' service content positively influences doctors' wins. However, the influence of information interaction presents heterogeneity. Conclusive information helps doctors win, while suggestive information negatively affects them. For the competitive environment, the competitive environment negatively moderates the relationship between doctors' service content and doctors' wins. The results of this study provide important contributions to the research on crowdsourcing competitions and online healthcare services and guide the participants of the competition, including patients, doctors, and platforms.

摘要

医疗众包竞赛可以帮助患者获得比“一对一”服务更高效、更全面的治疗建议,应鼓励医生积极参与。在众包竞赛中,赢得竞赛是医生继续参与服务的动力。因此,需要揭示如何提高获胜概率。从服务内容和竞争环境的角度出发,本研究引入医生能力指标,探讨医生在在线平台上获胜的关键影响因素。研究结果表明,医生服务内容中的情感互动对医生的获胜有积极影响。然而,信息互动的影响存在异质性。结论性信息有助于医生获胜,而暗示性信息则对他们不利。对于竞争环境,竞争环境负向调节医生服务内容与医生获胜之间的关系。本研究的结果为众包竞赛和在线医疗服务的研究做出了重要贡献,并为竞赛的参与者,包括患者、医生和平台提供了指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/10557239/36bdc998dfc3/12911_2023_2309_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/10557239/f085f10b5fd4/12911_2023_2309_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/10557239/36bdc998dfc3/12911_2023_2309_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/10557239/f085f10b5fd4/12911_2023_2309_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/10557239/36bdc998dfc3/12911_2023_2309_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Research on the doctors' win in crowdsourcing competitions: perspectives on service content and competitive environment.关于医生在众包竞赛中获胜的研究:服务内容和竞争环境的视角。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02309-x.
2
Factors Influencing Doctors' Participation in the Provision of Medical Services Through Crowdsourced Health Care Information Websites: Elaboration-Likelihood Perspective Study.影响医生通过众包医疗信息网站参与医疗服务提供的因素:详尽可能性视角研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jun 29;8(6):e16704. doi: 10.2196/16704.
3
Consulting doctors online after offline treatment: investigating the effects of online information on patients' effective use of online follow-up services.线下治疗后在线咨询医生:调查在线信息对患者有效使用在线随访服务的影响。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 9;12:1375144. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1375144. eCollection 2024.
4
Exploring Doctors' Willingness to Provide Online Counseling Services: The Roles of Motivations and Costs.探索医生提供在线咨询服务的意愿:动机和成本的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 22;17(1):110. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010110.
5
The Influence of Doctors' Online Reputation on the Sharing of Outpatient Experiences: Empirical Study.医生在线声誉对门诊经验分享的影响:实证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 11;22(12):e16691. doi: 10.2196/16691.
6
Effectiveness of Interactive Tools in Online Health Care Communities: Social Exchange Theory Perspective.在线医疗社区中互动工具的有效性:社会交换理论视角。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 12;23(3):e21892. doi: 10.2196/21892.
7
What factors shape doctors' trustworthiness? Patients' perspectives in the context of hypertension care in rural Tanzania.哪些因素塑造了医生的可信度?坦桑尼亚农村地区高血压护理背景下的患者观点。
Rural Remote Health. 2020 Aug;20(3):5826. doi: 10.22605/RRH5826. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
8
Self-referrals to a doctors' mental health service over 10 years.十年来向医生心理健康服务机构的自我转诊情况。
Occup Med (Lond). 2014 Apr;64(3):172-6. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqt177. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
9
[Influence of patients' attitude on doctors' satisfaction with the doctor-patient relationship].[患者态度对医生医患关系满意度的影响]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2009 Apr 18;41(2):141-3.
10
Do doctors' attachment styles and emotional intelligence influence patients' emotional expressions in primary care consultations? An exploratory study using multilevel analysis.医生的依恋风格和情绪智力是否会影响初级保健咨询中患者的情绪表达?一项使用多层次分析的探索性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Apr;101(4):659-664. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The spatial spillover effects of digital transformation on healthcare services quality.数字转型对医疗服务质量的空间溢出效应。
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 9;11:20552076251374407. doi: 10.1177/20552076251374407. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Extending Signaling Theory in Online Health Communities to Address Medical Information Asymmetry: Systematic Review With Narrative Synthesis.扩展在线健康社区中的信号理论以解决医学信息不对称:叙事综合的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 1;27:e73208. doi: 10.2196/73208.
3
Offline visit intention of online patients: the Grice's maxims and patient involvement.

本文引用的文献

1
Online selection of a physician by patients: the impression formation perspective.患者在线选择医生:印象形成视角。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jul 25;22(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01936-0.
2
Patients need emotional support: Managing physician disclosure information to attract more patients.患者需要情感支持:管理医生披露信息以吸引更多患者。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Dec 25;158:104674. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104674.
3
Improving Health Promotion Through the Integration of Technology, Crowdsourcing, and Social Media.
线上患者的线下就诊意愿:格赖斯准则与患者参与度
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02861-8.
通过整合技术、众包和社交媒体促进健康
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Mar;21(2):228-237. doi: 10.1177/1524839918811152. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
4
Applications of crowdsourcing in health: an overview.众包在健康领域的应用:综述。
J Glob Health. 2018 Jun;8(1):010502. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.010502.
5
Globalizing and crowdsourcing biomedical research.全球化与众包生物医学研究
Br Med Bull. 2016 Dec;120(1):27-33. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldw044. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
6
The Emerging Issue of Digital Empathy.数字同理心的新问题
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 May 25;80(4):58. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80458.
7
Crowdsourcing: an overview and applications to ophthalmology.众包:概述及其在眼科中的应用
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016 May;27(3):256-61. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000251.
8
Crowdsourcing in biomedicine: challenges and opportunities.生物医学中的众包:挑战与机遇。
Brief Bioinform. 2016 Jan;17(1):23-32. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbv021. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
9
CoDiagnose: Interactive software to harness collaborative diagnoses and to increase diagnostic accuracy amongst junior physicians.联合诊断:用于进行协作诊断并提高初级医师诊断准确性的交互式软件。
Technol Health Care. 2015;23(3):243-56. doi: 10.3233/THC-150892.
10
Health 2050: The Realization of Personalized Medicine through Crowdsourcing, the Quantified Self, and the Participatory Biocitizen.《健康 2050:通过众包、量化自我和参与式生物公民实现个性化医疗》
J Pers Med. 2012 Sep 12;2(3):93-118. doi: 10.3390/jpm2030093.