• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PsyCARE 研究:评估意大利卫生部“心理奖金”政策的影响、成本效益和跨诊断因素。

PsyCARE study: assessing impact, cost-effectiveness, and transdiagnostic factors of the Italian ministry of health's "psychological bonus" policy.

机构信息

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2023 Oct 5;11(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01345-6.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-023-01345-6
PMID:37798802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10557166/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of anxiety and depression disorders is surging worldwide, prompting a pressing demand for psychological interventions, especially in less severe cases. Responding to this need, the Italian government implemented the "Psychological Bonus" (PB) policy, allotting 25 million euros for mental health support. This policy entitles individuals to a minimum of four to twelve psychological sessions. In collaboration with the National Board of Italian Psychologists, our study assesses this policy's effectiveness. Indeed, the PsyCARE study aims to examine the utilization of the Psychological Bonus, evaluate its impact on adult and adolescent participants' psychological well-being through pre- and post-intervention assessments and six-month follow-up, and conduct a longitudinal cost-effectiveness analysis of this policy. A secondary aim is to investigate the influence of these interventions on transdiagnostic factors, including emotion regulation and epistemic trust.

METHODS

The study involves licensed psychotherapists and their patients, both adults and adolescents, benefiting from the Psychological Bonus. Data collection is underway and set to conclude in December 2023. Psychotherapists will provide diagnostic information and assess patient functioning. In addition, patients will be evaluated on mental health aspects such as clinical symptoms, emotion regulation, epistemic trust, and quality of life. We will employ linear mixed-effects models to analyze the outcomes, accounting for both fixed and random effects to capture the hierarchical structure of the data.

DISCUSSION

We anticipate the study's findings will highlight reduced psychological distress and improved quality of life for participants and demonstrate the Psychological Bonus policy's cost-effectiveness. The study will gather data on the role of specific versus nonspecific therapeutic factors in psychotherapy while adopting a patient-tailored approach to identify effective therapeutic elements and examine transdiagnostic factors. Overall, this study's findings will guide future measures within the Italian healthcare system, fostering a psychological health culture and providing valuable insights to the broader public.

STUDY REGISTRATION

https://osf.io/6zk2j.

摘要

背景

焦虑和抑郁障碍的患病率在全球范围内呈飙升趋势,因此迫切需要心理干预措施,尤其是在病情不太严重的情况下。为了满足这一需求,意大利政府实施了“心理奖金”(PB)政策,拨款 2500 万欧元用于心理健康支持。该政策允许个人获得至少四到十二次的心理治疗。我们的研究与意大利国家心理学家委员会合作,评估了该政策的有效性。实际上,PsyCARE 研究旨在评估“心理奖金”的使用情况,通过干预前后的评估和六个月的随访,评估其对成年和青少年参与者心理健康的影响,并对该政策进行纵向成本效益分析。次要目标是研究这些干预措施对跨诊断因素(包括情绪调节和认知信任)的影响。

方法

研究涉及受益于“心理奖金”的持照心理治疗师及其成年和青少年患者。数据收集正在进行中,预计将于 2023 年 12 月结束。心理治疗师将提供诊断信息并评估患者的功能。此外,患者将在心理健康方面进行评估,如临床症状、情绪调节、认知信任和生活质量。我们将使用线性混合效应模型分析结果,同时考虑固定效应和随机效应,以捕捉数据的层次结构。

讨论

我们预计研究结果将表明参与者的心理困扰减少,生活质量提高,并证明“心理奖金”政策具有成本效益。该研究将收集关于特定与非特定治疗因素在心理治疗中的作用的数据,同时采用患者量身定制的方法来确定有效的治疗元素,并研究跨诊断因素。总的来说,这项研究的结果将为意大利医疗保健系统提供未来措施的指导,培养一种心理健康文化,并为更广泛的公众提供有价值的见解。

研究注册

https://osf.io/6zk2j。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb8d/10557166/7cdef3eabe38/40359_2023_1345_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb8d/10557166/7cdef3eabe38/40359_2023_1345_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb8d/10557166/7cdef3eabe38/40359_2023_1345_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
PsyCARE study: assessing impact, cost-effectiveness, and transdiagnostic factors of the Italian ministry of health's "psychological bonus" policy.PsyCARE 研究:评估意大利卫生部“心理奖金”政策的影响、成本效益和跨诊断因素。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Oct 5;11(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01345-6.
2
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
3
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
4
A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of group transdiagnostic cognitive-behaviour therapy for anxiety disorders in primary care: study protocol.一项在初级保健中针对焦虑障碍的群组跨诊断认知行为疗法的实用随机对照试验:研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 3;18(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1898-1.
5
Increasing the effectiveness of psychotherapy in routine care through blended therapy with transdiagnostic online modules (PsyTOM): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.通过混合治疗(transdiagnostic online modules,简称 TOM)与跨诊断在线模块,提高常规治疗中的心理治疗效果(PsyTOM):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Sep 30;23(1):830. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06757-0.
6
Evaluating effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group psychological intervention using cognitive behavioural strategies for women with common mental disorders in conflict-affected rural Pakistan: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估针对巴基斯坦受冲突影响农村地区患有常见精神障碍的女性采用认知行为策略进行团体心理干预的有效性和成本效益:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Apr 26;18(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1905-8.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
The effectiveness, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for maltreated children and adolescents: an evidence synthesis.针对受虐待儿童和青少年的心理社会干预措施的有效性、可接受性和成本效益:证据综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Sep;20(69):1-508. doi: 10.3310/hta20690.
9
Psychological and social interventions for the prevention of mental disorders in people living in low- and middle-income countries affected by humanitarian crises.针对受人道主义危机影响的低收入和中等收入国家人群预防精神障碍的心理和社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 8;9(9):CD012417. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012417.pub2.
10
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.

引用本文的文献

1
Professional and service-user perspectives regarding the future of mental healthcare in Israel.关于以色列精神卫生保健未来的专业人士和服务使用者观点。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025 Aug 7;14(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13584-025-00710-7.
2
Models of practice and training in psychotherapy: cross-national perspectives from Italy and Canada.心理治疗的实践与培训模式:来自意大利和加拿大的跨国视角
Res Psychother. 2024 Mar 14;27(1):732. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2024.732.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the 7-item General Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) in an Italian coronary heart disease population.7 项广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)在意大利冠心病人群中的心理测量特性和测量不变性。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Aug 1;334:213-219. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.04.140. Epub 2023 May 5.
2
Unpacking trust: The Italian validation of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ).拆包信任:意大利版认识信任、不信任和轻信问卷(ETMCQ)的验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0280328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280328. eCollection 2023.
3
Adolescence in lockdown: The protective role of mentalizing and epistemic trust.
疫情下的青春期:心理化和认识信任的保护作用。
J Clin Psychol. 2023 Apr;79(4):969-984. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23453. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
4
Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations.2022 年健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS 2022)声明:健康经济评估报告的更新指南。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Jan 11;38(1):e13. doi: 10.1017/S0266462321001732.
5
Development and validation of a self-report measure of epistemic trust.一种认知信任自我报告测量方法的开发与验证
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0250264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250264. eCollection 2021.
6
Screening for depression in primary care with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9): A systematic review.用患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)在初级保健中筛查抑郁:系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jan 15;279:473-483. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.131. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
7
Treating medically unexplained symptoms via improving access to psychological therapy (IAPT): major limitations identified.通过改善心理治疗的可及性来治疗医学无法解释的症状(IAPT):确定了主要的局限性。
BMC Psychol. 2020 Feb 5;8(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-0380-2.
8
Mentalizing, Epistemic Trust and the Phenomenology of Psychotherapy.心理化、认识信任与心理治疗的现象学。
Psychopathology. 2019;52(2):94-103. doi: 10.1159/000501526. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
9
Prompt mental health care, the Norwegian version of IAPT: clinical outcomes and predictors of change in a multicenter cohort study.促进心理健康护理,挪威版 IAPT:多中心队列研究中的临床结果和变化预测因素。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 16;18(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1838-0.
10
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) - The Need for Radical Reform.改善心理治疗服务(IAPT)——需要彻底改革。
J Health Psychol. 2018 Aug;23(9):1136-1147. doi: 10.1177/1359105318755264. Epub 2018 Feb 2.