Robotic versus open surgery for simultaneous resection of rectal cancer and liver metastases: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes between robotic-assisted simultaneous resection and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer and liver metastases.

BACKGROUND

Open simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases is widely performed and the potential cure for eligible patients. However, the feasibility of robotic simultaneous resection of primary and secondary liver lesions has not been established as a treatment option for metastatic rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted at a hospital in China. Enrolling patients were aged from 18 to 75 years and diagnosed with surgically resectable metastatic rectal cancer (distal extension to ≤15 cm from the anal margin). Patients selected for simultaneous resection were randomly assigned to have robotic or open surgery at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of complications within 30 days after surgery. Secondary endpoints were bladder, sexual function, 3-year disease-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients were enrolled in this trial with 86 in the robotic group and 85 in the open group. As a result, patients in the robotic group demonstrated fewer complications within 30 days after surgery than those in the open group (31.4 vs. 57.6%, P =0.014) and no mortality seen in either group. Patients in the robotic group had less blood loss [mean (SD), 125.5 (38.3) vs. 211.6 (68.7) ml; P <0.001], faster bowel function recovery [mean (SD), 63.7 (27.4) vs. 93.8 (33.5) h P <0.001] and shorter hospital stay [mean (SD), 8.0 (2.2) vs. 10.7 (5.4) days; P <0.001] compared with those in the open group. The robotic group had a faster recovery of bladder and sexual function at 3 months after surgery than that of the open group. The 3-year disease-free survival rate (39.5 vs. 35.3%, P =0.739) and the 3-year overall survival rate (76.7 vs. 72.9%, P =0.712) were not statistically significant between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In our randomized clinical trial, robotic simultaneous resection treatment of patients with rectal cancer and liver metastases resulted in fewer surgical complications, and a faster recovery to those of open surgery. Oncological outcomes showed no significant difference between the two groups.