Olivera Ignacio, Pérez Carlos Grau, Lazarov Luis, Lopez Eduardo, Oddo Cristian, Dibarboure Hugo
Centro de Investigaciones Económicas, CINVE, Salud, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Salvador, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 6;23(1):1067. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10038-0.
Argentina currently uses a pentavalent vaccine containing diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whole cell), Haemophilus influenza type b and hepatitis B antigens, administered concomitantly with the inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) (DTwP-Hib-HB plus IPV) in its childhood vaccination schedule. However, hexavalent vaccines containing acellular pertussis antigens (DTaP-Hib-HB-IPV) and providing protection against the same diseases are also licensed, but are only available with a private prescription or for high-risk pre-term infants in the public health program. We analyzed the cost of switching from the current schedule to the alternative schedule with the hexavalent vaccine in Argentina, assuming similar levels of effectiveness.
The study population was infants ≤ 1 year of age born in Argentina from 2015 to 2019. The analysis considered adverse events, programmatic, logistic, and vaccine costs of both schemes from the societal perspective. The societal costs were disaggregated to summarize costs incurred in the public sector and with vaccination pre-term infants in the public sector. Costs were expressed in 2021 US Dollars (US$).
Although the cost of vaccines with the alternative scheme would be US$39.8 million (M) more than with the current scheme, these additional costs are in large part offset by fewer adverse event-associated costs and lower programmatic costs such that the overall cost of the alternative scheme would only be an additional US$3.6 M from the societal perspective. The additional cost associated with switching to the alternative scheme in the public sector and with the vaccination of pre-term infants in the public sector would be US$2.1 M and US$84,023, respectively.
The switch to an alternative scheme with the hexavalent vaccine in Argentina would result in marginally higher vaccine costs, which are mostly offset by the lower costs associated with improved logistics, fewer separate vaccines, and a reduction in adverse events.
阿根廷目前在其儿童疫苗接种计划中使用一种五价疫苗,该疫苗含有白喉、破伤风、百日咳(全细胞)、b型流感嗜血杆菌和乙型肝炎抗原,与灭活脊髓灰质炎疫苗(IPV)同时接种(DTwP-Hib-HB加IPV)。然而,含有无细胞百日咳抗原的六价疫苗(DTaP-Hib-HB-IPV)也已获得许可,可预防相同疾病,但仅凭私人处方提供,或在公共卫生项目中用于高危早产儿。我们分析了在阿根廷从当前接种计划转换为使用六价疫苗的替代接种计划的成本,假设有效性水平相似。
研究人群为2015年至2019年在阿根廷出生的1岁及以下婴儿。该分析从社会角度考虑了两种方案的不良事件、项目、后勤和疫苗成本。将社会成本进行分解,以总结公共部门产生的成本以及公共部门为早产儿接种疫苗的成本。成本以2021年美元(US$)表示。
尽管替代方案的疫苗成本比当前方案高出3980万美元(M),但这些额外成本在很大程度上被较少的不良事件相关成本和较低的项目成本所抵消,因此从社会角度来看,替代方案的总体成本仅额外增加360万美元。在公共部门转向替代方案以及为公共部门的早产儿接种疫苗的额外成本分别为210万美元和84,023美元。
在阿根廷转向使用六价疫苗的替代方案将导致疫苗成本略有增加,这在很大程度上被物流改善、疫苗种类减少和不良事件减少带来的较低成本所抵消。