Suppr超能文献

低剂量与高剂量药物涂层球囊治疗症状性股腘动脉疾病:PROSPECT MONSTER 研究结果。

Low-Dose vs High-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon for Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: The PROSPECT MONSTER Study Outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Bay Medical Center, Urayasu, Japan; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Metabolic Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov 13;16(21):2655-2665. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.08.022. Epub 2023 Oct 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials have shown comparable outcomes between second-generation low-dose drug-coated balloons (LD-DCBs) and first-generation high-dose drug-coated balloons (HD-DCBs); but the trial patients had low clinical complexity, and there were no comparisons in medically complex populations.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between an LD-DCB (Ranger; 2.0 μg/mm) and an HD-DCB (IN.PACT; 3.5 μg/mm) in patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease.

METHODS

PROSPECT MONSTER (Prospective Comparison of Second-Generation Low-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon With High-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon) was a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized trial that prospectively collected data from 581 patients who underwent endovascular therapy with the LD-DCB (n = 370) or the HD-DCB (n = 211) for symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease (Rutherford classes 2-5). The primary outcome was the 1-year primary patency of the LD-DCB in comparison with that of the HD-DCB, as evaluated using propensity score matching. The incidence of impaired flow after drug-coated balloon application was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Propensity score matching extracted 163 pairs (358 and 163 patients in the LD-DCB and HD-DCB groups, respectively), with no significant intergroup difference in baseline characteristics. The 1-year primary patency rates in the matched population were similar between the LD-DCB and HD-DCB groups (87.0% [95% CI: 82.5%-91.7%] vs 81.3% [95% CI: 74.8%-88.5%]; HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.55-1.59; P = 0.79), as was the incidence of impaired flow (13.6% vs 9.8%; OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 0.78-2.73; P = 0.24). No baseline characteristics had any significant interaction effects on the association of the LD-DCB vs the HD-DCB and 1-year restenosis risk.

CONCLUSIONS

LD-DCBs demonstrate efficacy and safety comparable with HD-DCBs in patients with complex clinical backgrounds, suggesting that drug-coated balloon treatment using a lower dose may be possible.

摘要

背景

随机试验表明,第二代低剂量药物涂层球囊(LD-DCB)与第一代高剂量药物涂层球囊(HD-DCB)的疗效相当;但试验患者的临床复杂性较低,且在复杂的医学人群中没有比较。

目的

本研究旨在比较在有症状的股腘动脉疾病患者中,使用 LD-DCB(Ranger;2.0μg/mm)和 HD-DCB(IN.PACT;3.5μg/mm)的结果。

方法

PROSPECT MONSTER(第二代低剂量药物涂层球囊与高剂量药物涂层球囊的前瞻性比较)是一项前瞻性、多中心、非随机试验,前瞻性地收集了 581 例接受 LD-DCB(n=370)或 HD-DCB(n=211)治疗有症状的股腘动脉疾病(Rutherford 分级 2-5)的患者的数据。主要结局是使用倾向评分匹配评估 LD-DCB 的 1 年原发性通畅率与 HD-DCB 的比较。还评估了药物涂层球囊应用后血流受损的发生率。

结果

倾向评分匹配提取了 163 对(LD-DCB 组和 HD-DCB 组分别为 358 例和 163 例),两组间基线特征无显著差异。匹配人群中,LD-DCB 组和 HD-DCB 组的 1 年原发性通畅率相似(87.0%[95%CI:82.5%-91.7%] vs 81.3%[95%CI:74.8%-88.5%];HR:0.93;95%CI:0.55-1.59;P=0.79),血流受损的发生率也相似(13.6% vs 9.8%;OR:1.46;95%CI:0.78-2.73;P=0.24)。没有基线特征对 LD-DCB 与 HD-DCB 的关联和 1 年再狭窄风险有任何显著的交互作用。

结论

在具有复杂临床背景的患者中,LD-DCB 显示出与 HD-DCB 相当的疗效和安全性,这表明使用较低剂量的药物涂层球囊治疗可能是可行的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验