• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

HEART-score 在胸痛患者中可以简化而不损失鉴别能力 - 引入 HET-score。

HEART-score can be simplified without loss of discriminatory power in patients with chest pain - Introducing the HET-score.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Dec;74:104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.09.037. Epub 2023 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2023.09.037
PMID:37804822
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The History, Electrocardiogram (ECG), Age, Risk factors and Troponin, (HEART) score is useful for early risk stratification in chest pain patients. The aim was to validate previous findings that a simplified score using history, ECG and troponin (HET-score) has similar ability to stratify risk.

METHODS

Patients presenting with chest pain with duration of ≥10 min and an onset of last episode ≤12 h but without ST-segment elevation on ECG at 6 emergency departments were eligible for inclusion. The HEART-score and the simplified HET-score were calculated. The endpoint was a composite of myocardial infarction (MI) as index diagnosis, readmission due to new MI or death within 30 days.

RESULTS

HEART-score identified 32% as low risk (0-2p), 47% as intermediate risk (3-5p), and 20% as high risk (6-10p) patients. The endpoint occurred in 0.5%, 7.3% and 35.7%, respectively. HET-score identified 39%, 42% and 19% as low- (0p), intermediate- (1-2p) and high-risk (3-6p) patients, with the endpoint occurring in 0.6%, 6.2% and 43.2%, respectively. When all variables included in the HEART-score were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis, only History (OR, CI [95%]): 2.97(2.16-4.09), ECG (1.61[1.14-2.28]) and troponin level (5.21[3.91-6.95]) were significantly associated with cardiovascular events. When HEART- and HET-score were compared in a ROC-analysis, HET-score had a significantly larger AUC (0.887 vs 0.853, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with HEART-score, HET-score is simpler and appears to have similar ability to discriminate between chest pain patients with and without cardiovascular event.

摘要

背景

历史、心电图(ECG)、年龄、危险因素和肌钙蛋白(HEART)评分可用于胸痛患者的早期风险分层。目的是验证之前的发现,即使用病史、心电图和肌钙蛋白的简化评分(HET 评分)具有相似的分层风险能力。

方法

在 6 个急诊科,符合纳入标准的胸痛患者为胸痛持续时间≥10 分钟且最后一次发作时间≤12 小时,但心电图无 ST 段抬高。计算 HEART 评分和简化 HET 评分。终点是心肌梗死(MI)作为指标诊断、因新发 MI 再入院或 30 天内死亡的复合终点。

结果

HEART 评分将 32%的患者评为低危(0-2 分),47%的患者评为中危(3-5 分),20%的患者评为高危(6-10 分)。终点发生率分别为 0.5%、7.3%和 35.7%。HET 评分将 39%、42%和 19%的患者评为低危(0 分)、中危(1-2 分)和高危(3-6 分),终点发生率分别为 0.6%、6.2%和 43.2%。当 HEART 评分中包含的所有变量都包含在多变量逻辑回归分析中时,只有病史(OR,CI [95%]):2.97(2.16-4.09)、心电图(1.61[1.14-2.28])和肌钙蛋白水平(5.21[3.91-6.95])与心血管事件显著相关。当在 ROC 分析中比较 HEART 和 HET 评分时,HET 评分的 AUC 显著更大(0.887 对 0.853,p<0.001)。

结论

与 HEART 评分相比,HET 评分更简单,似乎具有相似的能力来区分有和无心血管事件的胸痛患者。

相似文献

1
HEART-score can be simplified without loss of discriminatory power in patients with chest pain - Introducing the HET-score.HEART-score 在胸痛患者中可以简化而不损失鉴别能力 - 引入 HET-score。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Dec;74:104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.09.037. Epub 2023 Oct 1.
2
Prehospital Modified HEART Score Predictive of 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events.院前改良HEART评分对30天不良心脏事件的预测作用
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Feb;33(1):58-62. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17007154. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
3
Efficacy of HEAR and HEART score to rule out major adverse cardiac events in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: study protocol of the eCARE stepped-wedge randomised control trial.HEAR 和 HEART 评分对急诊科胸痛患者排除主要不良心脏事件的疗效:eCARE 逐步随机对照试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 6;12(12):e066953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066953.
4
[Development and prospective validation of an ischemic risk score for acute chest pain patients with normal high-sensitivity troponin I levels and without obvious ST-segment deviation].[高敏肌钙蛋白I水平正常且无明显ST段偏移的急性胸痛患者缺血风险评分的开发与前瞻性验证]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 24;46(2):131-136. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2018.02.012.
5
An end-user's guide to the HEART score and pathway.《HEART评分与流程的终端用户指南》
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;35(9):1350-1355. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.047. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
6
HEART score: a simple and useful tool that may lower the proportion of chest pain patients who are admitted.HEART评分:一种简单且有用的工具,可能会降低胸痛患者的住院比例。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2013 Sep;12(3):127-31. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3182953359.
7
HEART Score Risk Stratification of Low-Risk Chest Pain Patients in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急诊低危胸痛患者 HEART 评分风险分层:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;74(2):187-203. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.12.010. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
8
Safely Identifying Emergency Department Patients With Acute Chest Pain for Early Discharge.安全识别急诊科急性胸痛患者以实现早期出院。
Circulation. 2018 Nov 27;138(22):2456-2468. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036528.
9
Performance analysis considering endpoints for three accelerated diagnostic protocols for chest pain.考虑终点的三种胸痛加速诊断方案的性能分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb;64:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.11.020. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
10
New risk score for patients with acute chest pain, non-ST-segment deviation, and normal troponin concentrations: a comparison with the TIMI risk score.急性胸痛、非ST段偏移且肌钙蛋白浓度正常患者的新风险评分:与TIMI风险评分的比较
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 2;46(3):443-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.037.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving chest pain risk assessment: validation of HEART, TIMI, GRACE, EDACS-ADP, and HET for MACE prediction in the emergency department.改善胸痛风险评估:验证HEART、TIMI、GRACE、EDACS-ADP和HET在急诊科预测主要不良心血管事件(MACE)中的作用。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Aug 22;25(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01327-4.
2
Performance of computerized self-reported medical history taking and HEAR score for safe early rule-out of cardiac events in acute chest pain patients: the CLEOS-CPDS prospective cohort study.计算机化自我报告病史采集及HEAR评分在急性胸痛患者心脏事件安全早期排除中的应用:CLEOS-CPDS前瞻性队列研究
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024 Nov 12;6(1):104-114. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae087. eCollection 2025 Jan.