Suppr超能文献

某三级医疗中心过去5年子宫切除术趋势分析。

Analysis of Hysterectomy Trends in the Last 5 Years at a Tertiary Center.

作者信息

Kantarci Sercan, İnan Abdurrahman Hamdi, Töz Emrah, Bolukbasi Mehmet, Kanmaz Ahkam Göksel

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2022 Sep 19;12(3):135-140. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_30_22. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess trends by evaluating the types and complications of hysterectomies performed for benign gynecological reasons at our clinic, which is one of the largest hospitals in Turkey.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hysterectomies performed for benign reasons at our gynecology and obstetrics clinic between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed and included in the analysis. Of the 4288 patients who had undergone hysterectomy, 888 patients were excluded some reasons. The data of the remaining 3400 patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

For the 3400 patients, the hysterectomy methods performed were as follows: Total Abdominal Hysterectomy (TAH (60%, = 2055), Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (TLH), (27%, = 948), Vaginal Hysterectomy (VH), (8.9%, = 302), Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy (L / S > LT). (1.4%, = 49), Robotic hysterectomy (RH), (1%, = 33), and Subtotal hysterectomy (SH), (0.4%, = 13). The length of hospital stay was statistically significantly lower in the TLH group than in the TAH group ( < 0.05). A statistically significant and moderate correlation was noted between the length of hospital stay and the duration of operation (r: 0.68 = 0.00).

CONCLUSION

The ratio of TLH group among hysterectomy modalities has increased over the years. There are many factors that affect the surgeon's decision in determining the hysterectomy method. TLH is the first option in patients who are not suitable for vaginal hysterectomy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过评估在我们诊所(土耳其最大的医院之一)因良性妇科原因进行的子宫切除术的类型和并发症来评估趋势。

材料与方法

回顾性分析2015年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间在我们妇产科诊所因良性原因进行的子宫切除术,并纳入分析。在4288例行子宫切除术的患者中,因某些原因排除了888例患者。对其余3400例患者的数据进行了分析。

结果

对于这3400例患者,所采用的子宫切除方法如下:经腹全子宫切除术(TAH,60%,n = 2055)、全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH,27%,n = 948)、经阴道子宫切除术(VH,8.9%,n = 302)、腹腔镜中转开腹(L / S > LT,1.4%,n = 49)、机器人辅助子宫切除术(RH,1%,n = 33)和次全子宫切除术(SH,0.4%,n = 13)。TLH组的住院时间在统计学上显著低于TAH组(P < 0.05)。住院时间与手术时间之间存在统计学上显著的中度相关性(r:0.68,P = 0.00)。

结论

多年来,TLH组在子宫切除方式中的比例有所增加。在确定子宫切除方法时,有许多因素会影响外科医生的决策。对于不适合经阴道子宫切除术的患者,TLH是首选。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1380/10553599/2c015610b8f2/GMIT-12-135-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验