Stark Brett, Nagle Shea A, Hunter Adam, Charlton Brittany M, Katz-Wise Sabra L
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Int J Transgend Health. 2021 Mar 18;22(4):425-439. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2021.1896410. eCollection 2021.
Professional societies state that Transgender and gender expansive (TGE) adolescents and their families should be counseled about future family building options prior to initiating gender affirming therapy. While emerging data show that TGE adolescents have diverse desires regarding future family building, little is known regarding how these preferences are developed in a larger ecological context.
The current study used Ecological Systems Theory as a framework to describe the family building attitudes of TGE adolescents, their caregivers, and their siblings.
Participants were recruited from community-based venues in the New England region of the U.S. to participate in the TTFN Project, a longitudinal community-based mixed methods study. The sample for the current study included 84 family members from 30 families (30 TGE adolescents, 11 siblings, 44 caregivers). All participants completed a semi-structured qualitative interview about family building attitudes and desires for TGE and cisgender adolescents at two waves across 6-8 months. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a combination of immersion/crystallization, thematic analysis, and template organizing style approaches. The Transgender Youth Fertility Attitudes Questionnaire (TYFAQ) was employed to quantitatively describe the family building attitudes of TGE adolescents and their families.
Eight themes corresponding to the levels of the ecological systems model - individual-level (perceived reproductive potential, reproductive identity), family-level (communication about family building, familial experiences and expectations), community-level (community support and role models; community expectations and norms), and societal/institutional-level (medicalization of family building, external sociopolitical factors) - were developed from the interviews. Results from the TYFAQ indicated that compared to cisgender adolescents, TGE adolescents were less likely to value having biological children and more likely to consider adoption in comparison to their cisgender siblings.
Findings emphasize the importance of using Ecological Systems Theory to understand the family building attitudes and desires of TGE adolescents and their families.
专业协会指出,在开始性别肯定治疗之前,应该为跨性别和性别扩展(TGE)青少年及其家庭提供有关未来组建家庭选择的咨询。虽然新出现的数据表明,TGE青少年对未来组建家庭有不同的愿望,但对于这些偏好是如何在更广泛的生态背景下形成的,人们知之甚少。
本研究以生态系统理论为框架,描述TGE青少年、他们的照顾者及其兄弟姐妹对组建家庭的态度。
参与者从美国新英格兰地区的社区场所招募,参与TTFN项目,这是一项基于社区的纵向混合方法研究。本研究的样本包括来自30个家庭的84名家庭成员(30名TGE青少年、11名兄弟姐妹、44名照顾者)。所有参与者在6至8个月的两个阶段完成了关于TGE青少年和顺性别青少年组建家庭态度和愿望的半结构化定性访谈。访谈记录采用沉浸/结晶、主题分析和模板组织风格方法相结合的方式进行分析。使用跨性别青少年生育态度问卷(TYFAQ)对TGE青少年及其家庭的组建家庭态度进行定量描述。
从访谈中得出了与生态系统模型层次相对应的八个主题——个人层面(感知的生育潜力、生殖身份)、家庭层面(关于组建家庭的沟通、家庭经历和期望)、社区层面(社区支持和榜样;社区期望和规范)以及社会/机构层面(组建家庭的医学化、外部社会政治因素)。TYFAQ的结果表明,与顺性别青少年相比,TGE青少年不太看重生育亲生孩子,与他们的顺性别兄弟姐妹相比,更有可能考虑收养。
研究结果强调了运用生态系统理论来理解TGE青少年及其家庭组建家庭态度和愿望的重要性。