Suppr超能文献

奥密克戎BA.4和BA.5占主导时期新冠疫苗接种对住院的保护作用:基于法国国家卫生数据系统的全国性病例对照研究

Protection of COVID-19 Vaccination Against Hospitalization During the Era of Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 Predominance: A Nationwide Case-Control Study Based on the French National Health Data System.

作者信息

Semenzato Laura, Botton Jérémie, Le Vu Stéphane, Jabagi Marie-Joëlle, Cuenot François, Drouin Jérôme, Dray-Spira Rosemary, Weill Alain, Zureik Mahmoud

机构信息

EPI-PHARE Scientific Interest Group in Epidemiology of Health Products from the French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products and the French National Health Insurance, Saint-Denis, France.

Faculty of Pharmacy, Paris-Saclay University, Orsay, France.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Sep 8;10(10):ofad460. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad460. eCollection 2023 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Knowing the duration of effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) booster doses is essential to providing decision-makers with scientific arguments about the frequency of subsequent injections. We estimated the level of protection against COVID-19-related hospitalizations (Omicron BA.4-BA.5) over time after vaccination, accounting for breakthrough infections.

METHODS

In this nationwide case-control study, all cases of hospitalizations for COVID-19 identified in the comprehensive French National Health Data System between June 1, 2022, and October 15, 2022, were matched with up to 10 controls by year of birth, sex, department, and an individual COVID-19 hospitalization risk score. Conditional logistic regressions were used to estimate the level of protection against COVID-19-related hospitalizations conferred by primary and booster vaccination, accounting for history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

RESULTS

A total of 38 839 cases were matched to 377 653 controls; 19.2% and 9.9% were unvaccinated, respectively, while 68.2% and 77.7% had received ≥1 booster dose. Protection provided by primary vaccination reached 45% (95% CI, 42%-47%). The incremental effectiveness of booster doses ranged from 69% (95% CI, 67%-71%; ≤2 months) to 22% (95% CI, 19%-25%; ≥6 months). Specifically, the second booster provided an additional protection compared with the first ranging from 61% (95% CI, 59%-64%; ≤2 months) to 7% (95% CI, 2%-13%; ≥4 months). Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection conferred a strong, long-lasting protection (51% ≥20 months). There was no incremental effectiveness of a second booster among individuals infected since the first booster.

CONCLUSIONS

In the era of Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 predominance, primary vaccination still conferred protection against COVID-19 hospitalization, while booster doses provided an additional time-limited protection. The second booster had no additional protection in case of infection since the first booster.

摘要

背景

了解2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)加强针的有效持续时间,对于向决策者提供关于后续注射频率的科学依据至关重要。我们估计了接种疫苗后不同时间对COVID-19相关住院(奥密克戎BA.4-BA.5)的防护水平,并考虑了突破性感染情况。

方法

在这项全国性病例对照研究中,2022年6月1日至2022年10月15日期间在法国国家卫生数据综合系统中识别出的所有COVID-19住院病例,按出生年份、性别、部门和个体COVID-19住院风险评分与最多10名对照进行匹配。采用条件逻辑回归来估计初次接种和加强接种对COVID-19相关住院的防护水平,并考虑严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染史。

结果

共38839例病例与377653名对照匹配;未接种疫苗的分别占19.2%和9.9%,而接受≥1剂加强针的分别占68.2%和77.7%。初次接种提供的防护率达45%(95%CI,42%-47%)。加强针的增效效果从69%(95%CI,67%-71%;≤2个月)到22%(95%CI,19%-25%;≥6个月)不等。具体而言,与第一剂加强针相比,第二剂加强针提供的额外防护从61%(95%CI,59%-64%;≤2个月)到7%(95%CI,2%-13%;≥4个月)不等。既往SARS-CoV-2感染可提供强大且持久的防护(51%≥20个月)。在首次接种加强针后感染的个体中,第二剂加强针没有增效作用。

结论

在奥密克戎BA.4和BA.5占主导的时代,初次接种仍可预防COVID-19住院,而加强针提供了额外的限时防护。在首次接种加强针后感染的情况下,第二剂加强针没有额外防护作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b28a/10551849/394d3fa6dc1a/ofad460f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验