• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能在学术界的影响:土耳其学者对ChatGPT的看法。

The impact of Artificial Intelligence in academia: Views of Turkish academics on ChatGPT.

作者信息

Livberber Tuba, Ayvaz Süheyla

机构信息

Department of Journalism, Faculty of Communication, University of Akdeniz, Antalya, Turkey.

Department of Advertising, Faculty of Communication, University of Selcuk, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Sep 1;9(9):e19688. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19688. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19688
PMID:37809772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10558923/
Abstract

In the past decade, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning technologies have become increasingly prevalent in the academic world. This growing trend has led to debates about the impact of these technologies on academia. The purpose of this article is to examine the impact of ChatGPT, an AI and machine learning technology, in the academic field and to determine academics' perceptions of it. To achieve this goal, in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 academics, and their views on the subject were analyzed. It is seen that academics believe that ChatGPT will play a helpful role as a tool in scientific research and educational processes and can serve as an inspiration for new topics and research areas. Despite these advantages, academics also have ethical concerns, such as plagiarism and misinformation. The study found that ChatGPT is viewed positively as a useful tool in scientific research and education, but ethical concerns such as plagiarism and misinformation need to be addressed.

摘要

在过去十年中,人工智能(AI)和机器学习技术在学术界越来越普遍。这种不断增长的趋势引发了关于这些技术对学术界影响的辩论。本文的目的是研究人工智能和机器学习技术ChatGPT在学术领域的影响,并确定学者们对它的看法。为了实现这一目标,对10位学者进行了深入访谈,并分析了他们对该主题的看法。可以看出,学者们认为ChatGPT将在科学研究和教育过程中作为一种工具发挥有益作用,并可以为新的主题和研究领域提供灵感。尽管有这些优点,学者们也存在伦理方面的担忧,如抄袭和错误信息。研究发现,ChatGPT在科学研究和教育中被视为一种有用的工具,但抄袭和错误信息等伦理问题需要得到解决。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f8/10558923/4f5d145675dc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f8/10558923/4f5d145675dc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f8/10558923/4f5d145675dc/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of Artificial Intelligence in academia: Views of Turkish academics on ChatGPT.人工智能在学术界的影响:土耳其学者对ChatGPT的看法。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 1;9(9):e19688. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19688. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
The relationship between personal and professional goals and emotional state in academia: a study on unethical use of artificial intelligence.学术界个人目标与职业目标和情绪状态之间的关系:一项关于人工智能不道德使用的研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 27;15:1363174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1363174. eCollection 2024.
3
ChatGPT: ethical concerns and challenges in academics and research.ChatGPT:学术和研究中的伦理问题与挑战。
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2023 Sep 30;17(9):1292-1299. doi: 10.3855/jidc.18738.
4
Usability and Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots (ChatGPT) for Health Sciences Students: Protocol for a Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.人工智能聊天机器人(ChatGPT)对健康科学专业学生的可用性和有效性:一项交叉随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 24;12:e51873. doi: 10.2196/51873.
5
Extended TAM based acceptance of AI-Powered ChatGPT for supporting metacognitive self-regulated learning in education: A mixed-methods study.基于扩展技术接受模型的人工智能驱动的ChatGPT在教育中支持元认知自我调节学习的接受度:一项混合方法研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 9;10(8):e29317. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29317. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
6
From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing.从人类写作到人工智能生成的文本:审视ChatGPT在学术写作中的前景与潜在威胁。
Biol Sport. 2023 Apr;40(2):615-622. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
7
ChatGPT for Academic Purposes: Survey Among Undergraduate Healthcare Students in Malaysia.用于学术目的的ChatGPT:马来西亚本科医学生的调查
Cureus. 2024 Jan 27;16(1):e53032. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53032. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
Perspectives and experiences of health sciences academics regarding ChatGPT: A qualitative study.健康科学学者对ChatGPT的看法与体验:一项定性研究
Med Teach. 2025 Mar;47(3):550-559. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2413425. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
9
No worries with ChatGPT: building bridges between artificial intelligence and education with critical thinking soft skills.使用 ChatGPT 无需担心:用批判性思维等软技能在人工智能和教育之间架起桥梁。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Aug 28;45(3):e602-e603. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad049.
10
ChatGPT in Clinical Medicine, Urology and Academia: A Review.ChatGPT 在临床医学、泌尿科和学术界的应用:综述
Arch Esp Urol. 2024 Aug;77(7):708-717. doi: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247707.99.

引用本文的文献

1
Fishing reviewing: A threat to research integrity and credibility.钓鱼式评审:对研究诚信和可信度的一种威胁。
World J Methodol. 2025 Sep 20;15(3):98795. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i3.98795.
2
Generative AI and academic scientists in US universities: Perception, experience, and adoption intentions.美国大学中的生成式人工智能与学术科学家:认知、体验及采用意愿
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 28;20(8):e0330416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330416. eCollection 2025.
3
Embracing AI in academia: A mixed methods study of nursing students' and educators' perspectives on using ChatGPT.

本文引用的文献

1
Chatbots, ChatGPT, and Scholarly Manuscripts: WAME Recommendations on ChatGPT and Chatbots in relation to scholarly publications.聊天机器人、ChatGPT与学术手稿:世界医学编辑协会关于ChatGPT和聊天机器人在学术出版方面的建议
Natl Med J India. 2023 Jan-Feb;36(1):1-4. doi: 10.25259/NMJI_365_23.
2
ChatGPT for Sample-Size Calculation in Sports Medicine and Exercise Sciences: A Cautionary Note.ChatGPT 在运动医学和运动科学样本量计算中的应用:警示。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2023 Aug 3;18(10):1219-1223. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2023-0109. Print 2023 Oct 1.
3
From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing.
学术界对人工智能的接纳:一项关于护理专业学生和教育工作者对使用ChatGPT看法的混合方法研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 17;20(7):e0327981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327981. eCollection 2025.
4
Analytical methods in studying cell force sensing: principles, current technologies and perspectives.细胞力传感研究中的分析方法:原理、当前技术及展望
Regen Biomater. 2025 Mar 20;12:rbaf007. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbaf007. eCollection 2025.
5
The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing and publication: Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences (IJBMS) policy.人工智能(AI)对学术写作与发表的影响:《伊朗基础医学科学杂志》(IJBMS)政策
Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2025;28(1):1-2. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2025.25229.
6
Performance of ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 on U.S. dental examinations: the INBDE, ADAT, and DAT.ChatGPT 3.5和4在美国牙科考试中的表现:国际牙科执照考试(INBDE)、高级牙科能力倾向测试(ADAT)和牙科入学考试(DAT)
Imaging Sci Dent. 2024 Sep;54(3):271-275. doi: 10.5624/isd.20240037. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
7
Artificial intelligence in scientific writing.科学写作中的人工智能。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2024 Sep 2;142(5):e20241425. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2024.1425.26062024.
8
Expectation management in AI: A framework for understanding stakeholder trust and acceptance of artificial intelligence systems.人工智能中的期望管理:理解利益相关者对人工智能系统信任与接受度的框架。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 25;10(7):e28562. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28562. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
9
Artificial intelligence in academic writing and clinical pharmacy education: consequences and opportunities.人工智能在学术写作和临床药学教育中的应用:影响与机遇。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Jun;46(3):751-754. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01705-1. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
从人类写作到人工智能生成的文本:审视ChatGPT在学术写作中的前景与潜在威胁。
Biol Sport. 2023 Apr;40(2):615-622. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
4
To ChatGPT or not to ChatGPT? The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Academic Publishing.是选择ChatGPT还是不选择ChatGPT?人工智能对学术出版的影响。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2023 Apr 1;42(4):275. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003852. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
5
Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing.使用ChatGPT生成学术内容:医学出版面临的伦理挑战。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Mar;5(3):e105-e106. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00019-5. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
6
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author.ChatGPT 很有趣,但不是作者。
Science. 2023 Jan 27;379(6630):313. doi: 10.1126/science.adg7879. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
7
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove.研究论文将ChatGPT列为作者:许多科学家表示反对。
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7945):620-621. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z.
8
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Programs on Writing Scientific Research.人工智能(AI)程序对撰写科研论文的影响。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2023 Mar;51(3):459-460. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03140-1. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
9
Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse?护理教育中的开放人工智能平台:学术进步的工具还是滥用的手段?
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Jan;66:103537. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103537. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
10
Could AI help you to write your next paper?人工智能能帮你撰写下一篇论文吗?
Nature. 2022 Nov;611(7934):192-193. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-03479-w.