Teixeira Iara G, Verzola Marcio R, Filipini Richard E, Speretta Guilherme F
Post-Graduate Program in Neurosciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Department of Physiological Sciences, Biological Sciences Centre, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Front Physiol. 2023 Sep 21;14:1215006. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1215006. eCollection 2023.
During firefighting, physical and cognitive demands increase. However, the stress inherent to these events can decrease cognitive performance and increase the risk of cardiovascular events in firefighters. Thus, this crossover study aimed to evaluate the effects of a firefighting Simulation on cognitive performance and vascular and autonomic functions in military firefighters. Sixteen firefighters (37.8 ± 5.6 years) underwent anthropometry, mental health status, and sleep quality assessments. They randomly performed two interventions, Simulation (Firefighting tasks; 10.0 ± 1.1 min) and Control (rest for 10 min), on different days. After both interventions, cognitive performance was assessed using the Stroop Test, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, and Trail Making Test. Then, the vascular function was assessed using ultrasonography through the carotid artery reactivity to the cold pressor test. The arterial pressure, heart rate, and cardiac intervals were recorded before interventions. The cardiac intervals were also measured during the cold pressor test. Student's t-test and Wilcoxon were used for comparisons between Control and Simulation and the analysis of variance for repeated measures was used for comparison over time during the cold pressor test. A significance level of < 0.05 was adopted. Although the mean and maximum heart rate were higher before the Simulation ( < 0.0001), all the heart rate variability parameters ( > 0.05) and mean arterial pressure ( > 0.3795) were similar before the interventions. After Simulation, the cognitive performance was similar to Control ( > 0.05), except for the improvement in Stroop Test part B ( < 0.0001). After Simulation, carotid artery reactivity was attenuated ( < 0.0010). During the cold pressor test, the high-frequency band of the heart rate variability was lower after the Simulation ( < 0.0104). Although firefighting Simulation did not substantially change cognitive performance, the lower carotid artery reactivity and parasympathetic modulation to the heart during the cold pressor test may contribute to greater vulnerability to cardiovascular events in firefighters on duty.
在灭火过程中,身体和认知需求会增加。然而,这些事件所固有的压力会降低认知表现,并增加消防员发生心血管事件的风险。因此,这项交叉研究旨在评估灭火模拟对军事消防员认知表现以及血管和自主神经功能的影响。16名消防员(37.8±5.6岁)接受了人体测量、心理健康状况和睡眠质量评估。他们在不同日期随机进行了两项干预,即模拟(灭火任务;10.0±1.1分钟)和对照(休息10分钟)。两项干预后,使用斯特鲁普测验、听觉加算测验和连线测验评估认知表现。然后,通过超声检查颈动脉对冷加压试验的反应性来评估血管功能。在干预前记录动脉压、心率和心动周期。在冷加压试验期间也测量心动周期。采用学生t检验和威尔科克森检验进行对照与模拟之间的比较,并在冷加压试验期间采用重复测量方差分析进行随时间的比较。采用显著性水平<0.05。尽管模拟前的平均心率和最大心率较高(<0.0001),但所有心率变异性参数(>0.05)和平均动脉压(>0.3795)在干预前相似。模拟后,认知表现与对照相似(>0.05),但斯特鲁普测验B部分有所改善(<0.0001)。模拟后,颈动脉反应性减弱(<0.0010)。在冷加压试验期间,模拟后的心率变异性高频段较低(<0.0104)。尽管灭火模拟并未显著改变认知表现,但冷加压试验期间较低的颈动脉反应性和心脏副交感神经调节可能导致执勤消防员更容易发生心血管事件。