Zare Sajad, Hemmatjo Rasoul, Allahyari Teimour, Hajaghazadeh Mohammad, Hajivandi Abdollah, Aghabeigi Mandana, Kazemi Reza
a Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health , Kerman University of Medical Sciences , Kerman , Iran.
b Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health , Urmia University of Medical Sciences , Urmia , Iran.
Ergonomics. 2018 Oct;61(10):1334-1344. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1484524. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
This study examined the impact of various types of firefighting activities on firefighters' physiological responses and cognitive function. Each firefighter was engaged in three conditions: (1) Live-fire activities (LFA), (2) Typical firefighting activities (TFA), and (3) Rescue operations at height (ROH). The effects of various types of firefighting activities on the physiological responses and cognitive function were evaluated by heart rate (HR), temporal artery temperature (TT), and the correct response (CR) on a cognitive test. The results indicated that, compared to the baseline, physiological response increased, while information processing performance decreased after the activity. Furthermore, HR and TT were significantly lower at the end of the firefighting activity in the LFA (149.33 bpm; 38.08 °C) compared with the TFA (152.22 bpm; 38.17 °C) and ROH (159.28 bpm; 38.24 °C) conditions. Also, CR was significantly higher at the end of the activity in the LFA and TFA compared with the ROH condition. The results showed that rescue at height was more intensive than the other firefighting tasks in decreasing physiological and cognitive function capacity after the experiment. Practitioner Summary: We assumed that various types of firefighting activities would have different effects on physiological and cognitive functions during firefighting activities. The Findings suggest that rescue at height operations, performed without the use of special protective equipment, was more influential than other firefighting duties in changing firefighters' physiological and cognitive capacity. Abbreviations: CR: correct response; LFA: live-fire activities; TFA: typical firefighting activities; ROH: rescue operations at height; HR: heart rate; TT: temporal artery tempearture; PASAT: pased auditory serila addition teat; FPC: firefighting protective clothing.
本研究考察了各类灭火活动对消防员生理反应和认知功能的影响。每位消防员参与三种情境:(1)实火活动(LFA),(2)典型灭火活动(TFA),以及(3)高空救援行动(ROH)。通过心率(HR)、颞动脉温度(TT)以及认知测试中的正确反应(CR)来评估各类灭火活动对生理反应和认知功能的影响。结果表明,与基线相比,活动后生理反应增强,而信息处理能力下降。此外,与TFA(152.22次/分钟;38.17°C)和ROH(159.28次/分钟;38.24°C)情境相比,LFA灭火活动结束时的HR和TT显著更低。而且,与ROH情境相比,LFA和TFA活动结束时的CR显著更高。结果显示,实验后高空救援行动在降低生理和认知功能能力方面比其他灭火任务更为剧烈。从业者总结:我们假设各类灭火活动在灭火过程中对生理和认知功能会有不同影响。研究结果表明,在不使用特殊防护装备的情况下进行的高空救援行动,在改变消防员生理和认知能力方面比其他灭火职责更具影响力。缩写:CR:正确反应;LFA:实火活动;TFA:典型灭火活动;ROH:高空救援行动;HR:心率;TT:颞动脉温度;PASAT:听觉连续加法测试;FPC:消防防护服