Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University.
Department of Strategy and Management, Norwegian School of Economics.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Jul;19(4):624-639. doi: 10.1177/17456916231190395. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
Polarization has been rising in the United States of America for the past few decades and now poses a significant-and growing-public-health risk. One of the signature features of the American response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been the degree to which perceptions of risk and willingness to follow public-health recommendations have been politically polarized. Although COVID-19 has proven more lethal than any war or public-health crisis in American history, the deadly consequences of the pandemic were exacerbated by polarization. We review research detailing how every phase of the COVID-19 pandemic has been polarized, including judgments of risk, spatial distancing, mask wearing, and vaccination. We describe the role of political ideology, partisan identity, leadership, misinformation, and mass communication in this public-health crisis. We then assess the overall impact of polarization on infections, illness, and mortality during the pandemic; offer a psychological analysis of key policy questions; and identify a set of future research questions for scholars and policy experts. Our analysis suggests that the catastrophic death toll in the United States was largely preventable and due, in large part, to the polarization of the pandemic. Finally, we discuss implications for public policy to help avoid the same deadly mistakes in future public-health crises.
几十年来,美国的极化现象一直在加剧,现在它构成了一个重大的——而且日益严重的——公共卫生风险。美国对 COVID-19 大流行的应对措施的一个显著特征是,对风险的看法和遵守公共卫生建议的意愿在政治上存在严重分歧。尽管 COVID-19 比美国历史上任何一场战争或公共卫生危机都更致命,但这场大流行的致命后果因极化而加剧。我们回顾了详细说明 COVID-19 大流行的每一个阶段如何两极分化的研究,包括对风险的判断、空间距离、戴口罩和接种疫苗。我们描述了政治意识形态、党派身份、领导层、错误信息和大众传播在这场公共卫生危机中的作用。然后,我们评估了极化对大流行期间感染、疾病和死亡率的总体影响;对关键政策问题进行了心理学分析;并为学者和政策专家确定了一系列未来的研究问题。我们的分析表明,美国灾难性的死亡人数在很大程度上是可以预防的,这在很大程度上是由于大流行的两极化。最后,我们讨论了公共政策的影响,以帮助避免未来公共卫生危机中出现同样致命的错误。