Suppr超能文献

在流感疫苗宣传中提及新冠病毒疫苗无负面影响:一项调查实验的证据

No negative effect of mentioning COVID-19 vaccine in influenza vaccine encouragements: Evidence from a survey experiment.

作者信息

Viskupič Filip, Wiltse David L

机构信息

Department of Political Science, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.

School of American and Global Studies, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, United States of America.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Sep 10;5(9):e0005180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005180. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

It is possible that the negative attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination developed by some people, such as self-identified Republicans, might spill over toward other vaccines. We conducted a survey experiment to investigate if mentioning COVID-19 vaccine in messages encouraging seasonal flu vaccination will negatively affect people's attitudes toward receiving a flu vaccine. The experiment was embedded in a survey fielded in South Dakota in April 2024. Participants were registered voters in the state. We used difference-of-means tests and logistic regression to analyze the data. Results showed no statistically significant differences between the participants in control and treatment groups regarding the likelihood of receiving a flu vaccine (OR: 1.012, CI: 0.594 - 1.724) or their belief in the safety of the flu vaccine (OR: 1.333, CI: 0.707- 2.511). We observed the same patterns when we only looked at Republicans. Attitudes toward flu vaccination were primarily driven by peoples' current flu vaccination status. We found that mentioning COVID-19 vaccines in flu vaccination messages did not negatively affect people's attitudes toward flu vaccine. Public health workers and officials might not need to shy away from mentioning COVID-19 vaccines when communicating other vaccines.

摘要

一些人,比如自称共和党人的那些人,对新冠疫苗接种持有的负面态度,有可能会蔓延到其他疫苗上。我们进行了一项调查实验,以探究在鼓励季节性流感疫苗接种的信息中提及新冠疫苗是否会对人们接受流感疫苗的态度产生负面影响。该实验嵌入在2024年4月在南达科他州进行的一项调查中。参与者是该州的登记选民。我们使用均值差异检验和逻辑回归来分析数据。结果显示,在接受流感疫苗的可能性(比值比:1.012,置信区间:0.594 - 1.724)或对流感疫苗安全性的信念方面,对照组和治疗组的参与者之间没有统计学上的显著差异(比值比:1.333,置信区间:0.707 - 2.511)。当我们只看共和党人时,观察到了相同的模式。对流感疫苗接种的态度主要由人们当前的流感疫苗接种状况驱动。我们发现,在流感疫苗接种信息中提及新冠疫苗不会对人们对流感疫苗的态度产生负面影响。公共卫生工作者和官员在宣传其他疫苗时,可能无需回避提及新冠疫苗。

相似文献

2
9
Influenza vaccines in immunosuppressed adults with cancer.癌症免疫抑制成人中的流感疫苗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD008983. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008983.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
A Call for Measuring Partisanship in US Public Health Research.呼吁在美国公共卫生研究中衡量党派偏见。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Aug;114(8):772-776. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307691. Epub 2024 May 16.
6
The Costs of Polarizing a Pandemic: Antecedents, Consequences, and Lessons.两极化大流行病的代价:前因、后果与教训。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Jul;19(4):624-639. doi: 10.1177/17456916231190395. Epub 2023 Oct 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验