• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

完全覆膜与部分覆膜自膨式金属支架治疗远端恶性胆道梗阻的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Fully covered versus partially covered self-expandable metal stents for palliation of distal malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Gastroenterology Department, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Mar;99(3):314-322.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.10.023. Epub 2023 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2023.10.023
PMID:37813199
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are standardly used for distal malignant biliary obstruction (dMBO). Although data suggest that covered versus uncovered SEMSs increase the time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO), no data are available for fully covered (FC) versus partially covered (PC) designs.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were screened up to January 2023 for studies concerning dMBO treated by an FC- or PC-SEMS and describing adverse events (AEs), recurrences, or TRBO for specific design subpopulations. Pooled proportions or means were calculated using a random-effects model. Several subanalyses were preplanned, including a subanalysis restricted to prospective studies and unresectable diseases. Heterogeneity and publication bias were explored. Standardized differences (d-values) were calculated between groups.

RESULTS

From 1290 records, 62 studies (3327 using FC-SEMSs and 2322 using PC-SEMSs) were included. FC- versus PC-SEMSs showed negligible differences in the rate of total AEs (12% vs 9.9%) and all specific AEs, including cholecystitis (2.5% vs 2.6%). In a subanalysis restricted to prospective studies and unresectable diseases, the rate of RBO was comparable between FC-SEMSs (27.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 23.7-31.2], I = 35.34%) and PC-SEMSs (25.3% [95% CI, 20.2-30.7], I = 85.09%), despite small differences (d-values between .186 and .216) in the rate of ingrowth (.5% vs 2.9%) favoring FC-SEMSs and migration (9.8% vs 4.3%) favoring PC-SEMSs. TRBO was shorter for FC-SEMSs (238 days [95% CI, 191-286], I = 63.1%) versus PC-SEMSs (369 days [95% CI, 290-449], I = 71.9%; d-value = .116).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite considerable heterogeneity and small standardized differences, PC-SEMSs consistently exhibited longer TRBO than FC-SEMSs across analyses, without any other differences in AE rates, potentially proposing PC-SEMSs as the standard comparator and TRBO as the primary outcome for future randomized studies on dMBO. (Clinical trial registration number: CRD42023393965.).

摘要

背景和目的

自膨式金属支架(SEMS)是治疗远端恶性胆道梗阻(dMBO)的标准方法。虽然有数据表明,覆膜与非覆膜 SEMS 可延长复发性胆道梗阻(TRBO)的时间,但对于完全覆膜(FC)与部分覆膜(PC)设计尚无数据。

方法

检索 PubMed、Scopus 和 Cochrane 数据库,截至 2023 年 1 月,查找关于 FC-或 PC-SEMS 治疗 dMBO 并描述特定设计亚组不良事件(AE)、复发或 TRBO 的研究。使用随机效应模型计算汇总比例或平均值。进行了几项亚分析,包括仅限于前瞻性研究和不可切除疾病的亚分析。探索了异质性和发表偏倚。计算了组间的标准化差异(d 值)。

结果

从 1290 条记录中,纳入了 62 项研究(3327 例使用 FC-SEMS,2322 例使用 PC-SEMS)。FC-SEMS 与 PC-SEMS 的总 AE 发生率(12%与 9.9%)和所有特定 AE 发生率(包括胆囊炎,2.5%与 2.6%)差异较小。在仅限于前瞻性研究和不可切除疾病的亚分析中,FC-SEMS 的 RBO 发生率(27.3%[95%置信区间{CI},23.7-31.2],I=35.34%)与 PC-SEMS(25.3%[95%CI,20.2-30.7],I=85.09%)相当,尽管在植入物生长(0.5%比 2.9%,有利于 FC-SEMS)和迁移(9.8%比 4.3%,有利于 PC-SEMS)方面存在较小差异(d 值在 0.186 至 0.216 之间)。FC-SEMS 的 TRBO 较短(238 天[95%CI,191-286],I=63.1%),而 PC-SEMS 较长(369 天[95%CI,290-449],I=71.9%;d 值为 0.116)。

结论

尽管存在较大的异质性和较小的标准化差异,但在所有分析中,PC-SEMS 的 TRBO 始终长于 FC-SEMS,AE 发生率无差异,这可能提示 PC-SEMS 是未来关于 dMBO 的随机研究的标准对照,TRBO 是主要结局。(临床试验注册号:CRD42023393965.)。

相似文献

1
Fully covered versus partially covered self-expandable metal stents for palliation of distal malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.完全覆膜与部分覆膜自膨式金属支架治疗远端恶性胆道梗阻的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Mar;99(3):314-322.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.10.023. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
2
Partially covered metal stents have longer patency than uncovered and fully covered metal stents in the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction: a retrospective study.一项回顾性研究表明:在远端恶性胆管梗阻的治疗中,部分覆膜金属支架的通畅时间比未覆膜及全覆膜金属支架更长。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct 11;17(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0662-1.
3
Partially Covered Metal Stents May Not Prolong Stent Patency Compared to Uncovered Stents in Unresectable Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction.在不可切除的恶性远端胆管梗阻中,与裸支架相比,部分覆膜金属支架可能无法延长支架通畅时间。
Gut Liver. 2017 May 15;11(3):440-446. doi: 10.5009/gnl16245.
4
Covered versus uncovered self-expandable metal stents for malignant biliary strictures: A meta-analysis and systematic review.覆膜与非覆膜自膨式金属支架治疗恶性胆管狭窄的Meta分析和系统评价
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep;35(5):323-330. doi: 10.1007/s12664-016-0682-8. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Multihole Partially Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.多孔部分覆盖自膨式金属支架治疗远端恶性胆管梗阻的疗效与安全性:一项单中心回顾性研究
DEN Open. 2025 Jun 22;6(1):e70168. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70168. eCollection 2026 Apr.
6
Covered versus uncovered metal stents for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis.用于恶性胃出口梗阻的覆膜与非覆膜金属支架:系统评价与荟萃分析
Dig Endosc. 2017 May;29(3):259-271. doi: 10.1111/den.12786. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
7
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub7.
8
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的电子烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub9.
9
Current Status of the Self-Expandable Metal Stent as a Bridge to Surgery Versus Emergency Surgery in Colorectal Cancer: Results from an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature.自膨式金属支架作为结直肠癌手术桥梁与急诊手术的现状:文献更新系统评价与荟萃分析结果
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Mar 15;57(3):268. doi: 10.3390/medicina57030268.
10
Covered self-expandable metal stents with an anti-migration system improve patency duration without increased complications compared with uncovered stents for distal biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic carcinoma: a randomized multicenter trial.带防迁移系统的覆膜自膨式金属支架与未覆膜支架相比,可改善因胰腺癌导致的远端胆道梗阻的通畅时间,而不增加并发症:一项随机多中心试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov;108(11):1713-22. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.305. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Case Report: Sequential PTCD and biliary seed stent combined with targeted-immunotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer with malignant obstructive jaundice: a multidisciplinary approach.病例报告:序贯经皮肝穿刺胆管引流术和胆道粒子支架联合靶向免疫治疗晚期胰腺癌伴恶性梗阻性黄疸:一种多学科方法
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 19;15:1649080. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1649080. eCollection 2025.
2
Advances in Endoscopic Management of Distal Biliary Stricture: Integrating Clinical Evidence into Patient-Specific Decision-Making.远端胆管狭窄的内镜治疗进展:将临床证据整合到个体化决策中
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 13;17(16):2644. doi: 10.3390/cancers17162644.
3
Prevention of stent migration of covered self-expandable metal stents in distal malignant biliary obstruction: a review of literature.
覆膜自膨式金属支架预防远端恶性胆管梗阻中支架移位的文献综述
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2025 Jun 29;13:goaf058. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goaf058. eCollection 2025.
4
Comparison of fully covered self-expandable metal stents with and without antimigration fins for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction.带防移位鳍片与不带防移位鳍片的全覆膜自膨式金属支架治疗远端恶性胆管梗阻的比较
Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2025.06.027.
5
The anti-migration effect of partially covered self-expandable metal stents for unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction: A multicenter comparative study.部分覆盖自膨式金属支架治疗不可切除性恶性远端胆管梗阻的抗迁移作用:一项多中心比较研究。
DEN Open. 2025 Mar 20;5(1):e70100. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70100. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
Multidisciplinary Therapeutic Approaches to Pancreatic Cancer According to the Resectability Status.根据可切除性状态的胰腺癌多学科治疗方法
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 11;14(4):1167. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041167.
7
12-mm Versus 10-mm Metallic Stents for Malignant Biliary Obstructions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.用于恶性胆管梗阻的12毫米与10毫米金属支架:系统评价与Meta分析
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jan;70(1):406-412. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08769-z. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
8
Biliary stents for active materials and surface modification: Recent advances and future perspectives.用于活性材料和表面改性的胆道支架:最新进展与未来展望。
Bioact Mater. 2024 Sep 13;42:587-612. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.08.031. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Endoscopic management of malignant biliary obstructions.恶性胆管梗阻的内镜治疗
Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 May-Jun;37(3):291-302. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0883. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
10
Same-session endoscopic diagnosis and symptom palliation in pancreato-biliary malignancies: Clinical impact of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE).胰胆恶性肿瘤的同期内镜诊断与症状缓解:快速现场评估(ROSE)的临床影响
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Feb 28;12(2):E297-E306. doi: 10.1055/a-2251-3551. eCollection 2024 Feb.