Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, P.O Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Uganda Catholic Medical Bureau, Uganda Catholic Secretariat, Nsambya Hill, 672 Hanlon Road, P. O. Box 2886, Kampala, Uganda.
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Oct 5;17(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0843-8.
A case study was prepared examining government resource contributions (GRCs) to private-not-for-profit (PNFP) providers in Uganda. It focuses on Primary Health Care (PHC) grants to the largest non-profit provider network, the Uganda Catholic Medical Bureau (UCMB), from 1997 to 2015. The framework of complex adaptive systems was used to explain changes in resource contributions and the relationship between the Government and UCMB.
Documents and key informant interviews with the important actors provided the main sources of qualitative data. Trends for GRCs and service outputs for the study period were constructed from existing databases used to monitor service inputs and outputs. The case study's findings were validated during two meetings with a broad set of stakeholders.
Three major phases were identified in the evolution of GRCs and the relationship between the Government and UCMB: 1) Initiation, 2) Rapid increase in GRCs, and 3) Declining GRCs. The main factors affecting the relationship's evolution were: 1) Financial deficits at PNFP facilities, 2) advocacy by PNFP network leaders, 3) changes in the government financial resource envelope, 4) variations in the "good will" of government actors, and 5) changes in donor funding modalities. Responses to the above dynamics included changes in user fees, operational costs of PNFPs, and government expectations of UCMB. Quantitative findings showed a progressive increase in service outputs despite the declining value of GRCs during the study period.
GRCs in Uganda have evolved influenced by various factors and the complex interactions between government and PNFPs. The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) agenda should pay attention to these factors and their interactions when shaping how governments work with PNFPs to advance UHC. GRCs could be leveraged to mitigate the financial burden on communities served by PNFPs. Governments seeking to advance UHC goals should explore policies to expand GRCs and other modalities to subsidize the operational costs of PNFPs.
本案例研究旨在探讨乌干达政府资源投入(GRC)对非营利性私营(PNFP)医疗机构的影响。研究重点是 1997 年至 2015 年期间,向最大的非营利性医疗机构网络——乌干达天主教医疗局(UCMB)提供的基层医疗保健(PHC)赠款。本研究采用复杂适应系统框架来解释资源投入的变化以及政府与 UCMB 之间的关系。
通过文件和对重要利益相关者的访谈,获取了案例研究的主要定性数据来源。利用现有的服务投入和产出监测数据库,构建了研究期间 GRC 和服务产出的趋势。在与广泛的利益相关者进行的两次会议上,对案例研究的结果进行了验证。
确定了 GRC 和政府与 UCMB 之间关系演变的三个主要阶段:1)启动阶段,2)GRC 快速增长阶段,3)GRC 减少阶段。影响关系演变的主要因素包括:1)PNFP 机构的财务赤字,2)PNFP 网络领导者的倡导,3)政府财政资源状况的变化,4)政府行为者“善意”的变化,5)捐赠资金模式的变化。对上述动态的反应包括用户费用、PNFP 运营成本和政府对 UCMB 的期望的变化。定量研究结果表明,尽管研究期间 GRC 的价值不断下降,但服务产出仍呈渐进式增长。
乌干达的 GRC 受到各种因素的影响,并受到政府与 PNFPs 之间复杂互动的影响。全民健康覆盖(UHC)议程在制定政府与 PNFPs 合作以推进 UHC 的方式时,应关注这些因素及其相互作用。可以利用 GRC 来减轻 PNFPs 服务社区的财务负担。政府在寻求推进 UHC 目标时,应探索扩大 GRC 和其他补贴 PNFPs 运营成本的政策。