Griffen Corbin, Renshaw Derek, Duncan Michael, Weickert Martin O, Hattersley John
Centre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Human Metabolism Research Unit, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Physiol Rep. 2022 Jun;10(11):e15268. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15268.
To investigate changes in 24-h energy expenditure (EE), substrate oxidation, and body composition following resistance exercise (RE) and a high protein diet via whey protein supplementation (alone and combined) in healthy older men.
In a pooled groups analysis, 33 healthy older men [(mean ± SE) age: 67 ± 1 years; BMI: 25.4 ± 0.4 kg/m] were randomized to either RE (2×/week; n = 17) or non-exercise (n = 16) and either a high protein diet via whey protein supplementation (PRO, 2 × 25 g whey protein isolate/d; n = 17) or control (CON, 2 × 23.75 g maltodextrin/d; n = 16). An exploratory sub-analysis was also conducted between RE+CON (n = 8) and RE+PRO (n = 9). At baseline and 12 weeks, participants resided in respiration chambers for measurement of 24-h EE and substrate oxidation and wore an accelerometer for 7 days for estimation of free-living EE.
Resistance exercise resulted in greater increases in fat-free mass (1.0 ± 0.3 kg), resting metabolic rate [(RMR) 36 ± 14 kcal/d], sedentary EE (60 ± 33 kcal/d), and sleeping metabolic rate [(SMR) 45 ± 7 kcal/d] compared to non-exercise (p < 0.05); however, RE decreased activity energy expenditure in free-living (-90 ± 25 kcal/d; p = 0.049) and non-exercise activity inside the respiration chamber (-1.9 ± 1.1%; p = 0.049). PRO decreased fat mass [(FM) -0.5 ± 0.3 kg], increased overnight protein oxidation (30 ± 6 g/d), and decreased 24-h protein balance (-20 ± 4 g/d) greater than CON (p < 0.05). RE+PRO decreased FM (-1.0 ± 0.5 kg) greater than RE+CON (p = 0.04).
Resistance exercise significantly increased RMR, SMR, and sedentary EE in healthy older men, but not total EE. PRO alone and combined with RE decreased FM and aided body weight maintenance. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03299972.
研究抗阻运动(RE)和通过补充乳清蛋白(单独或联合)摄入高蛋白饮食后,健康老年男性24小时能量消耗(EE)、底物氧化和身体成分的变化。
在一项合并组分析中,33名健康老年男性[(均值±标准误)年龄:67±1岁;体重指数:25.4±0.4kg/m²]被随机分为RE组(每周2次;n = 17)或非运动组(n = 16),以及通过补充乳清蛋白摄入高蛋白饮食组(PRO组,每日2次,每次25g乳清蛋白分离物;n = 17)或对照组(CON组,每日2次,每次23.75g麦芽糊精;n = 16)。还对RE+CON组(n = 8)和RE+PRO组(n = 9)进行了探索性亚分析。在基线和12周时,参与者居住在呼吸室内测量24小时EE和底物氧化,并佩戴加速度计7天以估计自由生活EE。
与非运动组相比,抗阻运动使去脂体重增加更多(1.0±0.3kg),静息代谢率[(RMR)36±14kcal/d]、久坐时EE(60±33kcal/d)和睡眠代谢率[(SMR)45±7kcal/d]更高(p<0.05);然而,抗阻运动使自由生活时的活动能量消耗降低(-90±25kcal/d;p = 0.049),呼吸室内非运动活动的能量消耗降低(-1.9±1.1%;p = 0.049)。与CON组相比,PRO组的脂肪量减少更多[(FM)-0.5±0.3kg],夜间蛋白质氧化增加(30±6g/d),24小时蛋白质平衡降低更多(-20±4g/d)(p<0.05)。RE+PRO组的FM降低幅度(-1.0±0.5kg)大于RE+CON组(p = 0.04)。
抗阻运动显著增加了健康老年男性的RMR、SMR和久坐时EE,但未增加总EE。单独补充PRO以及PRO与RE联合补充均可降低FM并有助于维持体重。本研究已在clinicaltrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT03299972。