Cornwall Intellectual Disability Equitable Research (CIDER), Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Truro, UK.
School of Medicine, Cornwall Intellectual Disability Equitable Research (CIDER), University of Plymouth Peninsula, Truro, UK.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2024 Feb;68(2):140-149. doi: 10.1111/jir.13097. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
The study aims to understand system barriers to research participation for people with intellectual disabilities.
A mixed-methods approach examined the inclusivity of people with intellectual disabilities (IDs) in a random sample of National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) studies conducted in 2019-2020. An online questionnaire (stage 1) was sent to the selected studies lead investigators. An expert by experience panel of 25 people with intellectual disabilities (IDs, stage 2), discussed the stage 1 feedback. Descriptive statistics for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative data was conducted.
Of 180 studies reviewed, 131 studies (78%) excluded people with IDs. Of these, 45 (34.3%) study researchers provided feedback. Seven (20%) of the 34 studies which included people with IDs gave feedback. Of all respondents over half felt their study had some relevance to people with IDs. A minority (7.6%) stated their study had no relevance. For a quarter of respondents (23.5%), resource issues were a challenge. Qualitative analysis of both stages produced four overarching themes of Research design and delivery, Informed consent, Resource allocation, and Knowledge and skills.
Health research continues to exclude people with IDs. Researchers and experts by experience identified non-accessible research design, lack of confidence with capacity and consent processes, limited resources such as time and a need for training as barriers. Ethics committees appear reluctant to include people with cognitive deficits to 'protect' them. People with IDs want to be included in research, not only as participants but also through coproduction.
本研究旨在了解智力障碍者参与研究的系统障碍。
采用混合方法,考察了 2019-2020 年国家卫生与保健研究中心(NIHR)进行的随机样本研究中智力障碍者(ID)的包容性。向选定的研究负责人发送了一份在线问卷(第 1 阶段)。一个由 25 名智力障碍者(ID,第 2 阶段)组成的专家经验小组讨论了第 1 阶段的反馈。对定量数据进行描述性统计分析,对定性数据进行主题分析。
在审查的 180 项研究中,有 131 项(78%)排除了 ID 患者。在这些研究中,有 45 项(34.3%)研究人员提供了反馈。7 项(20%)纳入 ID 患者的研究提供了反馈。所有受访者中,超过一半的人认为他们的研究与 ID 患者有一定的相关性。少数人(7.6%)表示他们的研究与 ID 患者无关。对于四分之一的受访者(23.5%)来说,资源问题是一个挑战。两个阶段的定性分析产生了四个总体主题:研究设计和实施、知情同意、资源分配以及知识和技能。
健康研究继续排除 ID 患者。研究人员和专家经验丰富者确定了无障碍研究设计、缺乏能力和同意程序方面的信心、时间等有限资源以及培训需求等障碍。伦理委员会似乎不愿意让认知障碍者参与研究,以“保护”他们。ID 患者希望参与研究,不仅作为参与者,还希望通过共同制定计划参与研究。