are with the Postgraduate Program in Nutrition and Health, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
are with the Department of Nutrition, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Nutr Rev. 2023 Oct 10;81(11):1414-1440. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad022.
Reduced muscle mass is linked to poor outcomes in both inpatients and outpatients, highlighting the importance of muscle mass assessment in clinical practice. However, laboratory methods to assess muscle mass are not yet feasible for routine use in clinical practice because of limited availability and high costs.
This work aims to review the literature on muscle mass prediction by anthropometric equations in adults or older people.
The following databases were searched for observational studies published until June 2022: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science.
Of 6437 articles initially identified, 63 met the inclusion criteria for this review. Four independent reviewers, working in pairs, selected and extracted data from those articles.
Two studies reported new equations for prediction of skeletal muscle mass: 10 equations for free-fat mass and lean soft tissue, 22 for appendicular lean mass, 7 for upper-body muscle mass, and 7 for lower-body muscle mass. Twenty-one studies validated previously proposed equations. This systematic review shows there are numerous equations in the literature for muscle mass prediction, and most are validated for healthy adults. However, many equations were not always accurate and validated in all groups, especially people with obesity, undernourished people, and older people. Moreover, in some studies, it was unclear if fat-free mass or lean soft tissue had been assessed because of an imprecise description of muscle mass terminology.
This systematic review identified several feasible, practical, and low-cost equations for muscle mass prediction, some of which have excellent accuracy in healthy adults, older people, women, and athletes. Malnourished individuals and people with obesity were understudied in the literature, as were older people, for whom there are only equations for appendicular lean mass.
PROSPERO registration number CRD42021257200.
肌肉减少与住院患者和门诊患者的不良结局相关,这凸显了在临床实践中评估肌肉量的重要性。然而,由于可用性有限和成本高,用于评估肌肉量的实验室方法尚未在临床实践中可行。
本研究旨在综述成人或老年人通过人体测量方程预测肌肉量的文献。
检索了截至 2022 年 6 月发表的观察性研究的以下数据库:MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、SPORTDiscus 和 Web of Science。
最初确定的 6437 篇文章中,有 63 篇符合本综述的纳入标准。四名独立的审查员两两合作,从这些文章中选择和提取数据。
有 2 项研究报告了预测骨骼肌量的新方程:10 项用于预测去脂体重和瘦体组织,22 项用于预测四肢瘦体重,7 项用于预测上肢肌肉量,7 项用于预测下肢肌肉量。21 项研究验证了先前提出的方程。本系统综述表明,文献中有许多预测肌肉量的方程,且大多数在健康成年人中得到验证。然而,许多方程并不总是准确的,也没有在所有人群中得到验证,尤其是肥胖人群、营养不良人群和老年人。此外,在一些研究中,由于对肌肉量术语的描述不准确,不清楚是否评估了去脂体重或瘦体组织。
本系统综述确定了几种可行、实用且成本低的肌肉量预测方程,其中一些在健康成年人、老年人、女性和运动员中具有很高的准确性。营养不良人群和肥胖人群在文献中研究较少,而老年人只有四肢瘦体重的方程。
PROSPERO 注册号 CRD42021257200。